General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dear Skinner... [View all]daredtowork
(3,732 posts)And the tactics that have been used to maginalize opponents have been discourteous to say the least. And they have been allowed to get away with things listed against the site rules like define people who are not pro-Hillary as Republicans.
As for Skinner's own appearance: sine this web site costs money to run, and the Clinton campaign has loads of cash, I just assumed that is something along the lines of an endorsement that ran on Primary Announcement day on one of THE Democrat enclaves. I don't see why Clinton's staff or Skinner *wouldnt*do that. Even if it wasn't a paid endorsement now, there could be some hope for support of the web site in the future - that just makes sense.
I hope people aren't getting dinged just for expressing opposition during primary season, though. I don't think that would be tbe case from what I've seen before. This thread might get dinged as "disruptive meta", though. :p