General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]libdem4life
(13,877 posts)cars, farm equipment, houses...anything a consumer need without ultimately donating to the above...sooner or later. It's just life. Some corporation owns just about everything ultimately. It's the Global Economy. Do we want candidates who don't know that and haven't a snowball's chance in you-know-where just to make certain people feel better?
I know people who tried to "live off the land" and/or only buy locally. Guess what, for 99% it's impossible. Now go up the ladder a couple of notches...running for say Mayor. He's got to go to those who have disposable cash and it's not likely much of his electorate. Now, he goes County...same story...higher money/donors necessary...then State...Then National.
That's reality and every single candidate that has 1/2 a chance of winning nationally has to do it...unless they are exceptionally wealthy, and then we'd say they bought the office. Carly Fiorino comes to mind but still didn't win.
Wishing and hoping and hating doesn't change our current economic reality. And even Elizabeth Warren isn't going to be able to do too much but at least nip at their heels.
It's time for some thick skin and grown up logic, not wishful thinking...and attacking based on fantasy.