Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Hillary is playing progressives for fools: Why you shouldn’t believe her populist talk on trade" [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(106,212 posts)117. It's the one with the pinned "ReadyForSomeoneElse.org" thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1277
Obviously the hosts of that group have an official "anti-Hillary" line, or they wouldn't have that pinned.
You're welcome.
Obviously the hosts of that group have an official "anti-Hillary" line, or they wouldn't have that pinned.
You're welcome.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
136 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Hillary is playing progressives for fools: Why you shouldn’t believe her populist talk on trade" [View all]
RiverLover
Apr 2015
OP
Only when she launched her first presidential bid, in 2007, did she begin to argue that NAFTA “has
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#7
I agree that the OP subject is wrong. It should say "Hillary is trying to play progressives
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#25
What exactly is her "populist message"? Maybe that she thinks that all Americans should
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#114
you know there's a new book out on the clintons being pushed by one of breitbart's "journalists"
Romeo.lima333
Apr 2015
#11
Trade with Canada and Mexico is 75% of the TPP. NAFTA is being 'renegotiated'.
pampango
Apr 2015
#14
i doubt anyone is being fooled. it is articles like this. that must call others fools,
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#22
I think the author is speaking to HRC's poll numbers. Lots of low info voters out there are
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#27
"Hillary is playing progressives for fools" that was written to insult. i am not fooled....
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#37
it absolutely was your intent to insult clinton supporters, and this "apology" is also
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#43
look. this is simple. you want me to read an article. do not start by stating,
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#46
no. i am not confused. i never stated you wrote the article. you also did not address what i said.
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#85
Even the author of the article ISNT calling progressives "fools", only that HRC is playing us for
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#93
i think it is pretty obvious that i believe there is a difference us being played, and those that
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#102
Any article that claims to 'delve' into Hillary's record on trade agreements which mentions NAFTA
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#28
They never mention Al Gore was waving a pom-pom in each hand when he was cheer-leading NAFTA. nt
Snotcicles
Apr 2015
#39
NAFTA, both Parties supported NAFTA, it was negotiated and signed by George Bush and did not
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#81
Labor gets the shaft every time. They say one thing going in, well you know the rest. nt
Snotcicles
Apr 2015
#90
That doesn't mean there won't be. Trash the thread if these articles bother you. The rest of
Autumn
Apr 2015
#54
You may think this is absurd, but I actually think Hillary will shift left once elected.
DCBob
Apr 2015
#65
Thanks for calling me an idiot. That'll surely convince me to change my position.
jeff47
Apr 2015
#69
I dont know anything about third wayers but I would not trash any Democrat running for President..
DCBob
Apr 2015
#126
in 1994 Hillary went all out to get universal health care - she got beat up very bad
samsingh
Apr 2015
#35
I agree. What is interesting about all these down with Hillary threads is they don't
still_one
Apr 2015
#77
There are many educated, successful people capable of being our president & representing all
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#47
I will give her credit for the things I have always expected her to support: Social Security,
jwirr
Apr 2015
#51
I hope we get at least one hundred posts similar to this every day until the convention.
Buzz Clik
Apr 2015
#74
Why do you think this article fails to discuss her Senate record, which includes voting against both
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#82
Tell your pal cali that that link goes to a different article, and my comment was that this article
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#115
My point, which you sailed past I am sure out of great respect, is that this article purports to
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#113
With Hillary you get Bill, with Scott Walker you get the Koch Brothers...
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#104
Now is the time to fix that and if folks insist on not doing the needed fixing then 2020
TheKentuckian
Apr 2015
#129
I disagree. My vote is to keep the country from the evil the GOP is capable of doing if elected.
Vinca
Apr 2015
#134
Nope, I voted for Gore though in hindsight I regret it because he didn't get inaugurated anyway
TheKentuckian
Apr 2015
#136