Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama's playing 3D chess - TPP. We just gotta trust him. [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)18. Yes, he is... and I was not purposely misleading. Let me link to my
brain fart ok. We all tend to have them.
340. Forgive me 123
http://www.jacksonlewis.com/media/pnc/0/media.2380.pdf
Article 123 of Mexicos Constitution, entitled Labor and Social Security, expressly recognizes and protects employees basic inalienable rights including, but not limited to: vacation, overtime entitlement, job stability, maximum work shift, maternity rights, social security rights, salary protection, profit-sharing entitlement, severance payment in case of unfair dismissal, freedom of association (the right to unionize), and collective bargaining rights, including the right to strike.
http://www.nationalemploymentlawcouncil.org/nonmember/agenda_PDFs/2013/Basics_of_Mexican_Labor_Law.pdf
Since nafta strikes still happen, but far less often because the unions have been weakened. So are those coming back? In particular the CTM is very much weakened.
And it gets worst.
The Mexican Congress is set to pass labor law reform this week that will be devastating for millions of workers legal rights and incomes. Here members of the independent electrical utility workers union (SME) demonstrate against the law. Photo: SME.
The Mexican Congress looks set to pass a piece of fast-track labor law reform this week that could be devastating for millions of workers legal rights and incomes.
The changes both pro-business parties are agreed on would undermine the 44-hour work week by permitting subcontracting and temporary or part-time work for the first time.
Additional changes that would make it virtually impossible to organize or maintain genuine unions or to strike were part of the legislation introduced September 1, but it appears that some of those changes may be withdrawn under pressure.
- See more at: http://labornotes.org/blogs/2012/09/mexico%E2%80%99s-labor-law-changes-undermine-worker-rights#.dpuf
These reforms, with the rest of the pro business reforms, are in preparation for TTP. There is also an extensive energy reform that essentially privatizes PEMEX, or close to it. Education reform that apes NCLB. I could go on.
I am sorry, my mind kept going to the series of articles I had to memorize by heart in HS. My point still stands. TTP will not be good for workers.
You might live in that fantasy, the rest of us are not. What we are seeing in San Quintin is exactly what we expect to see TTP trade zone. You should find out more on this. And you and your friend got your talking points from the same fucking pace.
So go argue with labor. There is a reason why labor trade zone area wide dies not want these types of treaties.
When dealing with real-time broadcasts, I tend to think the onus for avoiding spoilers is primarily on the person who wants to avoid seeing spoilers. Expecting to read social media and be protected from spoilers seems unrealistic. Skinner
http://www.jacksonlewis.com/media/pnc/0/media.2380.pdf
Article 123 of Mexicos Constitution, entitled Labor and Social Security, expressly recognizes and protects employees basic inalienable rights including, but not limited to: vacation, overtime entitlement, job stability, maximum work shift, maternity rights, social security rights, salary protection, profit-sharing entitlement, severance payment in case of unfair dismissal, freedom of association (the right to unionize), and collective bargaining rights, including the right to strike.
http://www.nationalemploymentlawcouncil.org/nonmember/agenda_PDFs/2013/Basics_of_Mexican_Labor_Law.pdf
Since nafta strikes still happen, but far less often because the unions have been weakened. So are those coming back? In particular the CTM is very much weakened.
And it gets worst.
The Mexican Congress is set to pass labor law reform this week that will be devastating for millions of workers legal rights and incomes. Here members of the independent electrical utility workers union (SME) demonstrate against the law. Photo: SME.
The Mexican Congress looks set to pass a piece of fast-track labor law reform this week that could be devastating for millions of workers legal rights and incomes.
The changes both pro-business parties are agreed on would undermine the 44-hour work week by permitting subcontracting and temporary or part-time work for the first time.
Additional changes that would make it virtually impossible to organize or maintain genuine unions or to strike were part of the legislation introduced September 1, but it appears that some of those changes may be withdrawn under pressure.
- See more at: http://labornotes.org/blogs/2012/09/mexico%E2%80%99s-labor-law-changes-undermine-worker-rights#.dpuf
These reforms, with the rest of the pro business reforms, are in preparation for TTP. There is also an extensive energy reform that essentially privatizes PEMEX, or close to it. Education reform that apes NCLB. I could go on.
I am sorry, my mind kept going to the series of articles I had to memorize by heart in HS. My point still stands. TTP will not be good for workers.
You might live in that fantasy, the rest of us are not. What we are seeing in San Quintin is exactly what we expect to see TTP trade zone. You should find out more on this. And you and your friend got your talking points from the same fucking pace.
So go argue with labor. There is a reason why labor trade zone area wide dies not want these types of treaties.
When dealing with real-time broadcasts, I tend to think the onus for avoiding spoilers is primarily on the person who wants to avoid seeing spoilers. Expecting to read social media and be protected from spoilers seems unrealistic. Skinner
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6527884
So no, I was not doing that on purpose
I am not using buggy whip false analogies. I am not calling this a conspiracy or conspiracy theorists. I am not calling two nation states beggars. YOU ARE.
So please proceed governor.
As to the rest of what Summers said, he still stated that this is NOT HELPING THE MIDDLE CLASS. But I expect you to mischaracterize all that is told you, This is your MO. Include your MO also distraction.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hey, they weren't part of it initially, but the phones started ringing.. Wait till China can't
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#12
Because I'm dealing with conspiracy theorists who believe Obama is trying to make us slaves.
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#15
Summers: "Nonetheless I believe that the right TPP is very much in the American national interest."
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#17
I did.. This ain't NAFTA. The 40k calculation is based upon assumption that a trade
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#40
I'm not certain about the Columbia FTA, CAFTA or the Korean FTA; but, ...
1StrongBlackMan
Apr 2015
#37
I hope you are right but I am bookmarking for later praise or ridicule when this game plays out
corkhead
Apr 2015
#3
he's giving the republicans enough rope to hang themselves. And he's the only adult in
Doctor_J
Apr 2015
#6
I was watching National Lampoon's European Vacation the other day. When they hit
liberal_at_heart
Apr 2015
#10
Here he is. Your video shows just how pissed he is at Obama for ignoring him and doing a better
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#58
NAFTA was OK since he was an advisor, TPP which is an improvement isn't OK because Reich
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#61
By "renegotiated" do you mean how banks can now sue governments for derivative losses?
pa28
Apr 2015
#57
Wow, you are really misinformed. NAFTA included the very same provision, as have 2500 trade
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#60
NAFTA provided for complaints from member nations and financial penalties for failure to comply.
pa28
Apr 2015
#66
Do yourself a favor before knitting things from your imagination on what TPP is or what NAFTA was..
MrMickeysMom
Apr 2015
#67