Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ukraine: The Truth [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)3. Fracking Planet Earth for Fun and Profit
Things look different when in the light of day.
How Hillary Clinton's State Department Sold Fracking to the World
A trove of secret documents details the US government's global push for shale gas.
By Mariah Blake
Mother Jones | September/October 2014 Issue
EXCERPT...
Clinton, who was sworn in as secretary of state in early 2009, believed that shale gas could help rewrite global energy politics. "This is a moment of profound change," she later told a crowd at Georgetown University. "Countries that used to depend on others for their energy are now producers. How will this shape world events? Who will benefit, and who will not? The answers to these questions are being written right now, and we intend to play a major role." Clinton tapped a lawyer named David Goldwyn as her special envoy for international energy affairs; his charge was "to elevate energy diplomacy as a key function of US foreign policy."
Goldwyn had a long history of promoting drilling overseasboth as a Department of Energy official under Bill Clinton and as a representative of the oil industry. From 2005 to 2009 he directed the US-Libya Business Association, an organization funded primarily by US oil companiesincluding Chevron, Exxon Mobil, and Marathonclamoring to tap Libya's abundant supply. Goldwyn lobbied Congress for pro-Libyan policies and even battled legislation that would have allowed families of the Lockerbie bombing victims to sue the Libyan government for its alleged role in the attack.
According to diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks, one of Goldwyn's first acts at the State Department was gathering oil and gas industry executives "to discuss the potential international impact of shale gas." Clinton then sent a cable to US diplomats, asking them to collect information on the potential for fracking in their host countries. These efforts eventually gave rise to the Global Shale Gas Initiative, which aimed to help other nations develop their shale potential. Clinton promised it would do so "in a way that is as environmentally respectful as possible."
But environmental groups were barely consulted, while industry played a crucial role. When Goldwyn unveiled the initiative in April 2010, it was at a meeting of the United States Energy Association, a trade organization representing Chevron, Exxon Mobil, and ConocoPhillips, all of which were pursuing fracking overseas. Among their top targets was Poland, which preliminary studies suggested had abundant shale gas. The day after Goldwyn's announcement, the US Embassy in Warsaw helped organize a shale gas conference, underwritten by these same companies (plus the oil field services company Halliburton) and attended by officials from the departments of State and Energy.
In some cases, Clinton personally promoted shale gas. During a 2010 gathering of foreign ministers in Washington, DC, she spoke about America's plans to help spread fracking abroad. "I know that in some places is controversial," she said, "but natural gas is the cleanest fossil fuel available for power generation today." She later traveled to Poland for a series of meetings with officials, after which she announced that the country had joined the Global Shale Gas Initiative.
CONTINUED...
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron
The truth is unbearable for those whose heart it outweighs. Among the ancient Egyptians, I once read, was the belief that the soul faced Judgment upon death. A perfect and accurate balance was used, on one scale the deceased's heart, on the other, a feather. If the heart was heavier, the soul would be cast into the void and forgotten. If the feather outweighed the heart, it was a sign of goodness, so the soul would continue existence in additional life.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary Clinton Calls For Greater Military Assistance And Financial Aid For Ukraine
Octafish
Apr 2015
#47
The article reveals nothing except the childish, escapist fantasies of the author.
DetlefK
Apr 2015
#6
No need for ad hominem. Gary Leupp is a professor of history. The guy tells the truth as he sees it.
Octafish
Apr 2015
#8
Oi. That's my point: It seems he intentionally left information out of the discussion.
DetlefK
Apr 2015
#12
Please explain then why Ukrainian fascists killed upwards of 250,000 Ukrainian Jews during
KingCharlemagne
Apr 2015
#16
Even that is giving it too much credit. It's the latest apologia for Putin's war of aggression.
stevenleser
Apr 2015
#21
I'm her even more evil identical triplett. The other two are amateurs when it comes to villainy.
DetlefK
Apr 2015
#27
Does it matter if NATO's expansion is aimed at invading/weakening Russia or is a decision by small
pampango
Apr 2015
#7
STill waiting for the commie hordes to burst into Ukraine like i was told was imminent 6 mos ago.
KG
Apr 2015
#20
NATO is a tool of Empire. If you are in the 'Ownership' class, you got a piece of it.
Octafish
Apr 2015
#41
over 700 military bases all over the world-spends more on its war budget than the rest of the world
EX500rider
Apr 2015
#60
And a lot of that money was spent on humanitarian type aid like vaccinations. It's been in the
okaawhatever
Apr 2015
#31
Except he insinuates that the $5 billion was invested explicitly for regime change in 2014.
Tommy_Carcetti
Apr 2015
#48
Just because that's what you want to argue doesn't make it the point of Leupp's essay.
Octafish
Apr 2015
#50
'I continue to be stunned at how people who oppose war by the US work so hard to justify Russian war
Octafish
Apr 2015
#43
How nice of you to imply I'm pro-Russia when it comes to warmongering. Thank you, no.
Octafish
Apr 2015
#62
"Don't worry if you can't think how it applies to the present situation in Ukraine:"
NuclearDem
Apr 2015
#63