General Discussion

jamzrockz

(1,333 posts)

25. Look

Tue Apr 14, 2015, 01:14 PM

Apr 2015

I am as anti war as they get and I doubt anyone on DU is as anti war as me. I was against the war in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen., Pakistan, Kosovo etc etc. I am against all aggressive wars and it doesn't matter if a democrat or republican is waging it.

But even a person like me has a red line and that red line is a real armed groups on the march coming towards me and my family. I am talking about the way it is for most Syrians not the preemptive, imaginary, they are will come after me scenario imagined by Bush. When the treat is real and on the way, I am as pro war as you can get. Use everything you got plus the kitchen sink and thrown it at the enemy.

ISIS is no joke, they will eventually kill just about everything you were going to spare by not using chemical weapons on then and they will advance to new areas to kill and enslave new people. You want to kill them hard, fast and without mercy. And unfortunately, civilians will always be caught in the middle.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Strong' evidence of Syria regime chemical attacks: HRW [View all] oberliner Apr 2015 OP

More stuff to get us into war. You know, tear gas is "chemical weapon." nt kelliekat44 Apr 2015 #1

Chlorine gas used as a weapon of war is not "tear gas" nor was"tear gas" mentioned or used. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #4

When these claims are investigated they betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #11

So now HRW is liars???! mylye2222 Apr 2015 #13

Don't know about her personally but she does tend to believe neocon lies betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #15

HRW is "Human Rights Watch." HRC is "Hillary Rodham Clinton." They are not synonymous. Links below: Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #17

Human Rights Watch has a pretty bad record too. betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #18

Opposition to Freeman does not a "track record" make. LanternWaste Apr 2015 #20

Human Rights Watch is already created a questionable track record in Syria itself. betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #22

Pulling out a Jeffry Goldberg, eh. "Some of the most strenuous opposition to Freeman's appointment Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #21

Anything from them on the Depleted Uranium used malaise Apr 2015 #2

Yes, they issued a report about that oberliner Apr 2015 #5

Assad says his government does not drop 'barrel bombs'. I'm sure he will deny that there are pampango Apr 2015 #3

I would like to know who amongst us jamzrockz Apr 2015 #6

Against civilians though? oberliner Apr 2015 #7

Do you mean jamzrockz Apr 2015 #9

No I mean just deliberately targeting civilians oberliner Apr 2015 #12

Chemical weapons in a populated area are an abhorrent war crime. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #8

I think the existence of ISIS jamzrockz Apr 2015 #10

I would. Chemical weapons dropped on Al Nusra or ISIS in Poway, California USA Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #19

But what if the marines jamzrockz Apr 2015 #23

If I wanted someone to make those hard decisions, I would vote for a Bush, Cruz, Paul, or other Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #24

Look jamzrockz Apr 2015 #25

ISIS is no joke. Using Chemical weapons on our own citzens in our own country would be a crime. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #26

Who do you hate more Assad or ISIS? Jesus Malverde Apr 2015 #14

Me personally or Human Rights Watch? oberliner Apr 2015 #16