Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Angel Martin

(942 posts)
8. what Warren is proposing is fine
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 03:37 PM
Apr 2015

but it doesn't really address the huge systematic risks that remain in the financial sector.

CEO pay is fine but won't reduce systematic risk.

the predatory auto loans are systematic risk. unfortunately the domestic auto cos. have the lowest income customers with the worst credit. the predatory loans are supporting their sales to a significant extent so those loans are going to be hard to stop.

high frequency trading is systematic risk. the financial transactions tax may put a dent in high frequency trading (or just move it to London).

but, the biggest source of systematic risk i see is that there is ten trillion of US dollar denominated debt lent by offshore lenders to offshore borrowers. a lot of those borrowers were in the oil industry so their revenues have collapsed as the oil price has fallen. also, all of those borrowers are in countries where the currency has fallen against the dollar. so dollar denominated debts are harder to pay back.

if there is a financial crisis denominated in dollars, it will hurt the US economy, even if it happens offshore.

needless to say, Warren doesn't have anything right now that strengthens the financial sector against that kind of offshore crisis.

but, i wish Warren would run. she's the only one who seems to understand that there are big risks remaining in the financial sector.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is why I have so little faith in HRC Kelvin Mace Apr 2015 #1
Clinton is a very cautious politican. She waits to see where the wind is coming from cali Apr 2015 #2
Precisely Kelvin Mace Apr 2015 #9
Read this on TPM yesterday. AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #11
Funny then, that Warren thinks she's a good choice for President... brooklynite Apr 2015 #3
Warren was very tepid about Clinton in an interview last week. cali Apr 2015 #5
I wouldn't call her endorsement very emphatic Kelvin Mace Apr 2015 #7
"Hillary is terrific" brooklynite Apr 2015 #10
"She is terrific" Kelvin Mace Apr 2015 #12
I never used the word "endorsed"...I said she thought Hillary would be a good choice. brooklynite Apr 2015 #14
OK, could you point me to where she says that Kelvin Mace Apr 2015 #15
You're right..."terrific" is a much better word. brooklynite Apr 2015 #17
Well, there is the unasked question: Kelvin Mace Apr 2015 #18
She can choose anyone... brooklynite Apr 2015 #19
Again, unasked questions Kelvin Mace Apr 2015 #21
more recently: cali Apr 2015 #13
Here's a quote from a year later. Savannahmann Apr 2015 #23
I wouldn't require her to be at the forefront, even. Orsino Apr 2015 #4
I hope she's successful renegade000 Apr 2015 #6
what Warren is proposing is fine Angel Martin Apr 2015 #8
Well, her proposal Kelvin Mace Apr 2015 #16
Welcome to DU, Angel Martin! calimary Apr 2015 #20
thanks calimary Angel Martin Apr 2015 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Warren Lays Out Ambitious...»Reply #8