Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

cali

(114,904 posts)

9. you've got that wrong.

Reply to NYC_SKP (Reply #6)

Sun May 6, 2012, 10:24 PM

May 2012

you're confusing what VY produced with what Vermont consumed. NOT one and the same. It provided 35% of the power used in the state in 2008 and that's way down today. None of the power companies in Vermont are purchasing power from VT Yankee.

Neither GMP or CVP is buying power from VY

The federal decision to allow Vermont Yankee to stay open is not impacting Green Mountain Power's immediate plans for energy.

GMP's contract with the state's only nuclear power plant expires in March. Yankee has provided power to Green Mountain Power for the last 40 years, but the two groups failed to reach a new agreement last year, in part due to uncertainty involving Yankee's future.
http://www.wcax.com/story/16567489/vt-yankee-ruling-wont-impact-gmp

From Wiki:
It provided 71.8% of all electricity generated in Vermont in 2008, which is 35% of the overall electricity used in the state.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Could Industrial Wind Ruin Vermont? [View all] cali May 2012 OP

I'm sorry. The choice is visible healthy power or hidden nasty power. NYC_SKP May 2012 #1

I don't think you understand cali May 2012 #2

For the equivalent amount of power generation for these particular residents, what would you prefer? NYC_SKP May 2012 #3

Yes, I do prefer hydro cali May 2012 #4

I'm not sure solar is a good choice for northern Vermont.. Fumesucker May 2012 #5

well, here's bernie talking about geothermal in Vermont cali May 2012 #8

It's terrific, it reduces use of fuel oil and gas and electricity, but it won't run the lights... NYC_SKP May 2012 #10

Hydro Quebec is a done deal. cali May 2012 #13

Nope, Vermont is 42. California is the lowest PER CAPITA user of electricity. NYC_SKP May 2012 #14

Ground source heat pumps are not the same thing as geothermal energy production.. Fumesucker May 2012 #12

Checking on this, I see Vermont was 71% Nuclear in 2005 for electricity. Wow! NYC_SKP May 2012 #6

The Vermont Yankee nuclear plant, which Vermont wants to close FarCenter May 2012 #7

We really will freeze if industrial wind ruins the Kingdom cali May 2012 #11

Tourism won't last FarCenter May 2012 #18

you've got that wrong. cali May 2012 #9

35% is still a big piece of the pie, more by far than the national piece of pie... NYC_SKP May 2012 #15

uh, did you miss the part where I said that cali May 2012 #17

South of Lahaina, far from Hana. NYC_SKP May 2012 #19

I think what is lost here is that any form of energy production results in something undesirable johnd83 May 2012 #16

Scale matters FarCenter May 2012 #20

The wind turbines can't possibly do as much damage as leaking gas tanks JDPriestly May 2012 #21

Coupla things about the Kingdom, and bad people Mopar151 May 2012 #22

I actually wouldn't object to East Mountain being used as a cali May 2012 #24

I did. Mopar151 May 2012 #26

Oh Noes! MadHound May 2012 #23

You have NO idea what you're spewing about. None. cali May 2012 #25

I think the towers are graceful in appearance. Throd May 2012 #27