General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A shout out to "social issues" [View all]BainsBane
(57,785 posts)The OP is talking about the GOP vs. the Democratic party and a bourgeois notion of politics that you intractability cling to.
You don't get it because you're views are so tied to your own class- and race-based assumptions, you can't imagine anyone outside that country club world has value. It has nothing to do with the DLC or any other politician. While you can think only about one political candidate, the rest of us are talking about our lives.
You do not use the established definition of social vs economic. You use a race and class-based one that dismisses the concerns and economic survival of the majority of Americans as "social" and inconsequential. You promote your own narrow class-interests and beyond that dismiss the basic rights of anyone else to articulate theirs.
I remember you were one of the characters that came into the thread I posted about Marxism vs. Rand Paul some 9 months ago and insisted it was some cryptic message in support of Hillary Clinton. You are so blinded by your opposition to her, you understand and see nothing else. You reduce large issues to the small because you think about nothing but Clinton.
I'll be clear. I do not care who you vote for of if you even vote Democrat. I won't be posting any OPs telling people to vote for. That's not what I do. But when you insist discussions of Marxism or political labels are all about some cryptic DLC message to get a horrible woman elected, you are lost to any political discussion.