Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Whowzer! Bill and Hillary In Their Prime [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)49. I am going to want to see a link to prove that assertion, because I can't find her saying that
anywhere. I have looked for "I registered as an independent" or words to that effect from Warren, and I can't put those words in her mouth. She did say she voted for both Ds and Rs because she didn't want one party to "dominate," but she also said -- more than once-- that she was a REPUBLICAN.
I can put "I was a Republican" in her mouth--OFTEN. Links elsewhere in this thread are very clear on that score. Not just "I was a Republican for five years" either. Those five years are known because the PA voting records are public--and George Stephanopolous's staff went looking for them.
For all those quaking on the right at the sight of an ascendant Warren, rest easy. Warrens no lefty. In fact, Warren was a registered Republican into her 40s. When it comes to ideology, Warren makes for a rotten heir to Kennedy.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/10/24/elizabeth-warren-i-created-occupy-wall-street.html
But here's where a lot of the "agita" is coming from, I suspect--and way too many useful tools are going along with it:
On cable television and in private strategy sessions, conservatives are steadily stoking the flames of a movement to recruit Ms. Warren, who has said she will not run but whose anti-Wall Street economic message resonates with the liberal base of the Democratic Party.
...An easy path to the nomination could allow Mrs. Clinton to enter a general election with more funding than the Republican nominee, who would have had to spend heavily to beat a wide field of competitors. Ms. Warren represents Republicans best hope for an expensive, prolonged battle for the Democratic nomination, weakening Mrs. Clinton along the way, political operatives on both sides say.
...An easy path to the nomination could allow Mrs. Clinton to enter a general election with more funding than the Republican nominee, who would have had to spend heavily to beat a wide field of competitors. Ms. Warren represents Republicans best hope for an expensive, prolonged battle for the Democratic nomination, weakening Mrs. Clinton along the way, political operatives on both sides say.
http://www.politicususa.com/2015/01/28/desperate-republicans-recruit-elizabeth-warren-run-hillary-clinton.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hmm... I guess that is why Wellesley College voted her president of the College Republicans then?
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#1
I'm sorry, I should have noted that they likely voted her more for her RW Republican values...
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#10
That picture illustrates "I was married when I was nineteen..." in her Senate intro ad.
MADem
Apr 2015
#15
She was a registered as independent until 1991 and then registered as a Republican and switched to
Luminous Animal
Apr 2015
#28
Yeah, so you say... but she liked the GOP because she preferred their positions on markets.
MADem
Apr 2015
#41
What 'shit' is Hillary taking on DU? If a woman running for public office can't take criticism of
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#69
It would be even nicer if people who call them Democrats stopped using gender as an excuse for
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#77
Amazing. Victimhood, it is an excuse to distract when legitimate questions on policies cannot be
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#81
But, it's not amazing, it's DU-speak, totally normal, absolutely accepted, language at this forum.
Major Hogwash
Apr 2015
#82
It's not accepted, I can assure of that. Don't take people ignoring that nonsense as a sign that
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#83
Sorry if I offended you by calling some Republicans sexist the way they voted for people...
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#26
She was working for people like John Lindsay, who was more liberal than the majority of Dems today.
pnwmom
Apr 2015
#84
Please do!!! I think she's brilliant--and she (unlike some) knows the meaning of the
MADem
Apr 2015
#17
Some should be as eagerly dissecting the 9 people running on the GOP ticket.
misterhighwasted
Apr 2015
#22
Do you see the irony of reminding us Hillary was a Republican in her teens
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#16
Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't one supporting and organizing...
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#23
Warren was registered as an independent until 1991. That was the year she registered as
Luminous Animal
Apr 2015
#31
That's not what she said. But hey, keep telling yourself that it was "just" five years. nt
MADem
Apr 2015
#44
She also says "I was a Republican" over and over again. Check your context of those words.
MADem
Apr 2015
#59
Hmm. hmm. So, what was she before she registered as a Republican in 1991?
Luminous Animal
Apr 2015
#63
Uh, she was living in PA during those years. Before that, she lived in TX and NJ.
MADem
Apr 2015
#68
She was a registered republican from 91-96 So, who did she vote for when Reagan was running? Pal.
Luminous Animal
Apr 2015
#57
Yes a Bush girl I hear. Glad they both found their way to the Dem side in the end.
misterhighwasted
Apr 2015
#25
She registered Democratic in 1996. Five years before Bush became president.
Luminous Animal
Apr 2015
#35
I don't know who she voted for. My reference was to her serving under Bush as a Fellow Republican.
misterhighwasted
Apr 2015
#36
What's up with that?.. dumping misinformation.. the hate has rendered them insipid..
Cha
Apr 2015
#76
I am going to want to see a link to prove that assertion, because I can't find her saying that
MADem
Apr 2015
#49
I think YOU need to "try try again." Your link reads like she was an independent AFTER Pennsylvania
MADem
Apr 2015
#60