Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Must I love HRC or hate her AS A CANDIDATE? [View all]Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)54. The major issues with these agreements are non-trade issues.
That's why Krugman, for example, who is a free trade advocate, has discussed how from a trade standpoint, the TPP is "not a big deal", as there are very few restrictions to trade still in existence, but now has come to the point where he would be relieved if the TPP failed to materialize, because of the fact that is is fundamentally about enhancing monopoly power, primarily through such measures as enhanced intellectual property restrictions, rather than removing barriers to trade.
When it is proposed that "experts on trade" come up with a trade deal, this obscures the sad reality that corporate interests continue to use "trade" agreements to do end runs around environmental law, labor law, safety regulations, and to establish sovereign tribunals to settle claims that governments attempting to fulfill their duty with regard to promoting the general welfare in these areas may be sued if such regulation negatively impacts projected profits, and all decisions are not subject to appeal within the judicial system.
As fallible as is our democratic Congressional system, decreasing Congressional authority and enhancing the processes of global corporate domination does not seem like the way forward.
'
'
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Another if you don't vote for Hillary you are voting Republican. You will go on my ignore list.
liberal_at_heart
Apr 2015
#43
Voting against or not for the Democrat in the General is voting for the Republican.
onehandle
Apr 2015
#49
It is kind of bizarre that expressing a dislike of some of Hillary's policies is labeled HATE.
djean111
Apr 2015
#3
Of course you can. I don't hate Hillary. I just won't vote for her because I don't believe
liberal_at_heart
Apr 2015
#6
i don't feel either way but it seems to mostly be the haters who think i should hate her
JI7
Apr 2015
#15
On DU? Yes, that's the new rule. Whether it's Hillary, the TPP, or whatever, it's all or nothing.
arcane1
Apr 2015
#18
I will not apologize for 100% opposing fast track. If TPP is good trade policy then it can
liberal_at_heart
Apr 2015
#22
I'm right there with you. Some supporters say we're just isolationists who want no trade whatsoever.
arcane1
Apr 2015
#24
The FT deal provides for submitting to the floor a bill that would limit Congressional ...
Faryn Balyncd
Apr 2015
#31
First of all, it's not just about 1 agreement, or limited to agreements current under negotiation.
Faryn Balyncd
Apr 2015
#45
She is closer to my thinking on the issues than anyone who has presented them selves or who others
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#19
What I've noticed is that the majority of posters on an email board like this post one or two
libdem4life
Apr 2015
#23
Yes you must, in this politics as team sport, or gang war, atmosphere that we seem to have now,
enough
Apr 2015
#27
I have abortion on my auto trash by keyword list. I get so tired of being told I don't
liberal_at_heart
Apr 2015
#28
You owe Hillary Clinton zilch. No love, no hate, no never-mind, not even good words.
cherokeeprogressive
Apr 2015
#46
The candidate I hope to see run has not entered the race and yet I am told there are two sides
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#47