Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The War Machine - I Just Asked Erik Prince To Stop Bribing Politicians (David Swanson) [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)10. AIPAC to UANI: Make Gary Samore Shut Up!
United Against a Nuclear Iran (UANI), the secretive neoconservative group, is apparently intent on distancing itself from the comments of its own president, Gary Samore, who has spoken favorably of the framework agreement reached with Iran.
Jim Lobe
LobeLog, last updated: April 14, 2015
I attended a lunch panel on Iran hosted by the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) with Eric Edelman, John Hannah, Ray Takeyh, and Jonathan Ruhe as the featured presenters. The conversation on the dais veered between quite hawkish and moderately hawkish, as one might expect from members of JINSAs Iran task force. As the lineal successor to the Bipartisan Policy Centers Iran task force, JINSAs team has been urging the Obama administration to, among other measures, supply Israel with the latest version of the bunker-busting Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) and the aircraft to deliver it so as to, if Netanyahu finds it desirable, obliterate the Islamic Republics nuclear facilities.
As usual with these meetings, however, some of the most interesting dialogue came on the sidelines.
During lunch, I happened to be sitting in front of Charles Perkins, AIPACs assistant director for policy and government affairs. I didnt hear the full conversation, but Perkins at one point engaged a staffer whose name I didnt catch from the pro-sanctions and highly mysterious group, United Against a Nuclear Iran (UANI). UANI, whose board includes a neoconservative whos who, has opposed various stages of diplomacy with Iran. But, as my colleague Eli Clifton has noted,[font color="blue"] the groups presidentnuclear expert and Obamas first-term non-proliferation czar Gary Samorehas defended the framework with Iran as probably the best that can be achieved at this stage of the game.[/font color]
It was evident at the JINSA event that Perkins, the AIPAC official, was not pleased by this development. He complained to the UANI staffer about Samores praise for the announced framework. In particular, he was upset about Samores signing, along with several dozen former senior national-security officials, of a statement published by The Iran Project last week in support of the agreement. Perkins appeared to be under the misapprehension that Samore was speaking out in UANIs name. But the groups staffer assured him that, despite his position as president, Samore only speaks in his personal capacity (although he also noted that he was sometimes identified as the executive director of Harvards Belfer Center).
[font color="red"]Indeed, he stressed that Mark Wallacea former George W. Bush ambassador and a businessman involved in mining ventures that would allegedly profit from war with Iranwas UANIs CEO and controlled the groups agenda. [/font color]It bears noting that when Samore has expressed skepticism about the P5+1 negotiations, UANI has issued press releases signed by both their top executives, as with these statements from September 2013, July 2014 and last November. Its also worth noting that UANI has not issued a similar leadership release since the frameworks announcement, only a statement highlighting the purported differences between the U.S. parameters, Irans response, and the Joint EU-Iran communiqué.
Though the conversation was brief, and I couldnt hear all of it, the gist recalled above was crystal clear. (I did not have my notebook to hand; hence the unfortunate absence of direct quotes here.) I dont want to overstate its importance, but its telling in a number of ways.[font color="red"] First, UANI, which built its reputation by placing prominent non-proliferation experts like Gary Samore in high positions, is now distancing itself from Samore because it doesnt agree with his expert analysis. Secondly, AIPAC is likewise worried that nuclear non-proliferation experts might actually consider the prospective deal with Iran a positive development or, in any event, the least bad achievable result under the circumstances. This, of course, is not the view of Amb. Wallace or any of the JINSA task force members who spoke yesterday.[/font color]
SOURCE w/links:
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/articles/display/aipac_to_uani_make_gary_samore_shut_up
Jim Lobe
LobeLog, last updated: April 14, 2015
I attended a lunch panel on Iran hosted by the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) with Eric Edelman, John Hannah, Ray Takeyh, and Jonathan Ruhe as the featured presenters. The conversation on the dais veered between quite hawkish and moderately hawkish, as one might expect from members of JINSAs Iran task force. As the lineal successor to the Bipartisan Policy Centers Iran task force, JINSAs team has been urging the Obama administration to, among other measures, supply Israel with the latest version of the bunker-busting Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) and the aircraft to deliver it so as to, if Netanyahu finds it desirable, obliterate the Islamic Republics nuclear facilities.
As usual with these meetings, however, some of the most interesting dialogue came on the sidelines.
During lunch, I happened to be sitting in front of Charles Perkins, AIPACs assistant director for policy and government affairs. I didnt hear the full conversation, but Perkins at one point engaged a staffer whose name I didnt catch from the pro-sanctions and highly mysterious group, United Against a Nuclear Iran (UANI). UANI, whose board includes a neoconservative whos who, has opposed various stages of diplomacy with Iran. But, as my colleague Eli Clifton has noted,[font color="blue"] the groups presidentnuclear expert and Obamas first-term non-proliferation czar Gary Samorehas defended the framework with Iran as probably the best that can be achieved at this stage of the game.[/font color]
It was evident at the JINSA event that Perkins, the AIPAC official, was not pleased by this development. He complained to the UANI staffer about Samores praise for the announced framework. In particular, he was upset about Samores signing, along with several dozen former senior national-security officials, of a statement published by The Iran Project last week in support of the agreement. Perkins appeared to be under the misapprehension that Samore was speaking out in UANIs name. But the groups staffer assured him that, despite his position as president, Samore only speaks in his personal capacity (although he also noted that he was sometimes identified as the executive director of Harvards Belfer Center).
[font color="red"]Indeed, he stressed that Mark Wallacea former George W. Bush ambassador and a businessman involved in mining ventures that would allegedly profit from war with Iranwas UANIs CEO and controlled the groups agenda. [/font color]It bears noting that when Samore has expressed skepticism about the P5+1 negotiations, UANI has issued press releases signed by both their top executives, as with these statements from September 2013, July 2014 and last November. Its also worth noting that UANI has not issued a similar leadership release since the frameworks announcement, only a statement highlighting the purported differences between the U.S. parameters, Irans response, and the Joint EU-Iran communiqué.
Though the conversation was brief, and I couldnt hear all of it, the gist recalled above was crystal clear. (I did not have my notebook to hand; hence the unfortunate absence of direct quotes here.) I dont want to overstate its importance, but its telling in a number of ways.[font color="red"] First, UANI, which built its reputation by placing prominent non-proliferation experts like Gary Samore in high positions, is now distancing itself from Samore because it doesnt agree with his expert analysis. Secondly, AIPAC is likewise worried that nuclear non-proliferation experts might actually consider the prospective deal with Iran a positive development or, in any event, the least bad achievable result under the circumstances. This, of course, is not the view of Amb. Wallace or any of the JINSA task force members who spoke yesterday.[/font color]
SOURCE w/links:
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/articles/display/aipac_to_uani_make_gary_samore_shut_up
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The War Machine - I Just Asked Erik Prince To Stop Bribing Politicians (David Swanson) [View all]
Octafish
Apr 2015
OP
Like 'Twilight Zone' where the car's broke, monsters are coming, and the sheriff is an alien.
Octafish
Apr 2015
#6
The time will come when being on the side of the Henry Wallace's of the world will be
Dont call me Shirley
Apr 2015
#12
Congratulations, johnnyreb. University of Virginia is a global cultural treasure.
Octafish
Apr 2015
#13