General Discussion

abakan

(1,996 posts)

35. Why people think these two have a conflict?

Thu Apr 16, 2015, 11:54 AM

Apr 2015

Because they are both women. There is this culture that loves nothing more than to pit one woman against another. If there is no conflict they will make one up and try to sell it to who ever will listen. Like children in a school yard screaming, GIRL FIGHT!
The mentality is adolescent and fits the Repubs to a tee.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

81 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton Praises 'Progressive Champion' Elizabeth Warren [View all] kpete Apr 2015 OP

Blah blah! mylye2222 Apr 2015 #1

Or she really admires Elizabeth Warren. MineralMan Apr 2015 #6

Warren didnt seemed 100% ready for Hillary lately. mylye2222 Apr 2015 #7

You're incorrect. You're projecting MineralMan Apr 2015 #9

I just wish we had seen more action from HRC before the campaign started erronis Apr 2015 #36

EW has already endorsed HRC. They play different roles within the Democratic Party. EW is great at freshwest Apr 2015 #14

Link to her endorsement of Hillary? morningfog Apr 2015 #15

Elizabeth has not endorsed Hillary. AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #56

you are right. Helen Borg Apr 2015 #66

A later date Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #72

Again, not an endorsement. AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #74

Yes, she has, which is why I know that she'll support MineralMan Apr 2015 #18

Link to Warren's endorsement of Hillary? morningfog Apr 2015 #68

Here is one, there are more Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #71

I think you are overstating it. morningfog Apr 2015 #75

hey, you wanted a link. Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #76

And it is not an endorsement. morningfog Apr 2015 #77

Just threading the needle, huh. Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #79

Why people think these two have a conflict? abakan Apr 2015 #35

I see your point, but I think it's because Warren is fighting Wall Street while Hillary has appeared DesertDiamond Apr 2015 #37

That is EXACTLY the reason. Anyone who doesn't see that hasn't been paying attention. whathehell Apr 2015 #80

Agreed. These Democrats have the same goals and work together. Good analyis on the origin. n/t freshwest Apr 2015 #38

Respectfully, I have to disagree with you. pennylane100 Apr 2015 #52

everyone is entitled to their opinion abakan Apr 2015 #54

I see this, too. Two Powerful Women...Oh noes. Even Caroline Kennedy was tagged with libdem4life Apr 2015 #64

I think you'll find that the Left's populism is sweepting the country and that their support of sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #78

What??? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2015 #11

Know Them By Their Actions...Not Their Words billhicks76 Apr 2015 #51

She's right. E.W. is doing great things in the Senate. MineralMan Apr 2015 #2

Hillary is correct! leftofcool Apr 2015 #3

Elizabeth Warren deserves praise. democrank Apr 2015 #4

Of Course. Liz deserves praise. mylye2222 Apr 2015 #5

I assume that a former Republican like Warren sees Hillary as one of the women who pulled her Bluenorthwest Apr 2015 #16

Hilary the Goldwater girl pulled Warren left , thats Rich. bahrbearian Apr 2015 #22

Yea, when she was 16 and not old enough to vote. leftofcool Apr 2015 #26

Sure bahrbearian Apr 2015 #40

What were the Republicans like in 1965? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2015 #45

I hear/read this one a lot. tazkcmo Apr 2015 #33

Well someone or something did, Liz was a Reagan/Bush Republican until she was pushing 50. Bluenorthwest Apr 2015 #46

I think this is how EW went left she followed Hillary, Hillary was Democrat in Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #73

Still claiming you know how Elizabeth voted I see. AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #58

She was already as Far Left as Liz Warren... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2015 #12

Baseless conjecture. Fearless Apr 2015 #13

HRC's farther left than EW per Ballotpedia. Warren is more Populist. I researched it: freshwest Apr 2015 #19

Exactly.... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2015 #44

Nonsense. Hillary is a neoliberal. AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #59

K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2015 #8

praised the woman in the Senate promoting/furthering the cause of corporate financial regulation? bigtree Apr 2015 #10

Right on! Orsino Apr 2015 #17

Good on her! riqster Apr 2015 #20

Love it! Thanks Hillary.. My Senator is a good one! boston bean Apr 2015 #21

Talk is cheap. Will Hillary walk the (latest) talk? L0oniX Apr 2015 #23

Talk Isn't Always Cheap saintsebastian Apr 2015 #29

+1 "Goldman Sachs once paid $200,000 to hear former Secretary Clinton do a little talking" L0oniX Apr 2015 #30

Either that or her feet will be in the fire dreamnightwind Apr 2015 #48

but will she vote for Warren for POTUS in '16? PowerToThePeople Apr 2015 #24

Hillary don't forget Glass-Steagell. jwirr Apr 2015 #25

I think Elizabeth is the best-now send money! jalan48 Apr 2015 #27

What will be the reaction, I wonder, when Warren campaigns for HRC? MADem Apr 2015 #28

She will be thrown under the bus. leftofcool Apr 2015 #31

Warren was hypnotized from HRC minions Iliyah Apr 2015 #43

... or when Hillary campaigns for Elizabeth AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #60

Warren has said she's not running. What part of NO doesn't mean NO to a liberal or MADem Apr 2015 #69

Right, and pols change (or make up) their minds all the time AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #70

Not after they've said NO over fifty times. But how quick you went to the personal!! MADem Apr 2015 #81

very good move samsingh Apr 2015 #32

while "centrist" hatemongering bullies HERE attack progressives as party traitors... carolinayellowdog Apr 2015 #34

"Sen. Warren, are you or will you be running for vice-president?" nt ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2015 #39

A WTF???? paragraph in the Guardian article mak3cats Apr 2015 #41

Check it out, it's puke worthy. herding cats Apr 2015 #42

It totally sucks that our party enables a creep like Paul dreamnightwind Apr 2015 #49

The great thing about Rand Paul. joshcryer Apr 2015 #50

Talk is cheap customerserviceguy Apr 2015 #47

Still Say... Clinton/Warren.... nm Rosco T. Apr 2015 #53

not a chance AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #61

If only Hillary Clinton were Elizabeth Warren. If only. delrem Apr 2015 #55

Heads explode!! treestar Apr 2015 #57

So which statement would be more reflective of actual policies Clinton would pursue as POUS JonLP24 Apr 2015 #62

When HRC takes action to follow Sen. Warren's lead, I'll be impressed. 99Forever Apr 2015 #63

Records show Warren may be following Hillary's lead, are you impressed now Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #65

It's a page from LBJ's playbook. cloudbase Apr 2015 #67