General Discussion

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)

4. The POINT IS....

Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:52 AM

Apr 2015

There is no need to "look up the definition of IF" WHEN other Democratic Candidates have not declared their candidacy yet in April 2015. Last time we checked, the Primary Nominee is not decided upon the April before the election year itself. Correct?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton’s Progressive Problem [View all] LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 OP

Come the general election, if Hillary Clinton is the nominee they will decide whether to protect Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #1

Amazing.... LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #2

Look up the definion of the word, "if." I wrote "If Hillary Clinton..." Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #3

The POINT IS.... LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #4

If (conjunction) used to talk about the result or effect of something that may happen or be true; or Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #5

If, If was a Fifth... LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #9

"If Hillary Clinton wins the nomination" It is necessary to agree on the meaing of a post before we Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #39

It's not a matter of "protecting everything" anymore daredtowork Apr 2015 #8

Agreed! LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #10

No, itis protecting what we've won. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #40

Protecting what we have won means keeping another Corporatist DLC dino out of the White House peacebird Apr 2015 #51

I see. 99Forever Apr 2015 #12

hmm. marym625 Apr 2015 #26

Republicans are threatening to revoke the ACA and change Social Security to a voucher. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #41

Ahhh yes... 99Forever Apr 2015 #42

actually it did work fairly well in 2012 dsc Apr 2015 #44

Pardon me, my mistake. 99Forever Apr 2015 #46

Although I completely understand your saying "if" marym625 Apr 2015 #23

It was actually a bit tounge in cheek. 99Forever Apr 2015 #43

No no. not you marym625 Apr 2015 #45

I have noticed her silence. qwlauren35 Apr 2015 #6

Her Silence is Deafening LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #13

Her tenth-percenter owners hifiguy Apr 2015 #20

The objective is to control those they can marym625 Apr 2015 #27

As a Would-Be RobinA Apr 2015 #53

Yes, the browbeating daredtowork Apr 2015 #7

So agree!!! LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #11

Calling Russ Feingold! Fuddnik Apr 2015 #14

+a kazillion! marym625 Apr 2015 #19

Yes. This. Very much this. hifiguy Apr 2015 #29

! Scuba Apr 2015 #50

That would be nice deutsey Apr 2015 #55

+1000 marym625 Apr 2015 #28

Yep, every skeptic immediately became a hater, right-winger, sexist, or paid troll arcane1 Apr 2015 #36

Don't forget your diagnosis of mental illness daredtowork Apr 2015 #38

You said it. I do not like being browbeaten into agreement with others. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #37

Voting Bernie Sanders fbc Apr 2015 #15

I may write him in if he doesn't run marym625 Apr 2015 #18

Me too peacebird Apr 2015 #52

Yep. hifiguy Apr 2015 #21

For Sure... LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #32

+1. Jester Messiah Apr 2015 #35

I'm in for Bernie Sanders. krishnarama Apr 2015 #49

Same here MissDeeds Apr 2015 #54

There is a reason there is no Progressive running,,,,,,,,, nt Cryptoad Apr 2015 #16

And that is? KamaAina Apr 2015 #24

see reply 47 Cryptoad Apr 2015 #48

Please do detail..... LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #31

I hope you right and there are many declare,,,,,,, Cryptoad Apr 2015 #47

K&R marym625 Apr 2015 #17

No Problem.... LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #33

I'm a Democrat and I'm not "falling in line" for Hillary. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #22

HRC just started her campaign by channeling EW and Bernie... polichick Apr 2015 #25

Yes, I wish she had started to channel more progressive ideas erronis Apr 2015 #30

Could be a preemptive strike... polichick Apr 2015 #34

kickity! NYC_SKP May 2015 #56

Thank you! LovingA2andMI May 2015 #57