Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If elected President, which of these Democrats... [View all]MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)125. Good point.
How LBJ Saved the Civil Rights Act
Days after Kennedys murder, Johnson displayed the type of leadership on civil rights that his predecessor lacked and that the other branches could not possibly match. He made the bold and exceedingly risky decision to champion the stalled civil-rights bill. It was a pivotal moment: without Johnson, a strong bill would not have passed. Caro writes that during a searching late-night conversation that lasted into the morning of November 27, when somebody tried to persuade Johnson not to waste his time or capital on the lost cause of civil rights, the president replied, Well, what the hells the presidency for? He grasped the unique possibilities of the moment and saw how to leverage the nations grief by tying Kennedys legacy to the fight against inequality. Addressing Congress later that day, Johnson showed that he would replace his predecessors eloquence with concrete action. He resolutely announced: We have talked long enough in this country about equal rights. We have talked for 100 years or more. It is time now to write the next chapter, and to write it in the books of law.
...
Lyndon Johnsons, of course, do not come along every four or every 40 years. Even if they did, Johnson brought plenty of darkness (election stealing, a credibility gap, Vietnam) along with the light (Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, Great Society). Moreover, not every president needs to be a legislative genius in order to pass laws. Obama, after all, gambled big on the Affordable Care Act, investing the same type of capital in health care that Johnson invested in civil rights. It is now the law of the land. But the energy and purpose that Johnson brought to the Civil Rights Act struggle remains inspiring, and is a model for all presidents. As Richard Russell, the Souths leader in the Senate during the 1960s, put it to a friend a few days after Kennedys assassination: You know, we could have beaten John Kennedy on civil rights, but not Lyndon Johnson.
Days after Kennedys murder, Johnson displayed the type of leadership on civil rights that his predecessor lacked and that the other branches could not possibly match. He made the bold and exceedingly risky decision to champion the stalled civil-rights bill. It was a pivotal moment: without Johnson, a strong bill would not have passed. Caro writes that during a searching late-night conversation that lasted into the morning of November 27, when somebody tried to persuade Johnson not to waste his time or capital on the lost cause of civil rights, the president replied, Well, what the hells the presidency for? He grasped the unique possibilities of the moment and saw how to leverage the nations grief by tying Kennedys legacy to the fight against inequality. Addressing Congress later that day, Johnson showed that he would replace his predecessors eloquence with concrete action. He resolutely announced: We have talked long enough in this country about equal rights. We have talked for 100 years or more. It is time now to write the next chapter, and to write it in the books of law.
...
Lyndon Johnsons, of course, do not come along every four or every 40 years. Even if they did, Johnson brought plenty of darkness (election stealing, a credibility gap, Vietnam) along with the light (Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, Great Society). Moreover, not every president needs to be a legislative genius in order to pass laws. Obama, after all, gambled big on the Affordable Care Act, investing the same type of capital in health care that Johnson invested in civil rights. It is now the law of the land. But the energy and purpose that Johnson brought to the Civil Rights Act struggle remains inspiring, and is a model for all presidents. As Richard Russell, the Souths leader in the Senate during the 1960s, put it to a friend a few days after Kennedys assassination: You know, we could have beaten John Kennedy on civil rights, but not Lyndon Johnson.
There was also this FDR guy... whatever...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
162 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary because I think she has the best chance to bring the house and senate to the Democrats.
hrmjustin
Apr 2015
#1
But focusing on him to blame makes it harder to fix the system properly...
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#131
I am sorry but he had the right to run but his running helped cause Bush and he deserves to be
hrmjustin
Apr 2015
#132
I have no problem with third parties but they are not immune from criticism.
hrmjustin
Apr 2015
#134
But criticize their policies, not that simply running helps the Republicans...
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#136
No. He should not be blamed as he was the only determining factor that was democracy in action.
cui bono
Apr 2015
#149
Yes, taking all that GOP money for his campaign was "true democracy in action....?"
MADem
Apr 2015
#151
There's nothing in our system STOPPING him from being a Democrat to do so...
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#126
I think that many here underestimate the capability of either Sanders or Warren winning...
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#135
He ran on "ending welfare as we know it"-not on throwing poor people to the wolves.
Ken Burch
Apr 2015
#67
He could at least have shown the stones Harry Truman showed when he vetoed Taft-Hartley.
Ken Burch
Apr 2015
#72
+1000 Third Way politicians seek divided government, not majorities.
woo me with science
Apr 2015
#79
I want to pick Liz who isn't running or Bernie but I'm ignoring Manny so I can't vote in the poll.
Autumn
Apr 2015
#5
No...but I would be interested in a "Ignore the Ignore MannyGoldstein group". n/t.
Ken Burch
Apr 2015
#141
It's not up and running yet but in the meantime you can still join us in the Elizabeth Warren
Autumn
Apr 2015
#142
No one is restricted from voting. You can chose Other if you like no one listed in the poll
Autumn
Apr 2015
#156
The time has run out on the poll that's why the options to vote are un-clickable.
Autumn
Apr 2015
#158
It took me a bit to find it. I looked twice for your name to see if you had voted
Autumn
Apr 2015
#160
AFL-CIO Day of Action to Stop Fast Track- Today, April 18 2015.....Do something about it!!!!
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#90
This is a big Day of Action on Fast Track, there are events all over the country today.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#91
You're right. Kissinger is only an accessory to murder. But, there's no statute of limitations
leveymg
Apr 2015
#115
I'm of the opinion that anyone these days who would make a great POTUS for the 99% ...
Fumesucker
Apr 2015
#18
Or the desire for a dictator who will be obedient to their own purist demands
YoungDemCA
Apr 2015
#123
Bernie fights for Democratic principles better than most card-carrying Dems...
polichick
Apr 2015
#80
If your 1% allies, the MSM, would have allowed Kucinich some press, maybe he would have.
Zorra
Apr 2015
#117
As I've noted in my thread, Hillary isn't interested in changing trade or campain finances
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2015
#118
In case you haven't noticed, both houses of Congress are controlled by the GOP
YoungDemCA
Apr 2015
#121