Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

treestar

(82,383 posts)
298. And they can post with impunity on a board for Democrats
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:54 AM
Apr 2015

It's amazing how they whine at any argument back. That silly thread the other day that came from the Populist Group about the the Hillary supporters are oppressing them! Hilarious. They expect no argument or they are oppressed. Similar to right wingers complaining about persecution of Christians in America today.

We do...nt SidDithers Apr 2015 #1
I was unaware of that group until this thread, so just for fun, I jotted down ... 11 Bravo Apr 2015 #11
Oooo, you were able to spot poster who openly criticize Hillary. Impressive. merrily Apr 2015 #253
Relax, you weren't on the list. Hell, I never heard of you. 11 Bravo Apr 2015 #321
Bullshit... snooper2 Apr 2015 #325
Much appreciated. I guess life is such a dream for him, that slipped his mind. merrily Apr 2015 #329
Patting yourself on the back for spotting the obvious was so mockworthy, I could not resist. merrily Apr 2015 #328
I wasn't going to respond to you, but this is so ... 11 Bravo Apr 2015 #355
Awww. so adorable. merrily Apr 2015 #356
Interesting, the list I mean. I suggest we call it the Blue List. nm rhett o rick Apr 2015 #354
Could you link to that group? I've asked already, but so far no link. Thanks! sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #31
Check your profile page...nt SidDithers Apr 2015 #36
So there is no such group. That's what I thought. Thanks. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #45
They are avoiding using the word "Populist". It's a nasty word to some here. nm rhett o rick Apr 2015 #359
I think we just got a populist presidential candidate! So, they will be hearing the word a lot. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #360
Yes this is meta. But I don't believe that meta threads are verbotten, only disruptive meta. rhett o rick Apr 2015 #361
Heh joshcryer Apr 2015 #88
Indeed. zappaman Apr 2015 #101
lol treestar Apr 2015 #136
I'm gonna need a co-host. Interested? NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #38
Lol, seems some people have a vivid imagination around here. I have a feeling an 'I don't like sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #73
I'm having second thoughts about it now that I read the suggestion for a mayonnaise group. NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #78
Isn't this a meta thread btw? I have been told that Meta is not allowed in GD? But it's so fun I sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #86
meta? a group on du encouraging people not to vote, split the party? i think it is important seabeyond Apr 2015 #93
This OP is bashing DUers. The entire thread is bashing DUers. That as far as I have been told, is sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #95
the thread is calling out dems that advocate not voting if clinton wins the primary. that state seabeyond Apr 2015 #99
The thread is meta. So it's okay now to post meta threads in DU. Fine with me, but I hope no one sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #217
Liberals always get it twisted. Only meta that is pro-Hillary or anti Hillary supporters is merrily Apr 2015 #255
Skinner will announce when that part of the TOS comes into effect: freshwest Apr 2015 #225
Definitely DU has changed regarding trashing Democrats, like Kucinich eg, I couldn't believe the sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #257
Call out of other DUers or certain kinds of posts, etc. is the very definiton of meta on DU. merrily Apr 2015 #256
I would love to see some call out the other kinds of posts. KMOD Apr 2015 #259
WTF? I've never made a single positive post about Webb. Search DU. merrily Apr 2015 #260
It's "your team" Warren DeMontague Apr 2015 #282
I am not Jesus. I don't come here to suffer the lash on behalf of every liberal poster. merrily Apr 2015 #286
Get off your jock? KMOD Apr 2015 #333
Yep. an expression used by a woman in a reality show that I found funny. merrily Apr 2015 #336
Yes meta. There is no such a group in DU. Those promoting that idea are trying to rhett o rick Apr 2015 #357
Meta threads are allowed if they support a certain perspective. However if the Meta thread rhett o rick Apr 2015 #351
Members of PU, lol KMOD Apr 2015 #89
Recommends isn't the same as "agree with" Cosmic Kitten Apr 2015 #103
Many were most certainly agreeing with the KMOD Apr 2015 #106
My only point is a "Rec" is not the same as "agree with" Cosmic Kitten Apr 2015 #107
I understand that. KMOD Apr 2015 #116
Even a broken clock is right twice a day... Cosmic Kitten Apr 2015 #117
Ahhh, see now KMOD Apr 2015 #122
+1. nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #124
Yes, I just read on that OP by a rw Hack that got Hidden.. that 27 had Rec it but then it went back Cha Apr 2015 #183
Ironic Bobbie Jo Apr 2015 #189
They just can't stay out of the rw crap pile.. too bad it says more about them than their target. Cha Apr 2015 #195
... greatauntoftriplets Apr 2015 #327
Wasn't it President OBama who said tha Reagan had some "good ideas"? bvar22 May 2015 #362
RW crap getting rec'd KMOD Apr 2015 #192
As someone stated.. " In their animus toward Hillary Clinton they have become Cha Apr 2015 #213
unhinged and KMOD Apr 2015 #214
I know. bc of the DU thought police, I started to post "rec only for visibility"" on some threads. merrily Apr 2015 #261
Lol..Ok THAT IS REALLY HOW LOW SOME WILL GO?? misterhighwasted Apr 2015 #132
Thankfully, the thread was self deleted. KMOD Apr 2015 #181
Why are they welcome here on DU? Ted Cruz statements are more valid than the Dem that misterhighwasted Apr 2015 #190
It really does seem like some here do. KMOD Apr 2015 #193
I will look at the vile repuke quoting group here, and then look at Hllary Rodham Clinton's fan base misterhighwasted Apr 2015 #196
Why don't you ask the owner of the board? merrily Apr 2015 #262
It was a Hide.. unless you're talking about another rw thread? Cha Apr 2015 #197
There was another thread that linked to KMOD Apr 2015 #201
Oh, sorry.. Thanks KMOD.. and sorry I missed that thread.. Cha Apr 2015 #203
I sent you a PM KMOD Apr 2015 #204
thank you.. that was disgusting and really glad it was self-deleted! Cha Apr 2015 #209
Dude, guess what. Warren DeMontague Apr 2015 #284
There's nobody who would join an I don't like Liz or Bernie group treestar Apr 2015 #137
Exactly! Andy823 Apr 2015 #141
This ^ ^ ^ ^ Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2015 #160
They are RW Stink. They really want a RW Pres 2016. misterhighwasted Apr 2015 #191
So is your post. merrily Apr 2015 #307
There is no one who would join an 'I don't like Hillary' either. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #218
Why would they need to? KMOD Apr 2015 #219
I have not seen anyone say 'I don't like Hillary'. I HAVE seen people say, as I have, 'I do not like sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #223
There have been some very ridiculous comments made. KMOD Apr 2015 #226
Then her supporters need to stop attacking everyone who disagrees with her on certain policies. That sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #229
I only see a handful of posters who go on the offensive for her. KMOD Apr 2015 #230
The best DUers are gone. The level of discourse isn't likely to improve. I am still here only sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #231
OK, well obviously I'm new here, KMOD Apr 2015 #234
I do see it. But I see it as a response. Because I, who have never attacked anyone personally sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #235
I often think that it would be funny, and interesting, if the whole board started all over. KMOD Apr 2015 #242
That happened on Discussionist, the other forum started by the Admins. Skinner even advised sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #244
+1 merrily Apr 2015 #268
I disagree treestar Apr 2015 #301
If you don't want pros and cons, you can post the thread safely in the Hillary Group. merrily Apr 2015 #265
I have no idea what you are talking about. KMOD Apr 2015 #332
Oh they need to just shut up and agree treestar Apr 2015 #300
Non issue. Most of us haven't met these people personally treestar Apr 2015 #299
And they can post with impunity on a board for Democrats treestar Apr 2015 #298
Let's just say I disagree with that treestar Apr 2015 #296
Hillary supporters dislike enthusiasm about another candidate. merrily Apr 2015 #263
What enthusiasm for another candidate? treestar Apr 2015 #297
Its on the board. Sorry if you missed it. merrily Apr 2015 #302
No, you made it up treestar Apr 2015 #303
Untrue. I made nothing up. merrily Apr 2015 #310
We have had a I don't like Obama group for YEARS! sheshe2 Apr 2015 #207
Don't forget the I hate DUers group Autumn Apr 2015 #341
I'll pitch in. merrily Apr 2015 #254
Yep. nt treestar Apr 2015 #135
So easy to avoid it, too, yet Hillary Groupers can't seem to get enough of it, between merrily Apr 2015 #258
I do avoid it. I've never posted in the anti-Hillary Group... SidDithers Apr 2015 #304
If there is a DU group that is immune to tombstones, it ain't liberals. merrily Apr 2015 #308
Apology accepted...nt SidDithers Apr 2015 #314
Aw,come 'ere, ya big lug! merrily Apr 2015 #317
Surely if such a group exists you would be more than willing to link to it. Second request sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #330
Check your profile page...nt SidDithers Apr 2015 #331
I'm a member of five groups, all approved by the admins. Now where is this one that is NOT approved sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #337
There is already such a group, though its title doesn't have her name. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #2
So why do they have to post in GD that they are upaloopa Apr 2015 #3
their goal is "burning Hillary to the ground"--that's an exact quote geek tragedy Apr 2015 #7
Awwwwww. I've never been quoted before. Chan790 Apr 2015 #350
It's all about keeping the pot stirred up Andy823 Apr 2015 #14
same "anti Obama" crowd. unsurprisingly, they are the ones i have battled in dismissing, derailing seabeyond Apr 2015 #19
Yes Andy823 Apr 2015 #23
There is a Hillary group too, so why do they have to post in GD they are voting for Hillary? sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #16
she is a democrat and party of our democratic party, which is what this democratic board is about. seabeyond Apr 2015 #21
Then show us the rule that if you support another Democrat over Hillary you cannot post in GD. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #25
encouraging people not to vote for a dem in pres elections, encouraging a split in the party, seabeyond Apr 2015 #28
so it's Hillary or leave? backwoodsbob Apr 2015 #44
says who? seabeyond Apr 2015 #50
LOL Sabrina Puglover Apr 2015 #313
True, but here's the way I see it. If you have faith in your candidate, you don't need to adapt sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #323
Agreed. Puglover Apr 2015 #324
You nailed it. I will not caucus for Hillary in the primary but should she win the nomination Autumn Apr 2015 #343
So are many other potential candidates. Are you saying there is only one Democrat in the Democratic sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #57
no where did i say she is the only. check the hyperbole. nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #63
This Democratic board is also about liberal discussion Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #147
third party, advocating a split in democratic party, advocating not voting in election is also seabeyond Apr 2015 #163
And that is the conundrum Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #175
Not necessarily can't remember. Democrats who have contempt for Democrats who are not center right. merrily Apr 2015 #267
Then alert and/or bring it to the attention of the board owner who wrote the rules. merrily Apr 2015 #289
Art, Bernie Sanders is right there, KMOD Apr 2015 #188
I'm not so sure I can agree that "young people will not vote Republican" Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #248
Progress happens slowly, sadly. KMOD Apr 2015 #250
Especially since the Clintonites/New Democrats took over the Democratic Party, sadly. merrily Apr 2015 #269
Based on that logic, the same would have been true of Joe Lieberman. Bonobo Apr 2015 #180
One thing Andy823 Apr 2015 #22
What do you mean by 'bashing'?? Is it 'bashing' now to say you would prefer another candidate? sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #27
how about her supporters dont want to worry their pretty brain over it, .... or any of the other seabeyond Apr 2015 #33
I don't know what you are talking about. As a Democrat, capital 'D' I am of the opinion that our sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #65
more hyperbole. i look forward to primary race and debates, as i have repeatedly stated. clearly seabeyond Apr 2015 #71
Great, I read your posts as saying no one who doesn't support Hillary as the only candidate sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #77
you did not actually READ my posts, if you came to that conclusion, a NUMBER of times seabeyond Apr 2015 #80
Now I'm reading YOU accusing ME of telling people not to vote, of telling people that 'both parties sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #84
are you stating you have never encouraged people to not vote, if it is clinton, or that both parties seabeyond Apr 2015 #94
Links please, you made a claim, attempting to avoid presenting proof, isn't working. YOU made the sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #96
ha. you cannot answer my question sabrina? it really is pretty damn simple. seabeyond Apr 2015 #100
So you made a false claim. I knew that, just wanted an admission. Thanks. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #105
Prove it... Caretha Apr 2015 #168
Sabrina deserves better. Link-it. WillTwain Apr 2015 #247
+1. I've thought about moving to San Antonio, but never Amarillo. merrily Apr 2015 #280
What would you call it Andy823 Apr 2015 #40
'Someone' who is this 'someone'? Surely you are not confusing people expressing their opinions of sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #67
Well there are number of Andy823 Apr 2015 #131
Actually Andy823 Apr 2015 #340
i am not a clinton supporter either, BUT.... i am a democratic supporter. yes. seabeyond Apr 2015 #32
I'm still waiting for that link to the claims you made about me. I will check back again but you sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #342
Exactly ... and, unsurprisingly, you also hit a nerve. JoePhilly Apr 2015 #43
yes. exactly. bring bernie in. i would love to see what he has in the debates, and chance. seabeyond Apr 2015 #49
Yup ... Love to see Bernie, and anyone else jump in. JoePhilly Apr 2015 #109
You are right Andy823 Apr 2015 #52
+10000 treestar Apr 2015 #138
Funny. I see that all the time. merrily Apr 2015 #270
No it is not silly. Hillary is the only announced upaloopa Apr 2015 #24
LOL! As if this all started Sunday evening. merrily Apr 2015 #271
It's funny how so many of them are anti-Obama, anti-Hillary & simultaneously pro-Putin. Go figure. Tarheel_Dem Apr 2015 #91
+ 1 Billion stevenleser Apr 2015 #353
GD is not the Hillary Group. Hillary supporters fight us in the Populist Group tho. merrily Apr 2015 #264
This message was self-deleted by its author ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2015 #322
So there's an 'I don't like Hillary group' without her name. Whose name does it have? That's sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #51
we do. i was made aware of it a couple days ago. nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #4
Found it upaloopa Apr 2015 #8
be to the dems what teabagger are to repugs. discourage voting. both party the same. seabeyond Apr 2015 #12
No, that would be the center right. Koch brothers fund them both. merrily Apr 2015 #272
Did you see the one post Andy823 Apr 2015 #17
Yes! greatauntoftriplets Apr 2015 #56
Could you link to that group? Thanks. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #18
This one? snooper2 Apr 2015 #326
What is all the hoopla about? I don't get it. The election is aways down the line. pinto Apr 2015 #5
Hate can't wait. Neither can authoritan impetus to message control. merrily Apr 2015 #273
Uh oh, PUMA Alert. libdem4life Apr 2015 #6
I found the I don't like Hillary group maybe you can too upaloopa Apr 2015 #10
The PUMAS are back! blkmusclmachine Apr 2015 #9
Two great minds...one thought. I just beat you by 5 minutes...LOL :) libdem4life Apr 2015 #13
How do you figure that? BainsBane Apr 2015 #34
lol, no kidding. It's like a scent that take you right back to where you Marr Apr 2015 #184
Did they leave? merrily Apr 2015 #274
Maybe people should stop stirring shit against both supporters cali Apr 2015 #15
Goddamnit Cali paulbibeau Apr 2015 #30
lol. I hold lots of strong opinions. cali Apr 2015 #39
You do, but you totally express them calmly and coolly... paulbibeau Apr 2015 #87
She does that H2O Man Apr 2015 #118
ha! look who's talking, mr. cool, collected kind and reasonable himself cali Apr 2015 #128
The few people H2O Man Apr 2015 #154
maybe others should be encouraging a group not to advocate not voting in pres election, or seabeyond Apr 2015 #37
I gather you believe that's something that someone who does not support Hillary should cali Apr 2015 #53
i think that whether a clinton supporter or simply a democratic supporter should call out those that seabeyond Apr 2015 #62
Yeah, what Cali said. InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #97
really? so you are willing to ignore dems trying to split the party, encourage people not to vote, seabeyond Apr 2015 #102
lol, you serious? I was referring to what Cali said in the post I replied to... InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #112
wouldnt using "fauxoutrage" be exactly what cali refers too? because there are specifics she ignores seabeyond Apr 2015 #115
It's way to early to use phrases like "split the party". Change has come Apr 2015 #236
What pisses me off BainsBane Apr 2015 #47
I have already stated that I tentatively support O'Malley cali Apr 2015 #69
IMO, haters is entirely appropriate BainsBane Apr 2015 #104
Imagine the "vitriol" in the general election! Cosmic Kitten Apr 2015 #114
mindless cheerleaders, fans, shills, fauxoutrage, puma and what other names for clinton supporters seabeyond Apr 2015 #126
I was calleda racist and misogynist PowerToThePeople Apr 2015 #127
Really??? Who called you a "racist" and a "misogynist?" Number23 Apr 2015 #199
You. PowerToThePeople Apr 2015 #200
Why, you're right!! Here's the post in question Number23 Apr 2015 #202
I'll let the readers browse that thread and come to their own conclusions. n/t PowerToThePeople Apr 2015 #205
As will I. As well as your knee jerk, hyper defensive responses in this thread by addition. Number23 Apr 2015 #208
maybe General Discussion should be re-named MSMDOE magical thyme Apr 2015 #20
I was talking about people who only discuss cons upaloopa Apr 2015 #76
Or in addition Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2015 #170
You hate America. H2O Man Apr 2015 #121
Then say hello to President Cruz. merrily Apr 2015 #275
Various candidates - when there are some treestar Apr 2015 #309
I think we should have a "promoting research into the science of human suspended animation" group. Warren DeMontague Apr 2015 #26
Not exactly. merrily Apr 2015 #276
Yeah, I'm used to some people on DU obsessively tracking things, making odd ad hominem attacks, etc Warren DeMontague Apr 2015 #281
I don't care if someone claims inevitability, as long as I am equally free to say merrily Apr 2015 #283
I get it. Warren DeMontague Apr 2015 #285
No double standards = fairness. merrily Apr 2015 #287
It's not Hillary it's you people that morph in to mindless cheerleaders and orpupilofnature57 Apr 2015 #29
morph into mindless cheerleaders. ya. that shit. nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #41
This is exactly where we need to argue about Hillary Clinton. paulbibeau Apr 2015 #35
OK, but only if I get to host it. NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #42
that group has already been mentioned several times above nt geek tragedy Apr 2015 #60
It's an awesome group filled with passionate members who want progress for all of us. nt NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #64
not the common theme I perceived geek tragedy Apr 2015 #72
no they do not. i have been told repeatedly, women gays black... back of the bus seabeyond Apr 2015 #74
Oh, that's going to require a little proof, my dear. I'm a host, nobody has alerted that to us. NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #81
in the top threads of that forum.... and i am far from the only one that read it. seabeyond Apr 2015 #83
Send me or another host a link to the questionable post and we'll look at it. NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #166
tomorrow i will put in the time... nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #174
Tomorrow is a promise to no one. pintobean Apr 2015 #182
wtf.... seabeyond Apr 2015 #185
That was your 100,000th post pintobean Apr 2015 #187
stop making death threats! merrily Apr 2015 #290
Ya think? merrily Apr 2015 #279
And we all have iPad Airs, part of the hosting contract. NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #82
I see a lot of bitterness there. joshcryer Apr 2015 #176
There are actually 2 already. one_voice Apr 2015 #46
I think we should have a mayonnaise group. NuclearDem Apr 2015 #48
Well then I think we should have... one_voice Apr 2015 #55
Fuck that pintobean Apr 2015 #58
Ketchup group! greatauntoftriplets Apr 2015 #59
Only PUMAs call it catsup. NuclearDem Apr 2015 #70
Now you've done it. CATSUP! NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #79
Kerry shill! merrily Apr 2015 #291
Draft Fry Sauce! nt LadyHawkAZ Apr 2015 #158
Sorry, fuck mayonaise.. and leave my mustard alone! Cha Apr 2015 #186
Way to freeze out the vegans, you right wing so and so. merrily Apr 2015 #288
There are countless websites devoted to the cause of defeating Clinton BainsBane Apr 2015 #54
mmmmm.. mmmmm... boston bean Apr 2015 #61
or that it is barbara bush mentality.... not mess up her beautiful mind syndome, garbage. nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #66
And there it is! n/t freshwest Apr 2015 #294
We need a "Hillary Worship Group" or "Hilary is Perfect" group you mean. Logical Apr 2015 #68
+ 1000 !!! Then the rest of us can ask freely, without being dubbed SP . n/t orpupilofnature57 Apr 2015 #110
I would join a group that, well, not a hate group but one that has some Cleita Apr 2015 #75
There is a DU group whose main purpose geek tragedy Apr 2015 #85
Some HRC fans are suggesting it is sexist to subject Hillary to a primary. AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #90
Really? hrmjustin Apr 2015 #140
You'll find varying degrees of that sentiment within these: AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #145
Well obviously I don't think it is sexist to have a primary. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #146
I would not have expected you to. AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #148
i believe there will be a primary and it is healthy to have one. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #149
there you go AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #151
lol. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #152
pfft AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #233
Have gone to both. I want a primary to clear up the distortions fed the left by the right. n/t freshwest Apr 2015 #305
I think they were saying the suggestion a primary was needed treestar Apr 2015 #144
links at post #145 AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #157
No, that a man would not have it so loudly demanded treestar Apr 2015 #295
No one is saying that. Agschmid Apr 2015 #224
Right, except for those that are. AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #232
Neither one of those OP's states that there should NOT be a primary. Agschmid Apr 2015 #237
the threads, read the threads AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #238
That's an unecessary insult towards me, I'll do some reading and get back to you. Agschmid Apr 2015 #239
could not possibly care less what you do AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #240
Seriously? Agschmid Apr 2015 #243
You summarily dismissed what I posted without bothering to read the links. AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #245
too late! spanone Apr 2015 #92
Looks like the circular firing squads have begun, so Pathwalker Apr 2015 #98
Patience. We probably won't be here much longer. SolutionisSolidarity Apr 2015 #108
...You speak truth, sadly. RiverLover Apr 2015 #172
The majority of the forum doesn't like Hillary LittleBlue Apr 2015 #111
It's the things she's done, and for who, that is a clue as to what she'll do. orpupilofnature57 Apr 2015 #113
Bernie Sanders is looking for you KMOD Apr 2015 #130
Thank you for pointing out there is a concerted effort to make Clinton supporters uncomfortable here DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #155
i am not a clinton supporter and i have not been made uncomfortable. nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #164
Definitely wasn't my intent LittleBlue Apr 2015 #241
There are times that I have been anything but nice but I appreciate your remarks... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #318
There are times that I have been anything but nice but I appreciate your remarks... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #318
Post removed Post removed Apr 2015 #119
Didn't know we were bothering you. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #133
We literally bother him by breathing./NT DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #156
I don't know the poster well but I wonder if it was meant in jest and the poster didn't write it hrmjustin Apr 2015 #162
Shills is a term that should not be used treestar Apr 2015 #139
Not my alert and I am surprised it was hidden. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #143
There already IS that group...they just don't have the guts to call themselves that! VanillaRhapsody Apr 2015 #120
They do at Red State Tommy2Tone Apr 2015 #123
I recommend liberal use of the trash thread and ignore functions. n/t winter is coming Apr 2015 #125
This message was self-deleted by its author hrmjustin Apr 2015 #129
LOL treestar Apr 2015 #134
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #142
Not needed. MerryBlooms Apr 2015 #150
There is a concerted effort to cow Clinton supporters and make them uncomfortable here. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #153
Interesting. H2O Man Apr 2015 #161
I appreciate your response... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #169
Thank you for H2O Man Apr 2015 #173
This PowerToThePeople Apr 2015 #210
I have never once told someone not to vote for Hillary. All I have ever done is say that I will not liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #167
I never tell folks how to vote because I am not presumptuous enough to think they will listen.... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #171
Ya know it might be that some of us yuiyoshida Apr 2015 #159
K. Major Hogwash Apr 2015 #266
I think we should. darkangel218 Apr 2015 #165
I have a better idea Spider Jerusalem Apr 2015 #177
Yes, that is right. Bonobo Apr 2015 #198
I said nothing about not criticizing upaloopa Apr 2015 #212
Like I said about people who are too thin-skinned (which you clearly are!) Spider Jerusalem Apr 2015 #215
oh, I must be one of the people you are talking about. No, I won't vote for her whether she liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #221
It depends on what the criticisms are KMOD Apr 2015 #222
Maybe we could also have an "Elizabeth Warren is not running group" cascadiance Apr 2015 #178
I'm thinking if we had an Elizabeth upaloopa Apr 2015 #211
That's all the groups, including rude comments in the "safe haven" Warren Group. merrily Apr 2015 #278
It's possible to like and admire Hillary Clinton and still... polichick Apr 2015 #179
That's legitimate concern or criticism and I don't think that's what the OP is getting at... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #194
I'm in. mmonk Apr 2015 #206
That's what the Ignore function is for, even Skinner admits to using it. It's patriotic! freshwest Apr 2015 #216
I don't like any Turd Way Pol because they are disastrously wrong on a lot of important issues. TheKentuckian Apr 2015 #220
We do ... and it's not hard to find ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #227
How about a I don't like TPP group? JEB Apr 2015 #228
just pick anywhere MFM008 Apr 2015 #246
Then you must have forgotten the primary of 2008 very quickly. merrily Apr 2015 #292
Maybe we should have a primary candidate who has a chance in the General Election. HR_Pufnstuf Apr 2015 #249
This is rather silly,imho sadoldgirl Apr 2015 #251
LMAO. Then, why do Hillary's supporters keep showing up in the Populist Group? merrily Apr 2015 #252
Funny thing is Andy823 Apr 2015 #339
Well, merrily Apr 2015 #344
You did say this Andy823 Apr 2015 #345
? The language you quoted says less than nothing about voting. merrily Apr 2015 #346
Either that or AgingAmerican Apr 2015 #277
That would be the group whose hosts have pinned the "ReadyForSomeoneElse.org" thread muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #293
Well, the cat's out of the bag now. n/t freshwest Apr 2015 #311
Yes but the question is Andy823 Apr 2015 #348
Hillary has been an announced candidate for about, what, a week? Warren DeMontague Apr 2015 #349
yeah... it'll be like a 'free speech zone' set up for protestors... ProdigalJunkMail Apr 2015 #306
Textbook propaganda for corporate America, in which elections have been deliberately perverted woo me with science Apr 2015 #312
as always you nail the hypocrisy Ichingcarpenter Apr 2015 #315
I think you got it. nm rhett o rick Apr 2015 #358
^*^ kentauros Apr 2015 #316
what I REALLY hate NM_Birder Apr 2015 #335
Blame Skinner! kentauros Apr 2015 #338
It's called free republic. NCTraveler Apr 2015 #320
There is one, NM_Birder Apr 2015 #334
Kicking...nt SidDithers Apr 2015 #347
Interesting that this thread was allowed to continue. It is clearly flamebait or "destructive meta". rhett o rick Apr 2015 #352
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe we should have a &q...»Reply #298