General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here's the thing - don't expect me to be enthused about someone who cozys up to a mass murderer. [View all]Marr
(20,317 posts)I'm a graphic designer myself, and I've honestly seen more developed logos on a first round exploration with 25 options on it. It looks like something that would've been tossed out of the first round of a meeting in 1995. It's angular, unfriendly, and static. Even the colors are weirdly stale. It's just flat and boring and predictable and... weak.
And that's not even mentioning the whole deal with the red arrow pointing to the right, and how some will interpret that. Even a huge Hillary Clinton fan who doesn't agree with that reading should be able to recognize that many will, so it wasn't a wise choice. I mean there's no reason to piss anyone off with a logo.
It really does make me wonder how much of a bubble Hillary and her campaign crew lives in. They clearly aren't even slightly concerned about being perceived as too far to the right, if they could look at a logo with a red, right-facing arrow and give it a thumbs up.