Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
39. There is a counterargument.
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 06:55 PM
Apr 2015

Many of us on what used to be the center of the Democratic Party and is now referred to as the "left" worked very hard to get Obama elected.

I did. I really worked hard and I am not the youngest.

When he got into office, he appointed people from Wall Street and Rahm Emmanuel as his close aides. He barely tipped his (proverbial) hat to people like me who had worked so hard to get him into the White House. He has been a good president in many respects, but he has not been a progressive president by any means.

Then the Occupy movement began, and the federal government was to say it politely very rude to that grass-roots movement that was, yes, protesting in part, Obama's economic policies that had resulted in so much misery in the country. His policies in dealing with the banks after Bush's and also Bill Clinton's policies in also picking Wall Street economic advisers and repealing Glass-Steagall and then signing an act that allowed the worsening of the media consolidation, all policies that caused our 2008 economic crash. (To say nothing of Bill Clinton's signing of NAFTA.)

I for one, am sick of working hard for the Democratic candidates, and then being told after the election, that my views, my issues, are just not important enough to be addressed favorably. I will not do that again. And I anticipate based on the record of Bill Clinton that Hillary will do precisely that: address my issues in her campaign and then forget about me and the progressive issues I care about once elected.

So that is my beef with Hillary.

Further, I read an article about Hillary's speech before a group of small business owners in Norwalk, Iowa (a place I know well). She broached the topics that are in the news today: the attacks on the ACA, equal pay for women, etc. But she did not venture one step beyond those issues which are uncontroversial within the Democratic Party. I am waiting for her to actually fight for any truly progressive issues say on climate change or the TPP. I am waiting. It is very easy to be for equal pay. It is very hard to write or pass a law that will require it and even harder to enforce such a law. But the issue makes for good press. And as a woman, I certainly want equal pay for women. But to get it you have to deal with a myriad of issues like equal work -- what is that? -- about childcare -- about which parent takes kids to the doctor and misses work -- about the time women take off to care for their children -- about all kinds of issues that are not so easily translated into questions of discrimination. As I said, I am a woman and this is an issue that matters a lot to me, but it is a very complex issue even thought it lends itself easily to a slogan.

Most of all, I fear that Hillary will compromise Social Security. Among the many friends of Bill and Hillary is Pete Peterson, an avid and effective and very wealthy foe of Social Security. She will never admit to being willing to compromise Social Security, but I do not trust her on that issue because of her close ties with Wall Street including her son-in-law's employment.

So there you have it. I am not an extremist. I am an FDR Democrat. And I do not trust Hillary.

Above all, even to those who do like Hillary, be wary. It is utterly important that we vet our candidates and make sure they will fight for our interests once they are in office. We live in times of great corruption. We must be very careful about who we trust to wield the power of the White House.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Amen! leftofcool Apr 2015 #1
My mom lived to 90, God Bless her... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #2
Yeah! that marym625 Apr 2015 #5
In the primary marym625 Apr 2015 #3
This is my age talking but I like to think it is upaloopa Apr 2015 #12
The difference being marym625 Apr 2015 #19
Bah...70 is the new 50 B2G Apr 2015 #4
That's what the guy on Craigslist keeps telling the women. n/t jtuck004 Apr 2015 #27
That's how we got here. jeff47 Apr 2015 #6
+a kazillion! marym625 Apr 2015 #9
Sounds nice but you are wrong. It takes center right money to win upaloopa Apr 2015 #13
If it 'takes center right money to win' Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #42
Which is why CA's governor is Meg Whitman and not Jerry Brown. jeff47 Apr 2015 #55
I hope you are well. MADem Apr 2015 #7
Like that Johnny Cash song upaloopa Apr 2015 #14
Wise words. Scurrilous Apr 2015 #8
+1 It really is a long-term process, often requiring small steps. But set-backs are guaranteed Hoyt Apr 2015 #10
I'm 71 and will vote for my principles. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #11
Repeating other people's words is nice upaloopa Apr 2015 #15
Should I be discreet and not vote for my principles? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #16
It's your vote do what you want with it. upaloopa Apr 2015 #17
Good. So will I vote for my principles. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #18
Well I don't think your principles will be on the ballot. upaloopa Apr 2015 #21
We'll see. I expect they will. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #37
What else do you have? paulbibeau Apr 2015 #58
I don't think there were parties when Adams made that statement. The names of all the candidates jwirr Apr 2015 #25
+1000 heaven05 Apr 2015 #20
I am 76 and plan to be around RebelOne Apr 2015 #22
thanks for the perspective oopaloopa! KnR secondwind Apr 2015 #23
I just realized at 73 I am likely to be in the same boat. We need to win this one on every level we jwirr Apr 2015 #24
I am not saying we should not push for upaloopa Apr 2015 #26
Yes, I hear you. There are two goals here that both need to be met if possible. First we need to jwirr Apr 2015 #29
upaloopa, you make a good point. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #28
Yes. Relax. Anything can happen between lovemydog Apr 2015 #30
I think I don't need to relax much more than I am. upaloopa Apr 2015 #35
There is a counterargument. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #39
Amen. paulbibeau Apr 2015 #57
Sometimes it's really true... world wide wally Apr 2015 #31
Yes Thespian2 Apr 2015 #32
You and me both, upaloopa. I'm only a few years younger than you, but... Hekate Apr 2015 #33
I disagree whole heartedly olddots Apr 2015 #34
Why not wait to see what other Democrats declare, and then who actually wins 99th_Monkey Apr 2015 #36
I meant to speak to people who aren't going to support upaloopa Apr 2015 #38
"I know things aren't as progressive (and) Hillary isn't as progressive as we would like" 99th_Monkey Apr 2015 #40
We aren't going to have a progressive upaloopa Apr 2015 #41
I know , I know 99th_Monkey Apr 2015 #43
Get real! Even Bernie Sanders said what upaloopa Apr 2015 #44
I guess my point is 99th_Monkey Apr 2015 #60
+1. People who claim to be "compromising" now are doing nothing of the sort. Marr Apr 2015 #59
If the GOP win in 2016, there will be no nation to host a president. The complete dissolution of the freshwest Apr 2015 #45
It depends. Savannahmann Apr 2015 #46
Time outs. joshcryer Apr 2015 #47
Leave your legacy, upaloopa…. MrMickeysMom Apr 2015 #48
K&R B Calm Apr 2015 #49
Funny how I draw the opposite conclusions. 99Forever Apr 2015 #50
What will the legacy of our choices be? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #51
"Political expediency?" 99Forever Apr 2015 #54
Lombardi always regretted saying that. ScreamingMeemie Apr 2015 #52
Every time I cast a vote LWolf Apr 2015 #53
ssdd. PowerToThePeople Apr 2015 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»2016 may be the last time...»Reply #39