Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton Praises 'Progressive Champion' Elizabeth Warren [View all]Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)46. Well someone or something did, Liz was a Reagan/Bush Republican until she was pushing 50.
So she sure as shit was to the right of Hillary for many long years. That's a given. So maybe she had a 'road to Damascus' moment, or read a moving account of the life of Eugene Debs, I do not know. Somehow, someway, Warren moved from the Republican right wing to where she is today. Hillary aside, Warren is way more progressive than she was when she was a Supply Sider.
Do you know her narrative? Start with the years of Reagan's inaction about AIDS, end with her pulling everyone else to the left, tie the two together for me. In the middle, explain how she 'earned' her millions. Thanks!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
EW has already endorsed HRC. They play different roles within the Democratic Party. EW is great at
freshwest
Apr 2015
#14
I see your point, but I think it's because Warren is fighting Wall Street while Hillary has appeared
DesertDiamond
Apr 2015
#37
That is EXACTLY the reason. Anyone who doesn't see that hasn't been paying attention.
whathehell
Apr 2015
#80
Agreed. These Democrats have the same goals and work together. Good analyis on the origin. n/t
freshwest
Apr 2015
#38
I see this, too. Two Powerful Women...Oh noes. Even Caroline Kennedy was tagged with
libdem4life
Apr 2015
#64
I think you'll find that the Left's populism is sweepting the country and that their support of
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#78
I assume that a former Republican like Warren sees Hillary as one of the women who pulled her
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#16
Well someone or something did, Liz was a Reagan/Bush Republican until she was pushing 50.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#46
I think this is how EW went left she followed Hillary, Hillary was Democrat in
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#73
HRC's farther left than EW per Ballotpedia. Warren is more Populist. I researched it:
freshwest
Apr 2015
#19
praised the woman in the Senate promoting/furthering the cause of corporate financial regulation?
bigtree
Apr 2015
#10
+1 "Goldman Sachs once paid $200,000 to hear former Secretary Clinton do a little talking"
L0oniX
Apr 2015
#30
Warren has said she's not running. What part of NO doesn't mean NO to a liberal or
MADem
Apr 2015
#69
Not after they've said NO over fifty times. But how quick you went to the personal!!
MADem
Apr 2015
#81
while "centrist" hatemongering bullies HERE attack progressives as party traitors...
carolinayellowdog
Apr 2015
#34
So which statement would be more reflective of actual policies Clinton would pursue as POUS
JonLP24
Apr 2015
#62
Records show Warren may be following Hillary's lead, are you impressed now
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#65