Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)

17. No.

Reply to Takket (Reply #16)

Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:11 PM

Apr 2015

Because there is no answer for the nuclear waste which needs to be babysat for at least 1,000 years.

Yet nuke supporters are more than happy to dump it on future generations?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Coal versus Nuclear [View all] RobertEarl Apr 2015 OP

Coal doesn't require 50,000 years to biodegrade like nuclear waste. Cleita Apr 2015 #1

Yep RobertEarl Apr 2015 #2

Also coal can be replaced with solar wind and other renewables so Cleita Apr 2015 #5

Nuclear power is awesome, but it's Fission, Fusion reactors will be ultimate greatness! snooper2 Apr 2015 #3

Centralia Pennsylvania... hunter Apr 2015 #4

Except this isn't a example of why coal power plants are bad. Lancero Apr 2015 #11

Um, why was the coal mined? hunter Apr 2015 #13

As I pointed out in my post, given the time period it was for the steel industry. Lancero Apr 2015 #18

Okay. hunter Apr 2015 #20

Here is one, Cheshire,Ohio was bougt out by AEP because of Power plant pollution mackdaddy Apr 2015 #15

Do you have any comprehension of the amount of radiation emitted... SidDithers Apr 2015 #6

No more than he has any scientific comprehension about anything. hobbit709 Apr 2015 #7

Link or slink RobertEarl Apr 2015 #10

We actually shouldn't do either. Cleita Apr 2015 #8

Don't be silly Sid... FBaggins Apr 2015 #14

... NuclearDem Apr 2015 #9

nuclear power isn't the problem, unsafe boiling water reactors based on 60's tech is the problem Amishman Apr 2015 #12

The cumulative negative effects on Earth of coal Takket Apr 2015 #16

No. RobertEarl Apr 2015 #17

Unlike the toxic waste from coal? hunter Apr 2015 #19

This is why RobertEarl Apr 2015 #21