General Discussion

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)

111. FYI

Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:19 PM

Apr 2015

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:25 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

yes, it works great
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6504980

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

So, DU is going to be the place where we mock Democratic Presidential candidates? This hardly seems appropriate for a democratic website. Constructive criticism is one thing, but joining in with the republicans with this childish is over the top.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:37 AM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I agree with alerter that this is republican ammunition, but not worthy of a hide.
Let the poster defend it.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This post could be considered indirect criticism of Hillary's superficial rollout, which, apparently, in the poster's mind, landed with a thud. It's certainly not over the top, especially when it's only the Democratic primary season. It would be different if this was posted during the general election, when we all have to band togerher to defeat the Rethug candidate.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I'm gonna' tell my mommy! My fweelings are hurt! WWAAAAAAAA!!
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Dear alerter: this is not HRC Underground. We are not sworn to loyalty to your candidate.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Mild when compared to other garbage I've seen directed toward Hillary on this Democratic site. I didn't realize how many mean and nasty adolescents post here.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: To the alerter. DU has always been in flames during primaries. Hillary is still in a primary although up until now uncontested so she's fair game and the poster has the right to express this opinion.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

122 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

just over 24 hours since the big announcement and we have discussed Hillary's [View all] boston bean Apr 2015 OP

Well I for one would like to discuss her shoes. William769 Apr 2015 #1

You better be ducking down the chimney! LOL boston bean Apr 2015 #6

Me too! Shoes and feet. Feet! Have you seen her feet? NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #34

Then again, maybe we shouldn't "go there." Jamastiene Apr 2015 #107

nah, just her age, we don't need 70 year old presidents... snooper2 Apr 2015 #81

Do you understand that Warren is Hillary's age? MoonRiver Apr 2015 #87

And I care about that why? WARREN ISN'T RUNNING snooper2 Apr 2015 #91

There's a lot you can criticize Hillary for, but, IMHO, age shouldn't be one of them. InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #94

why snooper2 Apr 2015 #97

I don't believe in being an agist. With advanced age, comes experience, which in Elizabeth Warren's case, it's the right experience. InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #101

well, first, Warren isn't running, second, with age comes something called "being out of touch" snooper2 Apr 2015 #104

I have no desire to get into a pissin contest with you snoop, and believe me, I'm no Hillary fan, but... InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #109

And I have seen old Mark Rich come out of the woodwork leftofcool Apr 2015 #2

oh yeah... I saw that one too. smh.. boston bean Apr 2015 #3

Apparently, you weren't paying attention either ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #54

I wanna know how she will clean her shoes after she kicks the shit out of the republicans NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #4

Ok...that was funny. cyberswede Apr 2015 #49

+1 ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #82

Have you visited her website? She's not leaving us with any information to discuss on ANY issue. Luminous Animal Apr 2015 #5

Sure, so we must discuss her attractiveness and hair boston bean Apr 2015 #8

Watching tv today I heard Paul Begalla say.... Little Star Apr 2015 #11

Yes. She needs some time to focus-group her deeply held convictions. n/t RufusTFirefly Apr 2015 #17

but she's ONLY got 19 months to explain her candidacy!!! Why didn't she tell us CAG Apr 2015 #37

That would have been far too late ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #57

Why hasn't she told us anything? morningfog Apr 2015 #64

Its a conspiracy.... I bet she tells us nothing by midnight tomorrow night.... CAG Apr 2015 #65

No conspiracy. It's just insulting. morningfog Apr 2015 #66

Its.....April.....13.....2015...... everything will be OK..... have you checked how many CAG Apr 2015 #67

Don't play the higher standard card. No other dem has announced. morningfog Apr 2015 #68

Oooh, the conspiracy deepens - they're ALL holding back CAG Apr 2015 #69

I can certainly understand why a person needs eighteen months to decipher, unravel and translat LanternWaste Apr 2015 #102

You mean re-branding. Makes you wonder...what was wrong with the old branding? InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #99

For one thing, that brand lost! morningfog Apr 2015 #110

Okay, but that loss was to the far superior candidate, Obama. Unless Elizabeth jumps into the race... InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #113

You hit the nail on the head. morningfog Apr 2015 #121

we can certainly understand why one feels churlishly forced to pontificate on logos and hair instead LanternWaste Apr 2015 #100

I was worried the internet would allow me to enjoy Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #7

The internet is where you find photoshops of her naked. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #39

I meant the more progressive blogosphere, like here. Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #42

Let her create an account like Alan Grayson did.... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #52

Que? Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #55

I saw several women from here saying they wanted to have his baby. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #71

Wtf? Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #72

No, for that I would post a pic of Alan Grayson naked. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #73

Thanks for your support of feminism. Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #74

Considering I worked on the ERA campaign back in the day. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #76

It never does. Jamastiene Apr 2015 #108

Slight Contradiction Rilgin Apr 2015 #122

It was said in the context of a compliment madokie Apr 2015 #9

So says every guy who thinks a womans worth is what men boston bean Apr 2015 #10

Go away, madokie Apr 2015 #12

I won't go away.. but truly, I would like to understand and you were boston bean Apr 2015 #15

Not shocked by that bettyellen Apr 2015 #31

Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT. Autumn Apr 2015 #90

It sure was a childish alert. BeanMusical Apr 2015 #116

Ask Palin. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #40

It's still insulting to ALL professional women. We do not care who anyone wants to fuck, so y'all bettyellen Apr 2015 #13

Did I even mention the f word madokie Apr 2015 #19

No one gives a fuck for your evaluations in who is attractive enough, okay? It's sexist and bettyellen Apr 2015 #20

What ever madokie Apr 2015 #23

Get over sharing whatever "pants feelings" you have regarding professional bettyellen Apr 2015 #26

Seriously girl I did not insinuate madokie Apr 2015 #27

Lol, there is nothing wrong with sex- but plenty wrong with judging professional women by looks. bettyellen Apr 2015 #30

Bettyellen the post I was replying to was about how she looks madokie Apr 2015 #32

Exactly- and it has no place in a progressive discussion of candidates- dating you is not criteria bettyellen Apr 2015 #35

Girl? AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #48

...or "shrill" nt cyberswede Apr 2015 #50

I think it was because the poster called him dude previously yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #51

It's not a compliment. TDale313 Apr 2015 #18

Yep. It's very demeaning to judge professional women in their looks. Screw this BS. bettyellen Apr 2015 #22

Ew. ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #83

So youre embarrassed for yourself: You've been engaging in that stuff too. cali Apr 2015 #14

I'm embarassed for the people who supported it. But you know that already.. boston bean Apr 2015 #16

Will you be my girlfriend? NET Apr 2015 #38

Actually BB has been reminding others what bullshit this is all day- bettyellen Apr 2015 #24

FFS, do you want some links that discuss other stuff. Or can you find them on your own? nth Logical Apr 2015 #21

This right here ^^^ ... OP does nothing to change the subject and then complains. nt ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2015 #56

Yes, all criticism about Clinton is utterly vapid and sexist. jeff47 Apr 2015 #25

It is amazing how the sexist Hillary haters want Warren. LOL! Nt Logical Apr 2015 #59

I second that Lol. BeanMusical Apr 2015 #117

sexism is used as a tool. repugs do not use it with their women either. they use it as a tool to seabeyond Apr 2015 #119

Well that depends now doesn't it? ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #85

What about... OilemFirchen Apr 2015 #28

I'm appalled at the jabs about JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #29

I co-sign this post. Number23 Apr 2015 #36

Me too ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #114

i figured he had the best chance not being totally tied to corporate and go after bushco seabeyond Apr 2015 #115

Can I plus 1 your post... one_voice Apr 2015 #41

The logo thing is just ignorant. It's a non-issue rpannier Apr 2015 #44

It has been appalling. If this was done to Warren the same people would be screaming hrmjustin Apr 2015 #33

LOL snooper2 Apr 2015 #84

Nice selfie. n/t JTFrog Apr 2015 #88

LOL boston bean Apr 2015 #96

Criticism is good and helthy but the mean stuff is so free republic. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #89

If that's all you've seen, you really haven't been paying attention rpannier Apr 2015 #43

It's pathetic and sexist MaggieD Apr 2015 #45

I'm at a loss for material things to discuss. AtheistCrusader Apr 2015 #46

Haters of all things Clinton always overplay their hand arely staircase Apr 2015 #47

Please don't do that ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2015 #103

we haven't even gotten to her shrill voice yet! KittyWampus Apr 2015 #53

... ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2015 #58

screechy mercuryblues Apr 2015 #80

ya. i was gonna say, didnt we hear this one yet? they are pulling on their sexism out of their ass seabeyond Apr 2015 #92

and they were actually having a serious conversation about if so or not, if i remember correctly. seabeyond Apr 2015 #93

Having watched it happen over the last two years with Wendy Davis here in Texas... ScreamingMeemie Apr 2015 #60

yes. excellent. we just walked this with wendy davis. thank you for the point. yes. !!! nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #95

It's because she's offered nothing substantive LittleBlue Apr 2015 #61

People discussed that with Obama as well IIRC The Straight Story Apr 2015 #62

All stupid things to discuss. I wish she would start talking morningfog Apr 2015 #63

Good thing we got that out of the way early right? Rex Apr 2015 #70

It's already Snow White and the Seven, or Eight, or Nine, or more Dwarfs. calimary Apr 2015 #75

You're right. We should focus on things that actually matter. name not needed Apr 2015 #77

Why dont you show everyone how its done ? CentralMass Apr 2015 #78

I have to disagree about the logo. RandySF Apr 2015 #79

yes, it works great snooper2 Apr 2015 #86

FYI Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #111

thanks, that was greatness- snooper2 Apr 2015 #112

you know what? i think it was clever. i did not pay attention to the broohaha first couple days. seabeyond Apr 2015 #98

I haven't been around. Jamastiene Apr 2015 #105

Combating threads about clothes with threads about posters who write threads about clothes. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2015 #106

Great. You brought up her shoes. jmowreader Apr 2015 #118

Can we please get serious and talk about her wardrobe? n/t Orsino Apr 2015 #120