Ahem, we can stop now with the latest Hillary outrage #regulationgate......

[Half-Century Man]

20. The larger the artifical entity, the greater the restraints on it's potential.

You don't use the leash you use on your toy poodle, to restrain your tiger.
Why can't any politician use a simple clarification?

Because she is employing a very old American political strategy, say things which can mean several things depending on who hears them.
To would be entrepreneurs: I'll help you
To existing small businesses: I'll protect you
To big business: I'll free you
To economists: More potential for growth
To small government advocates: Less control from above
The statement is too vague to be of real use. It can be expanded upon or retreated from with ease. It is just a political tool.

Judged by itself, an attempt to appeal to a wider range of voters is not a bad thing. Seen in the context of where that has taken the United States over the last 40 some odd years. For a great deal of the politically aware, the vagueness is unsatisfactory.