Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
2. That's what I get from this as well..
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 09:58 AM
Apr 2015

No wonder they openly diss us, they know that we don't have a say and soon it will be a legality. Tiny homes for everyone! The future is looking very grim.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That first one is absolutely aimed at replacing governments as the controlling factor of world power Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #1
That's what I get from this as well.. haikugal Apr 2015 #2
We need strange bedfellows QuestionAlways Apr 2015 #36
The favoring local business clause will help create US jobs. The US doesn't have protectionist okaawhatever Apr 2015 #3
... ND-Dem Apr 2015 #14
What makes you think that the corporations do not intend to use "do not buy local clause" for the jwirr Apr 2015 #18
There isn't a "do not buy local clause" someone has given you bad information. It has a "you okaawhatever Apr 2015 #47
The US does very little "trade" fasttense Apr 2015 #20
That's what they told us about NAFTA. Overseas Apr 2015 #44
BTW the headline is a total lie. You should be ashamed. The TPP in no way makes it illegal to buy okaawhatever Apr 2015 #4
it makes it illegal to favor local buying by law ND-Dem Apr 2015 #15
That is not what the headline says. The headline is a lie. And yes, that is one of the great okaawhatever Apr 2015 #31
But this agreement does not include China or India QuestionAlways Apr 2015 #37
True, but there are protectionist measures for TPP signing countries. Hopeflly doing business okaawhatever Apr 2015 #45
What are the protectionist measures for TPP signing countries. QuestionAlways Apr 2015 #49
Here is one example: okaawhatever Apr 2015 #55
No big deal it is just the Wal-marting of the Pacific. A nation can not LiberalArkie Apr 2015 #21
Sorry, this is the kind of absolute hysterical, dishonest crap that makes us opponents cali Apr 2015 #5
^^^this. mopinko Apr 2015 #9
... ND-Dem Apr 2015 #16
So Cali how do you interpret the clause: fasttense Apr 2015 #22
It makes it illegal for the government to favor local businesses. jeff47 Apr 2015 #28
And that is good ?? QuestionAlways Apr 2015 #38
So, is it good to ENCOURAGE using MORE fossil fuels to ship products "not local" around the world... cascadiance Apr 2015 #50
You did not notice the sarcasm in my question, I agree with you QuestionAlways Apr 2015 #57
My apologies... It's hard to sort out some of the rhetoric here at times... cascadiance Apr 2015 #59
No problem, and I hope this week goes better for you QuestionAlways Apr 2015 #60
Usually. jeff47 Apr 2015 #58
Is what good? Chan790 Apr 2015 #62
Corporations have taken official control of Congress and White House, now they want judicial branch whereisjustice Apr 2015 #6
It's a corporate coup d'états. Dont call me Shirley Apr 2015 #7
K&R! Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #8
Shameful distortions and fear mongering appears to be the go to arguments against the TPP. Fred Sanders Apr 2015 #10
So Fred how do you interpret the clause: fasttense Apr 2015 #23
"International companies and domestic companies will be subject equally to the laws of the nation they do business in." Duh. Fred Sanders Apr 2015 #26
So let's say there's a law that says government should favor local, small businesses. jeff47 Apr 2015 #29
So, encouraging local buying such as the "Pick Tenn" state funded promotion fasttense Apr 2015 #30
Promotion isn't unequal treatment and the TPP doesn't have any provision that stops promoting okaawhatever Apr 2015 #32
Why is promotion not considered "treatment" or "conduct"? fasttense Apr 2015 #48
China is not part o this agreement QuestionAlways Apr 2015 #41
This is a death knell to any poorer country. It will keep them from developing their own economy. jwirr Apr 2015 #11
B.S. This is preventing exactly what you said England did. Countries can't export okaawhatever Apr 2015 #33
actually local is an answer to climate change PowerToThePeople Apr 2015 #39
In the next two years the Rs are in control in the government. Any progress we make in climate jwirr Apr 2015 #43
K&R whereisjustice Apr 2015 #12
No TPP! Enthusiast Apr 2015 #13
Here is little 'ol me trying to understand - pro-con of TPP asiliveandbreathe Apr 2015 #17
this one is the one with quick power to destroy: ND-Dem Apr 2015 #19
B.S. It does not do what you claim. It doesn't set the rules for what speculation is allowed, okaawhatever Apr 2015 #35
As a TPP apologist, your credibility to tell people water is not wet... Chan790 Apr 2015 #63
I think it is time to start constructing guillotines. n/t PowerToThePeople Apr 2015 #24
“the expectation of gain or profit.”. . Well, HELL annabanana Apr 2015 #25
The phrase "Free Market" seems to just include one side of the equation.. annabanana Apr 2015 #27
STOP THE GOD DAMN TPP! Maineman Apr 2015 #34
K & R AzDar Apr 2015 #40
K&R. This provision also hurts our environment. Overseas Apr 2015 #42
Shipping labor and products around the world hastens the human race's extinction with climate change cascadiance Apr 2015 #52
Exactly. We actually need to return to more local production. Overseas Apr 2015 #56
TPP is designed to do one thing and one thing only. hifiguy Apr 2015 #46
Actually, the TPP will make it illegal to SPECIFY buying local. djean111 Apr 2015 #51
And probably Josephine and Jackson county's laws against GMO crops in Oregon will be overturned... cascadiance Apr 2015 #53
Yup. That's the plan. djean111 Apr 2015 #54
bingo! liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Korten: A Trade Rule That...»Reply #2