Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
6. It's a win-win for the company whose actions were called "deceptive and immoral" by Senator Levin
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 11:24 PM
Apr 2015
Carl Levin: Goldman Sachs Decision Shows Either 'Weak Laws Or Weak Enforcement'

Reuters - Posted: 08/10/2012 2:32 pm EDT Updated: 10/10/2012 5:12 am EDT

* US Senator Levin asked for Goldman criminal probe in 2011

* Justice Department was 'thorough and impartial' -Goldman

WASHINGTON, Aug 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department's decision not to prosecute Goldman Sachs Group Inc for its subprime mortgage trades resulted from either "weak laws or weak enforcement," the senator who asked for a criminal investigation of the firm said on Friday.

A day after the department announced its decision, Democratic Senator Carl Levin reiterated in a written statement the criticisms he lodged against Goldman beginning more than two years ago. He called the firm's actions "deceptive and immoral."

~Snip~

"It misled investors by claiming its interests in those securities were 'aligned' with theirs while at the same time it was betting heavily against those same securities, and therefore against its own clients, to its own substantial profit," he said on Friday.

Goldman settled a related civil investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for $550 million in July 2010 without admitting wrongdoing...

~Snip~

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/10/carl-levin-goldman-sachs_n_1765408.html


How Goldman secretly bet on the U.S. housing crash

BY GREG GORDON
McClatchy NewspapersNovember 1, 2009


WASHINGTON — In 2006 and 2007, Goldman Sachs Group peddled more than $40 billion in securities backed by at least 200,000 risky home mortgages, but never told the buyers it was secretly betting that a sharp drop in U.S. housing prices would send the value of those securities plummeting.

Goldman's sales and its clandestine wagers, completed at the brink of the housing market meltdown, enabled the nation's premier investment bank to pass most of its potential losses to others before a flood of mortgage defaults staggered the U.S. and global economies.

Only later did investors discover that what Goldman had promoted as triple-A rated investments were closer to junk.

Now, pension funds, insurance companies, labor unions and foreign financial institutions that bought those dicey mortgage securities are facing large losses, and a five-month McClatchy investigation has found that Goldman's failure to disclose that it made secret, exotic bets on an imminent housing crash may have violated securities laws.

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/11/01/77791/how-goldman-secretly-bet-on-the.html#storylink=cpy

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Goldman Sachs primary: [View all] think Apr 2015 OP
GS will back Bush until the polls clearly favor Hillary. House of Roberts Apr 2015 #1
It's a win-win for the company whose actions were called "deceptive and immoral" by Senator Levin think Apr 2015 #6
Just in case anyone doubted that this was going on. 99th_Monkey Apr 2015 #2
That pretty much says it all tularetom Apr 2015 #3
"Blankfein has indicated he would be fine with either a Bush or Clinton presidency." woo me with science Apr 2015 #4
Hands down Hillary who will win the GS primary. Bye, Bye Bushie. Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #5
She will make a great republican president Joe Turner Apr 2015 #7
Nothing new here, same RW talking points Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #16
When has anyone on the right wing ever called Hillary a republican? think Apr 2015 #23
<crickets> But you expected that, right? n/t eridani Apr 2015 #25
The only one thing that makes Hillary preferable to the Repubs... Jester Messiah Apr 2015 #30
Lloyd Blankfein wins either way. When asked who he would vote for president in 2012 he said this: think Apr 2015 #8
Yes it's a win-win for Goldman-Sachs and the Oligarchy. Bye, bye 99%. nm rhett o rick Apr 2015 #12
Congress and the Senate and most importantly, local elections is where the action will be. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #21
More accurately termed the Vampire Squid primary... Fumesucker Apr 2015 #9
K&R liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #10
Partisan politics is for the little people. Those in power are neither Republicans nor Democrats. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #11
I am amazed how naive the Clinton supporters are not to figure out that when their candidate rhett o rick Apr 2015 #13
The good news is that more and more people ARE aware of the game that is being played. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #17
which is why we're being repeatedly told that concern about economics = lack of concern ND-Dem Apr 2015 #27
Yeah, that straw man has been making more appearances here than ED ads on FOX /nt Dragonfli Apr 2015 #28
thank you for noticing. i was thinking it was just me. ND-Dem Apr 2015 #29
Seen it as well and was trying to find the words to express my dissapointment at such accusations think Apr 2015 #33
Ya, it's hard to get excited. Local elections and state ballot issues may be the big thing in 2016 think Apr 2015 #19
GS has already won the auction JEB Apr 2015 #14
Hungry for needed change, voters looking forward to Bush vs. Clinton. whereisjustice Apr 2015 #15
OH GOD DAMN THIS SUCKS!!!!!!!!! Darb Apr 2015 #18
Huh? /nt think Apr 2015 #20
Okay, so what do you think about the FACTS in the OP? sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #22
GS is hedging their bet. They're good with Hillary or any Republican. AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #24
. Dragonfli Apr 2015 #26
THIS is who we need to beat in 2016. n/t DirkGently Apr 2015 #31
Damn tootin'! hifiguy Apr 2015 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Goldman Sachs primary...»Reply #6