Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Larry Summers and the Secret "End-Game" Memo (collapse of the world economy) [View all]
I have discovered that many people are still not aware of this immeasurably important document and what happened because of it. Even though this article by Mr. Greg Palast was written back on August 22, 2013, it is just as important today as it was then. Maybe even more so.
Posted in full with permission from Greg Palast.
When a little birdie dropped the End Game memo through my window, its content was so explosive, so sick and plain evil, I just couldn't believe it.
The Memo confirmed every conspiracy freak's fantasy: that in the late 1990s, the top US Treasury officials secretly conspired with a small cabal of banker big-shots to rip apart financial regulation across the planet. When you see 26.3%unemployment in Spain, desperation and hunger in Greece, riots in Indonesia and Detroit in bankruptcy, go back to this End Game memo, the genesis of the blood and tears.
The Treasury official playing the bankers' secret End Game was Larry Summers. Today, Summers is Barack Obama's leading choice for Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, the world's central bank. If the confidential memo* is authentic, then Summers shouldn't be serving on the Fed, he should be serving hard time in some dungeon reserved for the criminally insane of the finance world.
The memo is authentic.
To get that confirmation, I would have to fly to Geneva and wangle a meeting with the Secretary General of the World Trade Organization, Pascal Lamy. I did. Lamy, the Generalissimo of Globalization, told me,
"The WTO was not created as some dark cabal of multinationals secretly cooking plots against the people . We don't have cigar-smoking, rich, crazy bankers negotiating."
Then I showed him the memo.
It begins with Summers flunky, Timothy Geithner, reminding his boss to call the then most powerful CEOs on the planet and get them to order their lobbyist armies to march:
"As we enter the end-game of the WTO financial services negotiations, I believe it would be a good idea for you to touch base with the CEOs ."
To avoid Summers having to call his office to get the phone numbers (which, under US law, would have to appear on public logs), Geithner listed their private lines. And here they are:
Goldman Sachs: John Corzine (212)902-8281
Merrill Lynch: David Kamanski (212)449-6868
Bank of America, David Coulter (415)622-2255
Citibank: John Reed (212)559-2732
Chase Manhattan: Walter Shipley (212)270-1380
Lamy was right: They don't smoke cigars. Go ahead and dial them. I did, and sure enough, got a cheery personal hello from Reedcheery until I revealed I wasn't Larry Summers. (Note: The other numbers were swiftly disconnected. And Corzine can't be reached while he faces criminal charges.)
It's not the little cabal of confabs held by Summers and the banksters that's so troubling. The horror is in the purpose of the "end game" itself.
Let me explain:
The year was 1997. US Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin was pushing hard to de-regulate banks. That required, first, repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act to dismantle the barrier between commercial banks and investment banks. It was like replacing bank vaults with roulette wheels.
Second, the banks wanted the right to play a new high-risk game: "derivatives trading." JP Morgan alone would soon carry $88 trillion* of these pseudo-securities on its books as "assets."
Deputy Treasury Secretary Summers (soon to replace Rubin as Secretary) body-blocked any attempt to control derivatives.
But what was the use of turning US banks into derivatives casinos if money would flee to nations with safer banking laws?
The answer conceived by the Big Bank Five: eliminate controls on banks in every nation on the planet in one single move. It was as brilliant as it was insanely dangerous.
How could they pull off this mad caper? The bankers' and Summers' game was to use the Financial Services Agreement, an abstruse and benign addendum to the international trade agreements policed by the World Trade Organization.
Until the bankers began their play, the WTO agreements dealt simply with trade in goodsthat is, my cars for your bananas. The new rules ginned-up by Summers and the banks would force all nations to accept trade in "bads" toxic assets like financial derivatives.
Until the bankers' re-draft of the FSA, each nation controlled and chartered the banks within their own borders. The new rules of the game would force every nation to open their markets to Citibank, JP Morgan and their derivatives "products."
And all 156 nations in the WTO would have to smash down their own Glass-Steagall divisions between commercial savings banks and the investment banks that gamble with derivatives.
The job of turning the FSA into the bankers' battering ram was given to Geithner, who was named Ambassador to the World Trade Organization.
Bankers Go Bananas
Why in the world would any nation agree to let its banking system be boarded and seized by financial pirates like JP Morgan?
The answer, in the case of Ecuador, was bananas. Ecuador was truly a banana republic. The yellow fruit was that nation's life-and-death source of hard currency. If it refused to sign the new FSA, Ecuador could feed its bananas to the monkeys and go back into bankruptcy. Ecuador signed.
And so onwith every single nation bullied into signing.
Every nation but one, I should say. Brazil's new President, Inacio Lula da Silva, refused. In retaliation, Brazil was threatened with a virtual embargo of its products by the European Union's Trade Commissioner, one Peter Mandelson, according to another confidential memo* I got my hands on. But Lula's refusenik stance paid off for Brazil which, alone among Western nations, survived and thrived during the 2007-9 bank crisis.
China signedbut got its pound of flesh in return. It opened its banking sector a crack in return for access and control of the US auto parts and other markets. (Swiftly, two million US jobs shifted to China.)
The new FSA pulled the lid off the Pandora's box of worldwide derivatives trade. Among the notorious transactions legalized: Goldman Sachs (where Treasury Secretary Rubin had been Co-Chairman) worked a secret euro-derivatives swap with Greece which, ultimately, destroyed that nation. Ecuador, its own banking sector de-regulated and demolished, exploded into riots. Argentina had to sell off its oil companies (to the Spanish) and water systems (to Enron) while its teachers hunted for food in garbage cans. Then, Bankers Gone Wild in the Eurozone dove head-first into derivatives pools without knowing how to swimand the continent is now being sold off in tiny, cheap pieces to Germany.
Of course, it was not just threats that sold the FSA, but temptation as well. After all, every evil starts with one bite of an apple offered by a snake. The apple: The gleaming piles of lucre hidden in the FSA for local elites. The snake was named Larry.
Does all this evil and pain flow from a single memo? Of course not: the evil was The Game itself, as played by the banker clique. The memo only revealed their game-plan for checkmate.
And the memo reveals a lot about Summers and Obama.
While billions of sorry souls are still hurting from worldwide banker-made disaster, Rubin and Summers didn't do too badly. Rubin's deregulation of banks had permitted the creation of a financial monstrosity called "Citigroup." Within weeks of leaving office, Rubin was named director, then Chairman of Citigroupwhich went bankrupt while managing to pay Rubin a total of $126 million.*
Then Rubin took on another post: as key campaign benefactor to a young State Senator, Barack Obama. Only days after his election as President, Obama, at Rubin's insistence, gave Summers the odd post of US "Economics Tsar" and made Geithner his Tsarina (that is, Secretary of Treasury). In 2010, Summers gave up his royalist robes to return to "consulting" for Citibank and other creatures of bank deregulation whose payments have raised Summers' net worth by $31 million* since the "end-game" memo.
That Obama would, at Robert Rubin's demand, now choose Summers to run the Federal Reserve Board means that, unfortunately, we are far from the end of the game.
* * * * * * * *
The Memo confirmed every conspiracy freak's fantasy: that in the late 1990s, the top US Treasury officials secretly conspired with a small cabal of banker big-shots to rip apart financial regulation across the planet. When you see 26.3%unemployment in Spain, desperation and hunger in Greece, riots in Indonesia and Detroit in bankruptcy, go back to this End Game memo, the genesis of the blood and tears.
The Treasury official playing the bankers' secret End Game was Larry Summers. Today, Summers is Barack Obama's leading choice for Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, the world's central bank. If the confidential memo* is authentic, then Summers shouldn't be serving on the Fed, he should be serving hard time in some dungeon reserved for the criminally insane of the finance world.
The memo is authentic.
To get that confirmation, I would have to fly to Geneva and wangle a meeting with the Secretary General of the World Trade Organization, Pascal Lamy. I did. Lamy, the Generalissimo of Globalization, told me,
"The WTO was not created as some dark cabal of multinationals secretly cooking plots against the people . We don't have cigar-smoking, rich, crazy bankers negotiating."
Then I showed him the memo.
It begins with Summers flunky, Timothy Geithner, reminding his boss to call the then most powerful CEOs on the planet and get them to order their lobbyist armies to march:
"As we enter the end-game of the WTO financial services negotiations, I believe it would be a good idea for you to touch base with the CEOs ."
To avoid Summers having to call his office to get the phone numbers (which, under US law, would have to appear on public logs), Geithner listed their private lines. And here they are:
Goldman Sachs: John Corzine (212)902-8281
Merrill Lynch: David Kamanski (212)449-6868
Bank of America, David Coulter (415)622-2255
Citibank: John Reed (212)559-2732
Chase Manhattan: Walter Shipley (212)270-1380
Lamy was right: They don't smoke cigars. Go ahead and dial them. I did, and sure enough, got a cheery personal hello from Reedcheery until I revealed I wasn't Larry Summers. (Note: The other numbers were swiftly disconnected. And Corzine can't be reached while he faces criminal charges.)
It's not the little cabal of confabs held by Summers and the banksters that's so troubling. The horror is in the purpose of the "end game" itself.
Let me explain:
The year was 1997. US Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin was pushing hard to de-regulate banks. That required, first, repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act to dismantle the barrier between commercial banks and investment banks. It was like replacing bank vaults with roulette wheels.
Second, the banks wanted the right to play a new high-risk game: "derivatives trading." JP Morgan alone would soon carry $88 trillion* of these pseudo-securities on its books as "assets."
Deputy Treasury Secretary Summers (soon to replace Rubin as Secretary) body-blocked any attempt to control derivatives.
But what was the use of turning US banks into derivatives casinos if money would flee to nations with safer banking laws?
The answer conceived by the Big Bank Five: eliminate controls on banks in every nation on the planet in one single move. It was as brilliant as it was insanely dangerous.
How could they pull off this mad caper? The bankers' and Summers' game was to use the Financial Services Agreement, an abstruse and benign addendum to the international trade agreements policed by the World Trade Organization.
Until the bankers began their play, the WTO agreements dealt simply with trade in goodsthat is, my cars for your bananas. The new rules ginned-up by Summers and the banks would force all nations to accept trade in "bads" toxic assets like financial derivatives.
Until the bankers' re-draft of the FSA, each nation controlled and chartered the banks within their own borders. The new rules of the game would force every nation to open their markets to Citibank, JP Morgan and their derivatives "products."
And all 156 nations in the WTO would have to smash down their own Glass-Steagall divisions between commercial savings banks and the investment banks that gamble with derivatives.
The job of turning the FSA into the bankers' battering ram was given to Geithner, who was named Ambassador to the World Trade Organization.
Bankers Go Bananas
Why in the world would any nation agree to let its banking system be boarded and seized by financial pirates like JP Morgan?
The answer, in the case of Ecuador, was bananas. Ecuador was truly a banana republic. The yellow fruit was that nation's life-and-death source of hard currency. If it refused to sign the new FSA, Ecuador could feed its bananas to the monkeys and go back into bankruptcy. Ecuador signed.
And so onwith every single nation bullied into signing.
Every nation but one, I should say. Brazil's new President, Inacio Lula da Silva, refused. In retaliation, Brazil was threatened with a virtual embargo of its products by the European Union's Trade Commissioner, one Peter Mandelson, according to another confidential memo* I got my hands on. But Lula's refusenik stance paid off for Brazil which, alone among Western nations, survived and thrived during the 2007-9 bank crisis.
China signedbut got its pound of flesh in return. It opened its banking sector a crack in return for access and control of the US auto parts and other markets. (Swiftly, two million US jobs shifted to China.)
The new FSA pulled the lid off the Pandora's box of worldwide derivatives trade. Among the notorious transactions legalized: Goldman Sachs (where Treasury Secretary Rubin had been Co-Chairman) worked a secret euro-derivatives swap with Greece which, ultimately, destroyed that nation. Ecuador, its own banking sector de-regulated and demolished, exploded into riots. Argentina had to sell off its oil companies (to the Spanish) and water systems (to Enron) while its teachers hunted for food in garbage cans. Then, Bankers Gone Wild in the Eurozone dove head-first into derivatives pools without knowing how to swimand the continent is now being sold off in tiny, cheap pieces to Germany.
Of course, it was not just threats that sold the FSA, but temptation as well. After all, every evil starts with one bite of an apple offered by a snake. The apple: The gleaming piles of lucre hidden in the FSA for local elites. The snake was named Larry.
Does all this evil and pain flow from a single memo? Of course not: the evil was The Game itself, as played by the banker clique. The memo only revealed their game-plan for checkmate.
And the memo reveals a lot about Summers and Obama.
While billions of sorry souls are still hurting from worldwide banker-made disaster, Rubin and Summers didn't do too badly. Rubin's deregulation of banks had permitted the creation of a financial monstrosity called "Citigroup." Within weeks of leaving office, Rubin was named director, then Chairman of Citigroupwhich went bankrupt while managing to pay Rubin a total of $126 million.*
Then Rubin took on another post: as key campaign benefactor to a young State Senator, Barack Obama. Only days after his election as President, Obama, at Rubin's insistence, gave Summers the odd post of US "Economics Tsar" and made Geithner his Tsarina (that is, Secretary of Treasury). In 2010, Summers gave up his royalist robes to return to "consulting" for Citibank and other creatures of bank deregulation whose payments have raised Summers' net worth by $31 million* since the "end-game" memo.
That Obama would, at Robert Rubin's demand, now choose Summers to run the Federal Reserve Board means that, unfortunately, we are far from the end of the game.
* * * * * * * *
There are many reasons this is still as important as it was when it happened.
Take, for example, the threat from Larry Summers to Elizabeth Warren in 2009:
After dinner, Larry leaned back in his chair and offered me some advice, Ms. Warren writes. I had a choice. I could be an insider or I could be an outsider. Outsiders can say whatever they want. But people on the inside dont listen to them. Insiders, however, get lots of access and a chance to push their ideas. People powerful people listen to what they have to say. But insiders also understand one unbreakable rule: They dont criticize other insiders.
https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2014/04/29/stunning-quote-larry-summers-to-elizabeth-warren-in-2009-insiders-dont-criticize-other-insiders/
And more importantly, Larry Summers is a main adviser to Clinton on economic strategy.
*There are links in the article by Greg Palast that download documents. I don't know how to create those links here. If you are interested in them, please visit his website.
Original Palast article:
http://www.gregpalast.com/larry-summers-and-the-secret-end-game-memo/
250 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Larry Summers and the Secret "End-Game" Memo (collapse of the world economy) [View all]
marym625
Apr 2015
OP
I remember when this first came out. Greg Palast is one hell of a investigative journalist.
Autumn
Apr 2015
#1
I wouldn't defend Larry Summers if someone held a gun to my head. There are those
Autumn
Apr 2015
#137
Well you can tell who read the article and who did not, it doesn't even mention HRC.
Rex
Apr 2015
#140
Yep, the article was about Summers and not HRC. Right, they would sell their own Mothers
Autumn
Apr 2015
#145
Would it please them if we list all the major contacts Summers has had over his career?
Rex
Apr 2015
#199
No you misread that, not mad at all. Just pointing out that Summers hands are all over the place
Rex
Apr 2015
#204
How should we know who exactly she is listening to the most? If this document is true and I see
jwirr
Apr 2015
#41
Why would she choose someone like Larry Summers, aside from THIS, which if Palast knows
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#146
Brooksley Born was right, she was a brilliant woman. Greenspan was so disastrously wrong, along with
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#155
If I were running, as Hillary is, I would seek out Brooksley Born and others who were RIGHT
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#162
You're welcome Mary. That documentary was excellent and should be required viewing by
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#207
You will find it gripping, I think. I am going to watch it again but like you, not tonight.
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#212
Some people have an agenda to keep ingestigative reporting dead. They love these dumbass pundits
Rex
Apr 2015
#132
YEP. Always look for the people the M$M mocks and ridicules. They have a reason to be upset.
Rex
Apr 2015
#142
Ok, tell me what the bankers had to gain by the collapse of the world economy
QuestionAlways
Apr 2015
#98
We're not talking about the "employees" of the banks. We're talking about the wheelers
cui bono
Apr 2015
#121
Ask Joseph Stiglitz about Larry Summers asking: 'What would Goldman think of that? '
Octafish
Apr 2015
#172
Banks having the chance to make more money is "the whole ideal of capitalism"?
Art_from_Ark
Apr 2015
#224
A socially conscious conservative does not exist in today's Republican party.
QuestionAlways
Apr 2015
#120
it would be nice to get past personalities and focus on policy that matters
nashville_brook
Apr 2015
#22
And especially if they are allowed another generation to continue their games. However, since both
jwirr
Apr 2015
#49
Thank you. I am an avid Sanders supporter and I was thinking that we do have some good
jwirr
Apr 2015
#54
Center for American Progess is the think tank Podesta founded, no? He's on her team, too.
merrily
Apr 2015
#65
"Mr. Reich is one of some 200 economists and academics who have offered Mrs. Clinton ideas and
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#30
That makes sense. So, what do you think of the family ties to Phil Gramm and UBS?
Octafish
Apr 2015
#222
Proof? H. Clinton, even though running for president, has been very quiet about her
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#68
I trust your evaluations of the situation in the US today. My question: Is this what those saying
jwirr
Apr 2015
#52
Thank you. I remember when it was possible to believe in humane values based on love,
jwirr
Apr 2015
#70
Love, nurturance, compassion, awe, all these basic life-giving emotions--
Jackpine Radical
Apr 2015
#73
+1. Time to abolish 30 years of Reaganism, neoliberal economics, somehow-
appalachiablue
Apr 2015
#72
On that I think we are all feeling kind of alone and that is terrible. We are DU. We need each other
jwirr
Apr 2015
#168
That is very true. The gop is going to go all the way because they have nothing to lose.
jwirr
Apr 2015
#171
I can see so much of that in my life. I am 73 live in a room in one of my grandson's home. He is
jwirr
Apr 2015
#186
Here's Chomsky Links if you want to check out...and his You Tube Videos/interviews:
KoKo
Apr 2015
#227
Reach out if you need. Plenty of us aren't too secure economically & otherwise nowdays.
appalachiablue
Apr 2015
#42
The ripping is already done. TPP is to consolidate corporate power over the world.
jwirr
Apr 2015
#57
Actually, the difference between a privateer and a pirate is that the former
Jackpine Radical
Apr 2015
#50
I know, the privateer is govt-state sanctioned, the pirate isn't. But they're both Thieves.
appalachiablue
Apr 2015
#53
Kissinger, Summers what next Rumsfled and Rice for Hillary? How spineless Democrats go along
whereisjustice
Apr 2015
#58
Greenspan, Summers and Bubba were the team that lobbied Congress to repeal Glass Steagall.
merrily
Apr 2015
#59
Think how different things would have been if they had just left FDR's Glass Steagall alone. The
jwirr
Apr 2015
#60
Sigh. You're probably right. As cynical as I think I have become, I am still too naive.
merrily
Apr 2015
#76
That's exactly how I feel. Then again, as o 2007, I still thought all I had to do to fix the US was
merrily
Apr 2015
#80
Greed - the most powerful, insidious and destructive addiction in the world. nt
hifiguy
Apr 2015
#160
This may be a naive question but if Hillary is doing the bidding of the one percent why are the Koch
demgrrrll
Apr 2015
#198
URL: http://www.wmcpa.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Big-Brother-is-watching-you.jpg
blkmusclmachine
Apr 2015
#217