Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A million people killed. Damn. How do you live with it? [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)42. I hear that! What in hell was I thinkin'?
Last edited Thu Apr 16, 2015, 06:46 AM - Edit history (1)
Address to the Nation on the Invasion of Iraq (January 16, 1991)
George H. W. Bush
Just 2 hours ago, allied air forces began an attack on military targets in Iraq and Kuwait. These attacks continue as I speak. Ground forces are not engaged.
This conflict started August 2d when the dictator of Iraq invaded a small and helpless neighbor. Kuwaita member of the Arab League and a member of the United Nationswas crushed; its people, brutalized. Five months ago, Saddam Hussein started this cruel war against Kuwait. Tonight, the battle has been joined.
much more at:
http://www.millercenter.org/president/speeches/speech-3428
transcript: President Clinton explains Iraq strike
CLINTON: Good evening.
Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.
much more at:
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
more at:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026211673
Senate vote on 2002 AUMF at:
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/107-2002/s237
House vote on 2002 AUMF at:
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/107/hjres114
10:16 P.M. EST
THE PRESIDENT: My fellow citizens, at this hour, American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger.
On my orders, coalition forces have begun striking selected targets of military importance to undermine Saddam Hussein's ability to wage war. These are opening stages of what will be a broad and concerted campaign. More than 35 countries are giving crucial support -- from the use of naval and air bases, to help with intelligence and logistics, to the deployment of combat units. Every nation in this coalition has chosen to bear the duty and share the honor of serving in our common defense.
more at http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030319-17.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
143 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just hold your nose and forget the dead, the tortured, the maimed. It was "smart" politics.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Apr 2015
#1
God forbid the smart thing to do would have been to avoid all that carnage and spending.
merrily
Apr 2015
#15
We know the Japanese PM did because Japan is totally independent of us and politicians never fudge.
merrily
Apr 2015
#25
Some may have bought it, which means they weren't fit for that office, others though imo, supported
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#110
No it is not an excuse at all. Tony Blair is as much of a war criminal as our own criminals.
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#111
That is fine, though bush/cheney WOULD have invaded Iraq regardless. They said so. However, my
still_one
Apr 2015
#119
The history of Europe is one of brutal Imperial Colonialism. And now we are taking over where they
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#120
We have. We've gone from fisticuffs and throwing stones to nuclear weapons and killer drones.
merrily
Apr 2015
#18
The argument made here is that it wasn't so much about 'getting' the oil, as it had to do with
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2015
#27
In regards to what you're talking about and the context of the upcoming primary season
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2015
#34
Yep. Finally, yet enough ahead of the primary roll out that it might not leap to mind now.
merrily
Apr 2015
#39
And 'mistake' can mean many things. Please note that she has never apologized
KingCharlemagne
Apr 2015
#121
Once you vote for a needless war that explodes a region and gives rise to new terrorist groups, etc.
merrily
Apr 2015
#123
HRC knew better at the time but she chose to place her ambition over humanity. That's
KingCharlemagne
Apr 2015
#124
Like all those in Congress who did that when theyvoted to start the Iraq War without a clue how to
merrily
Apr 2015
#35
If you want to stop this sort of thing, you'll need to stop being staggered,
struggle4progress
Apr 2015
#13
Maybe you should read up on the 1912 Basel Congress: the members of the Second International
struggle4progress
Apr 2015
#37
In his essay, Bonhoeffer quite rightly points out that one has an obligation
struggle4progress
Apr 2015
#50
Yes, we do have that obligation. What are you doing to meet it, assuming you are as horrified as
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#109
Yes, clearly, government does not respond quickly to public opinion, if at all,
merrily
Apr 2015
#28
There is no one such thing as "government" here, so it is unlikely to figure prominently
struggle4progress
Apr 2015
#44
There was nothing wrong with protesting the war, but it proved ineffective
struggle4progress
Apr 2015
#52
As the war dragged on and our defeat started looming ever larger, my protest tactics
KingCharlemagne
Apr 2015
#125
As to war, the two such things as goverment here are Congress and the President.
merrily
Apr 2015
#46
Congress consists of 535 distinct persons, whose views are not entirely homogeneous
struggle4progress
Apr 2015
#48
If there is no way to fight back, then how on earth are people supposed to keep that obligation to
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#112
No I didn't really notice that, though I did notice that were an awful lot of Republicans in
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#142
Oh god how I long for the days when I could tell myself it was just "him" and "them".
Bonobo
Apr 2015
#31
If we round them up into one place, it will be easier to know who they are. nt
msanthrope
Apr 2015
#63
How about we just prosecute our own lying war criminals and keep our noses out of other people's
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#106
You know this is a PRIMARY and no one is talking about reasons to vote Republican, right?
merrily
Apr 2015
#43
I know you don't mean this, but that seems like an attempt to hijack this thread or get it locked
merrily
Apr 2015
#54
I definitely don't think this thread should be locked. Not at all....but I'll say this...
Cali_Democrat
Apr 2015
#56
You are right, it is unusual. I don't think most folks, when they read a thread go
still_one
Apr 2015
#61
No thanks. Democratic peons like me didn't berate anyone for being "doves," only for being
merrily
Apr 2015
#70
"Our candidates feel they have to posture like hawks even when wooing Democrats."
merrily
Apr 2015
#74
The Third Way controls too much of the party, and has for a long time. There's your answer. n/t
nomorenomore08
Apr 2015
#114
Maybe, but that was a top down thing. It wasn't that hawkish Democratic voters pressured
merrily
Apr 2015
#116
in a nation that was not white, he was a man.... right? this is not rocket science shit.
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#89
excellent. yes. and thank you, back at you for dotting the i's and crossing the t's. nt
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#137
