General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama Levels Cheap Shot At Unions - Again [View all]PosterChild
(1,307 posts)...in context
And being opposed to this new trade agreement is essentially a ratification of the status quo, where a lot of folks are selling here, but were not selling there. Japan is one of the negotiators in this deal. Now, the last time I checked, if you drive around Washington, there are a whole bunch of Japanese cars. You go to Tokyo and count how many Chryslers and GM and Ford cars there are. So the current situation is not working for us. And I dont know why it is that folks would be opposed to us opening up the Japanese market more for U.S. autos, or U.S. beef. It doesnt make any sense.
So Im going to be able to make a strong case. But I think its important when you talk about dividing the party -- look, we got a Korean free trade agreement passed, we got a Colombia free trade agreement passed, and a Panama free trade agreement passed over the last several years, during my presidency. It didnt divide the Democratic Party. Theres going to be a set of Democratic senators and House members who traditionally have just, on principle, opposed trade because the unions, on principle, regardless of what the provisions are, are opposed to trade.
And then there are others who, like me, believe that we cannot stop a global economy at our shores. Weve got to be in there and compete. And weve got to make sure were writing the rules so that we got a level playing field -- because when we do, products made in America and services provided by American firms are the best in the world. And I will continue to make that argument.
https://whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/04/17/remarks-president-obama-and-prime-minister-renzi-italy-joint-press-confe