Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Hillary is playing progressives for fools: Why you shouldn’t believe her populist talk on trade" [View all]samsingh
(18,426 posts)116. she got hammered and the repugs lied about everything
Obamacare while not ideal, is a large step in the right direction. Hopefully people see that a type of government sponsored healthcare has helped society and not bankrupted the country. Hopefully people will be more supportive of expansion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
136 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Hillary is playing progressives for fools: Why you shouldn’t believe her populist talk on trade" [View all]
RiverLover
Apr 2015
OP
Only when she launched her first presidential bid, in 2007, did she begin to argue that NAFTA “has
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#7
I agree that the OP subject is wrong. It should say "Hillary is trying to play progressives
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#25
What exactly is her "populist message"? Maybe that she thinks that all Americans should
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#114
you know there's a new book out on the clintons being pushed by one of breitbart's "journalists"
Romeo.lima333
Apr 2015
#11
Trade with Canada and Mexico is 75% of the TPP. NAFTA is being 'renegotiated'.
pampango
Apr 2015
#14
i doubt anyone is being fooled. it is articles like this. that must call others fools,
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#22
I think the author is speaking to HRC's poll numbers. Lots of low info voters out there are
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#27
"Hillary is playing progressives for fools" that was written to insult. i am not fooled....
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#37
it absolutely was your intent to insult clinton supporters, and this "apology" is also
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#43
look. this is simple. you want me to read an article. do not start by stating,
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#46
no. i am not confused. i never stated you wrote the article. you also did not address what i said.
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#85
Even the author of the article ISNT calling progressives "fools", only that HRC is playing us for
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#93
i think it is pretty obvious that i believe there is a difference us being played, and those that
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#102
Any article that claims to 'delve' into Hillary's record on trade agreements which mentions NAFTA
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#28
They never mention Al Gore was waving a pom-pom in each hand when he was cheer-leading NAFTA. nt
Snotcicles
Apr 2015
#39
NAFTA, both Parties supported NAFTA, it was negotiated and signed by George Bush and did not
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#81
Labor gets the shaft every time. They say one thing going in, well you know the rest. nt
Snotcicles
Apr 2015
#90
That doesn't mean there won't be. Trash the thread if these articles bother you. The rest of
Autumn
Apr 2015
#54
You may think this is absurd, but I actually think Hillary will shift left once elected.
DCBob
Apr 2015
#65
Thanks for calling me an idiot. That'll surely convince me to change my position.
jeff47
Apr 2015
#69
I dont know anything about third wayers but I would not trash any Democrat running for President..
DCBob
Apr 2015
#126
in 1994 Hillary went all out to get universal health care - she got beat up very bad
samsingh
Apr 2015
#35
I agree. What is interesting about all these down with Hillary threads is they don't
still_one
Apr 2015
#77
There are many educated, successful people capable of being our president & representing all
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#47
I will give her credit for the things I have always expected her to support: Social Security,
jwirr
Apr 2015
#51
I hope we get at least one hundred posts similar to this every day until the convention.
Buzz Clik
Apr 2015
#74
Why do you think this article fails to discuss her Senate record, which includes voting against both
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#82
Tell your pal cali that that link goes to a different article, and my comment was that this article
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#115
My point, which you sailed past I am sure out of great respect, is that this article purports to
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#113
With Hillary you get Bill, with Scott Walker you get the Koch Brothers...
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#104
Now is the time to fix that and if folks insist on not doing the needed fixing then 2020
TheKentuckian
Apr 2015
#129
I disagree. My vote is to keep the country from the evil the GOP is capable of doing if elected.
Vinca
Apr 2015
#134
Nope, I voted for Gore though in hindsight I regret it because he didn't get inaugurated anyway
TheKentuckian
Apr 2015
#136