General Discussion

cali

(114,904 posts)

14. So youre embarrassed for yourself: You've been engaging in that stuff too.

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Mon Apr 13, 2015, 07:47 PM

Apr 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

122 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

just over 24 hours since the big announcement and we have discussed Hillary's [View all] boston bean Apr 2015 OP

Well I for one would like to discuss her shoes. William769 Apr 2015 #1

You better be ducking down the chimney! LOL boston bean Apr 2015 #6

Me too! Shoes and feet. Feet! Have you seen her feet? NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #34

Then again, maybe we shouldn't "go there." Jamastiene Apr 2015 #107

nah, just her age, we don't need 70 year old presidents... snooper2 Apr 2015 #81

Do you understand that Warren is Hillary's age? MoonRiver Apr 2015 #87

And I care about that why? WARREN ISN'T RUNNING snooper2 Apr 2015 #91

There's a lot you can criticize Hillary for, but, IMHO, age shouldn't be one of them. InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #94

why snooper2 Apr 2015 #97

I don't believe in being an agist. With advanced age, comes experience, which in Elizabeth Warren's case, it's the right experience. InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #101

well, first, Warren isn't running, second, with age comes something called "being out of touch" snooper2 Apr 2015 #104

I have no desire to get into a pissin contest with you snoop, and believe me, I'm no Hillary fan, but... InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #109

And I have seen old Mark Rich come out of the woodwork leftofcool Apr 2015 #2

oh yeah... I saw that one too. smh.. boston bean Apr 2015 #3

Apparently, you weren't paying attention either ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #54

I wanna know how she will clean her shoes after she kicks the shit out of the republicans NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #4

Ok...that was funny. cyberswede Apr 2015 #49

+1 ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #82

Have you visited her website? She's not leaving us with any information to discuss on ANY issue. Luminous Animal Apr 2015 #5

Sure, so we must discuss her attractiveness and hair boston bean Apr 2015 #8

Watching tv today I heard Paul Begalla say.... Little Star Apr 2015 #11

Yes. She needs some time to focus-group her deeply held convictions. n/t RufusTFirefly Apr 2015 #17

but she's ONLY got 19 months to explain her candidacy!!! Why didn't she tell us CAG Apr 2015 #37

That would have been far too late ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #57

Why hasn't she told us anything? morningfog Apr 2015 #64

Its a conspiracy.... I bet she tells us nothing by midnight tomorrow night.... CAG Apr 2015 #65

No conspiracy. It's just insulting. morningfog Apr 2015 #66

Its.....April.....13.....2015...... everything will be OK..... have you checked how many CAG Apr 2015 #67

Don't play the higher standard card. No other dem has announced. morningfog Apr 2015 #68

Oooh, the conspiracy deepens - they're ALL holding back CAG Apr 2015 #69

I can certainly understand why a person needs eighteen months to decipher, unravel and translat LanternWaste Apr 2015 #102

You mean re-branding. Makes you wonder...what was wrong with the old branding? InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #99

For one thing, that brand lost! morningfog Apr 2015 #110

Okay, but that loss was to the far superior candidate, Obama. Unless Elizabeth jumps into the race... InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #113

You hit the nail on the head. morningfog Apr 2015 #121

we can certainly understand why one feels churlishly forced to pontificate on logos and hair instead LanternWaste Apr 2015 #100

I was worried the internet would allow me to enjoy Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #7

The internet is where you find photoshops of her naked. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #39

I meant the more progressive blogosphere, like here. Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #42

Let her create an account like Alan Grayson did.... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #52

Que? Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #55

I saw several women from here saying they wanted to have his baby. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #71

Wtf? Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #72

No, for that I would post a pic of Alan Grayson naked. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #73

Thanks for your support of feminism. Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #74

Considering I worked on the ERA campaign back in the day. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #76

It never does. Jamastiene Apr 2015 #108

Slight Contradiction Rilgin Apr 2015 #122

It was said in the context of a compliment madokie Apr 2015 #9

So says every guy who thinks a womans worth is what men boston bean Apr 2015 #10

Go away, madokie Apr 2015 #12

I won't go away.. but truly, I would like to understand and you were boston bean Apr 2015 #15

Not shocked by that bettyellen Apr 2015 #31

Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT. Autumn Apr 2015 #90

It sure was a childish alert. BeanMusical Apr 2015 #116

Ask Palin. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #40

It's still insulting to ALL professional women. We do not care who anyone wants to fuck, so y'all bettyellen Apr 2015 #13

Did I even mention the f word madokie Apr 2015 #19

No one gives a fuck for your evaluations in who is attractive enough, okay? It's sexist and bettyellen Apr 2015 #20

What ever madokie Apr 2015 #23

Get over sharing whatever "pants feelings" you have regarding professional bettyellen Apr 2015 #26

Seriously girl I did not insinuate madokie Apr 2015 #27

Lol, there is nothing wrong with sex- but plenty wrong with judging professional women by looks. bettyellen Apr 2015 #30

Bettyellen the post I was replying to was about how she looks madokie Apr 2015 #32

Exactly- and it has no place in a progressive discussion of candidates- dating you is not criteria bettyellen Apr 2015 #35

Girl? AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #48

...or "shrill" nt cyberswede Apr 2015 #50

I think it was because the poster called him dude previously yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #51

It's not a compliment. TDale313 Apr 2015 #18

Yep. It's very demeaning to judge professional women in their looks. Screw this BS. bettyellen Apr 2015 #22

Ew. ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #83

So youre embarrassed for yourself: You've been engaging in that stuff too. cali Apr 2015 #14

I'm embarassed for the people who supported it. But you know that already.. boston bean Apr 2015 #16

Will you be my girlfriend? NET Apr 2015 #38

Actually BB has been reminding others what bullshit this is all day- bettyellen Apr 2015 #24

FFS, do you want some links that discuss other stuff. Or can you find them on your own? nth Logical Apr 2015 #21

This right here ^^^ ... OP does nothing to change the subject and then complains. nt ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2015 #56

Yes, all criticism about Clinton is utterly vapid and sexist. jeff47 Apr 2015 #25

It is amazing how the sexist Hillary haters want Warren. LOL! Nt Logical Apr 2015 #59

I second that Lol. BeanMusical Apr 2015 #117

sexism is used as a tool. repugs do not use it with their women either. they use it as a tool to seabeyond Apr 2015 #119

Well that depends now doesn't it? ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #85

What about... OilemFirchen Apr 2015 #28

I'm appalled at the jabs about JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #29

I co-sign this post. Number23 Apr 2015 #36

Me too ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #114

i figured he had the best chance not being totally tied to corporate and go after bushco seabeyond Apr 2015 #115

Can I plus 1 your post... one_voice Apr 2015 #41

The logo thing is just ignorant. It's a non-issue rpannier Apr 2015 #44

It has been appalling. If this was done to Warren the same people would be screaming hrmjustin Apr 2015 #33

LOL snooper2 Apr 2015 #84

Nice selfie. n/t JTFrog Apr 2015 #88

LOL boston bean Apr 2015 #96

Criticism is good and helthy but the mean stuff is so free republic. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #89

If that's all you've seen, you really haven't been paying attention rpannier Apr 2015 #43

It's pathetic and sexist MaggieD Apr 2015 #45

I'm at a loss for material things to discuss. AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #46

Haters of all things Clinton always overplay their hand arely staircase Apr 2015 #47

Please don't do that ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2015 #103

we haven't even gotten to her shrill voice yet! KittyWampus Apr 2015 #53

... ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2015 #58

screechy mercuryblues Apr 2015 #80

ya. i was gonna say, didnt we hear this one yet? they are pulling on their sexism out of their ass seabeyond Apr 2015 #92

and they were actually having a serious conversation about if so or not, if i remember correctly. seabeyond Apr 2015 #93

Having watched it happen over the last two years with Wendy Davis here in Texas... ScreamingMeemie Apr 2015 #60

yes. excellent. we just walked this with wendy davis. thank you for the point. yes. !!! nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #95

It's because she's offered nothing substantive LittleBlue Apr 2015 #61

People discussed that with Obama as well IIRC The Straight Story Apr 2015 #62

All stupid things to discuss. I wish she would start talking morningfog Apr 2015 #63

Good thing we got that out of the way early right? Rex Apr 2015 #70

It's already Snow White and the Seven, or Eight, or Nine, or more Dwarfs. calimary Apr 2015 #75

You're right. We should focus on things that actually matter. name not needed Apr 2015 #77

Why dont you show everyone how its done ? CentralMass Apr 2015 #78

I have to disagree about the logo. RandySF Apr 2015 #79

yes, it works great snooper2 Apr 2015 #86

FYI Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #111

thanks, that was greatness- snooper2 Apr 2015 #112

you know what? i think it was clever. i did not pay attention to the broohaha first couple days. seabeyond Apr 2015 #98

I haven't been around. Jamastiene Apr 2015 #105

Combating threads about clothes with threads about posters who write threads about clothes. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2015 #106

Great. You brought up her shoes. jmowreader Apr 2015 #118

Can we please get serious and talk about her wardrobe? n/t Orsino Apr 2015 #120