Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton Praises 'Progressive Champion' Elizabeth Warren [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)81. Not after they've said NO over fifty times. But how quick you went to the personal!!
I'm "cranky" because I don't share your opinion? Isn't THAT a loaded word!
If I wanted to be an asshole I'd get personal with you, too! But I'll eschew that "cheap shot" path...I don't think that kind of thing elevates the discourse, here.
I think anyone who wants to run SHOULD run. Warren has said she doesn't want to run, and since she's said it dozens and dozens of times, and I think, too, that she is a woman of her word, I do believe her--I think she knows what she wants, and running for the presidency isn't in her wheelhouse.
Tell you what--you get back to me if she changes her mind. I doubt you'll be getting back to me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
EW has already endorsed HRC. They play different roles within the Democratic Party. EW is great at
freshwest
Apr 2015
#14
I see your point, but I think it's because Warren is fighting Wall Street while Hillary has appeared
DesertDiamond
Apr 2015
#37
That is EXACTLY the reason. Anyone who doesn't see that hasn't been paying attention.
whathehell
Apr 2015
#80
Agreed. These Democrats have the same goals and work together. Good analyis on the origin. n/t
freshwest
Apr 2015
#38
I see this, too. Two Powerful Women...Oh noes. Even Caroline Kennedy was tagged with
libdem4life
Apr 2015
#64
I think you'll find that the Left's populism is sweepting the country and that their support of
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#78
I assume that a former Republican like Warren sees Hillary as one of the women who pulled her
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#16
Well someone or something did, Liz was a Reagan/Bush Republican until she was pushing 50.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#46
I think this is how EW went left she followed Hillary, Hillary was Democrat in
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#73
HRC's farther left than EW per Ballotpedia. Warren is more Populist. I researched it:
freshwest
Apr 2015
#19
praised the woman in the Senate promoting/furthering the cause of corporate financial regulation?
bigtree
Apr 2015
#10
+1 "Goldman Sachs once paid $200,000 to hear former Secretary Clinton do a little talking"
L0oniX
Apr 2015
#30
Warren has said she's not running. What part of NO doesn't mean NO to a liberal or
MADem
Apr 2015
#69
Not after they've said NO over fifty times. But how quick you went to the personal!!
MADem
Apr 2015
#81
while "centrist" hatemongering bullies HERE attack progressives as party traitors...
carolinayellowdog
Apr 2015
#34
So which statement would be more reflective of actual policies Clinton would pursue as POUS
JonLP24
Apr 2015
#62
Records show Warren may be following Hillary's lead, are you impressed now
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#65