Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)

24. If I wanted someone to make those hard decisions, I would vote for a Bush, Cruz, Paul, or other

Reply to jamzrockz (Reply #23)

Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:47 PM

Apr 2015

Republican dipshit. Hell, if I wanted that, I would seek out one of the "Boys From Brazil" and put them in charge.

There are things that are unacceptable, and killing me, my family, my neighbors, dogs, cats, fish, and everything else in my neighborhood "fur Amerika" is unacceptable.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Strong' evidence of Syria regime chemical attacks: HRW [View all] oberliner Apr 2015 OP

More stuff to get us into war. You know, tear gas is "chemical weapon." nt kelliekat44 Apr 2015 #1

Chlorine gas used as a weapon of war is not "tear gas" nor was"tear gas" mentioned or used. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #4

When these claims are investigated they betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #11

So now HRW is liars???! mylye2222 Apr 2015 #13

Don't know about her personally but she does tend to believe neocon lies betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #15

HRW is "Human Rights Watch." HRC is "Hillary Rodham Clinton." They are not synonymous. Links below: Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #17

Human Rights Watch has a pretty bad record too. betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #18

Opposition to Freeman does not a "track record" make. LanternWaste Apr 2015 #20

Human Rights Watch is already created a questionable track record in Syria itself. betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #22

Pulling out a Jeffry Goldberg, eh. "Some of the most strenuous opposition to Freeman's appointment Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #21

Anything from them on the Depleted Uranium used malaise Apr 2015 #2

Yes, they issued a report about that oberliner Apr 2015 #5

Assad says his government does not drop 'barrel bombs'. I'm sure he will deny that there are pampango Apr 2015 #3

I would like to know who amongst us jamzrockz Apr 2015 #6

Against civilians though? oberliner Apr 2015 #7

Do you mean jamzrockz Apr 2015 #9

No I mean just deliberately targeting civilians oberliner Apr 2015 #12

Chemical weapons in a populated area are an abhorrent war crime. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #8

I think the existence of ISIS jamzrockz Apr 2015 #10

I would. Chemical weapons dropped on Al Nusra or ISIS in Poway, California USA Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #19

But what if the marines jamzrockz Apr 2015 #23

If I wanted someone to make those hard decisions, I would vote for a Bush, Cruz, Paul, or other Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #24

Look jamzrockz Apr 2015 #25

ISIS is no joke. Using Chemical weapons on our own citzens in our own country would be a crime. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #26

Who do you hate more Assad or ISIS? Jesus Malverde Apr 2015 #14

Me personally or Human Rights Watch? oberliner Apr 2015 #16