Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I think some protest tactics like blocking walkways hurt more than help progressive causes. [View all]joshcryer
(62,536 posts)94. Not very much if at all.
I used to participate in the black bloc in my youth. I since stopped doing it though I felt it did serve a purpose (a lot of kettling goes on in mass protest and people get hurt, if you distract the police, it can be a good thing in the long run; I know that is extremely odious to say, and I am not advocating violence, but I won't condemn it when it happens because I know why it happens).
It's pretty low on a scale of achieving change that exists. I mean, you want change, run for office, elect people, vote, that's how you get things done. It's slow, but that's the only way to really have a powerful effect. Colorado legalized marijuana. That wasn't done by mass protests. It was done at the polls and getting out the vote.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think some protest tactics like blocking walkways hurt more than help progressive causes. [View all]
alp227
Apr 2015
OP
The point of a demonstration is to take an overlooked problem and put it in peoples' faces.
HereSince1628
Apr 2015
#1
How many riots does it take to irredeemably piss-off the people whose lives were trashed?
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2015
#99
You said, "That riot is not every riot." The word "that" was used in the determining sense.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2015
#116
On what objective measure are you basing your cost-benefit analysis/guess?
LanternWaste
Apr 2015
#27
That was not a discriminitory remark. It was a reminder that the same stuff was said about the
bravenak
Apr 2015
#68
"as those poooor inconvenience folks who never have to deal with racism and shit..."
oberliner
Apr 2015
#10
You wrote that the people being inconvenienced never have to deal with racism
oberliner
Apr 2015
#30
No doubt, the first world convenience of many people was disrupted on August 28, 1963.
LanternWaste
Apr 2015
#11
The March on Washington was 20+ years in the making, and was part of a large and multi-faceted
Chathamization
Apr 2015
#28
How about effectiveness? Do you think the Days of Rage and the March on Washington were equally
Chathamization
Apr 2015
#40
I agree with you. A bunch of people holding signs and marching draws attention. A bunch of people
okaawhatever
Apr 2015
#22
What people really mean when they complain about 'Black Lives Matter' protests
gollygee
Apr 2015
#25
I'm fine with white folks writing about black stuff. As long as they're not being assholes.
bravenak
Apr 2015
#50
Regardless of the cause, it comes down to one question: is the tactic effective?
arcane1
Apr 2015
#29
So an inconvnience to the people that use that gate is worsre than police murdering an unarmed
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2015
#76