Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Goldman Sachs primary: [View all]think
(11,641 posts)6. It's a win-win for the company whose actions were called "deceptive and immoral" by Senator Levin
Carl Levin: Goldman Sachs Decision Shows Either 'Weak Laws Or Weak Enforcement'
Reuters - Posted: 08/10/2012 2:32 pm EDT Updated: 10/10/2012 5:12 am EDT
* US Senator Levin asked for Goldman criminal probe in 2011
* Justice Department was 'thorough and impartial' -Goldman
WASHINGTON, Aug 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department's decision not to prosecute Goldman Sachs Group Inc for its subprime mortgage trades resulted from either "weak laws or weak enforcement," the senator who asked for a criminal investigation of the firm said on Friday.
A day after the department announced its decision, Democratic Senator Carl Levin reiterated in a written statement the criticisms he lodged against Goldman beginning more than two years ago. He called the firm's actions "deceptive and immoral."
~Snip~
"It misled investors by claiming its interests in those securities were 'aligned' with theirs while at the same time it was betting heavily against those same securities, and therefore against its own clients, to its own substantial profit," he said on Friday.
Goldman settled a related civil investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for $550 million in July 2010 without admitting wrongdoing...
~Snip~
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/10/carl-levin-goldman-sachs_n_1765408.html
Reuters - Posted: 08/10/2012 2:32 pm EDT Updated: 10/10/2012 5:12 am EDT
* US Senator Levin asked for Goldman criminal probe in 2011
* Justice Department was 'thorough and impartial' -Goldman
WASHINGTON, Aug 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department's decision not to prosecute Goldman Sachs Group Inc for its subprime mortgage trades resulted from either "weak laws or weak enforcement," the senator who asked for a criminal investigation of the firm said on Friday.
A day after the department announced its decision, Democratic Senator Carl Levin reiterated in a written statement the criticisms he lodged against Goldman beginning more than two years ago. He called the firm's actions "deceptive and immoral."
~Snip~
"It misled investors by claiming its interests in those securities were 'aligned' with theirs while at the same time it was betting heavily against those same securities, and therefore against its own clients, to its own substantial profit," he said on Friday.
Goldman settled a related civil investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for $550 million in July 2010 without admitting wrongdoing...
~Snip~
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/10/carl-levin-goldman-sachs_n_1765408.html
How Goldman secretly bet on the U.S. housing crash
BY GREG GORDON
McClatchy NewspapersNovember 1, 2009
WASHINGTON In 2006 and 2007, Goldman Sachs Group peddled more than $40 billion in securities backed by at least 200,000 risky home mortgages, but never told the buyers it was secretly betting that a sharp drop in U.S. housing prices would send the value of those securities plummeting.
Goldman's sales and its clandestine wagers, completed at the brink of the housing market meltdown, enabled the nation's premier investment bank to pass most of its potential losses to others before a flood of mortgage defaults staggered the U.S. and global economies.
Only later did investors discover that what Goldman had promoted as triple-A rated investments were closer to junk.
Now, pension funds, insurance companies, labor unions and foreign financial institutions that bought those dicey mortgage securities are facing large losses, and a five-month McClatchy investigation has found that Goldman's failure to disclose that it made secret, exotic bets on an imminent housing crash may have violated securities laws.
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/11/01/77791/how-goldman-secretly-bet-on-the.html#storylink=cpy
BY GREG GORDON
McClatchy NewspapersNovember 1, 2009
WASHINGTON In 2006 and 2007, Goldman Sachs Group peddled more than $40 billion in securities backed by at least 200,000 risky home mortgages, but never told the buyers it was secretly betting that a sharp drop in U.S. housing prices would send the value of those securities plummeting.
Goldman's sales and its clandestine wagers, completed at the brink of the housing market meltdown, enabled the nation's premier investment bank to pass most of its potential losses to others before a flood of mortgage defaults staggered the U.S. and global economies.
Only later did investors discover that what Goldman had promoted as triple-A rated investments were closer to junk.
Now, pension funds, insurance companies, labor unions and foreign financial institutions that bought those dicey mortgage securities are facing large losses, and a five-month McClatchy investigation has found that Goldman's failure to disclose that it made secret, exotic bets on an imminent housing crash may have violated securities laws.
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/11/01/77791/how-goldman-secretly-bet-on-the.html#storylink=cpy
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's a win-win for the company whose actions were called "deceptive and immoral" by Senator Levin
think
Apr 2015
#6
"Blankfein has indicated he would be fine with either a Bush or Clinton presidency."
woo me with science
Apr 2015
#4
Lloyd Blankfein wins either way. When asked who he would vote for president in 2012 he said this:
think
Apr 2015
#8
Congress and the Senate and most importantly, local elections is where the action will be.
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#21
Partisan politics is for the little people. Those in power are neither Republicans nor Democrats.
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#11
I am amazed how naive the Clinton supporters are not to figure out that when their candidate
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#13
The good news is that more and more people ARE aware of the game that is being played.
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#17
which is why we're being repeatedly told that concern about economics = lack of concern
ND-Dem
Apr 2015
#27
Yeah, that straw man has been making more appearances here than ED ads on FOX /nt
Dragonfli
Apr 2015
#28
Seen it as well and was trying to find the words to express my dissapointment at such accusations
think
Apr 2015
#33