Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton called for 'toppling' the 1% [View all]RiverLover
(7,830 posts)80. Hello? What do you think FDR's Glass-Steagall did? Which protected us for 50 years?
Until Clinton, Rubins, Summers & their conservative colleagues in congress dismantled it, allowing Wall Street investment banking firms to gamble with their depositors' money that was held in commercial banks. (That is what the term "broken into pieces" refers to, not "toppling the 1%". Maybe you can tell her that & she'll clean up her fake populism to make it less obvious that its fake.)
And btw, after the 2008 crash, Dodd-Frank didn't address that problem. Gensler most likely had a huge role in making sure of it.
Warren tried to pass a bi-partisan 21st century Glass-Steagall act in 2013, but too many in congress are bought by big banks~
...The bill is more than a mere a reinstatement of the original 1933 Glass-Steagall Act, however. It would also bar commercial banks from some of the newer, more complex practices that they became infamous for in the wake of the recession, including trading complex derivatives and swaps or engaging in hedge fund and private equity activities. Warren explained in a conference call with reporters on Thursday that the new bill also seeks to close loopholes created by regulators interpretation of the original bill in the 1980s and 90s preceding its repeal.
The repeal of Glass-Steagall allowed banks to expand rapidly in size, to a stage where the top 0.2 percent of banks control nearly 70 percent of all banking assets. Even after the 2008 financial crisis, the biggest banks continued to grow. Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have criticized these banks for being not only too big to fail, but also too big for jail or for trial.
Support for restoring the banking firewalll has come from various corners since the 2008 financial crisis. Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz argued at the height of the recession, that the repeal created a high-risk gambling mentality. Two former chairman of Citigroup, Richard Parsons and Sanford Weill who once had a portrait of himself in his office called The Shatterer of Glass-Steagall, have endorsed restoring the firewall. Citigroup, which was bailed out during in 2008, was the first big beneficiary of the firewalls repeal. Even Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) has said that he agrees with reinstating the Glass-Steagall Act.
Americans want safe banks, Warren said when asked how she would respond to opponents of Glass-Steagall. The banks that handle their checking and savings accounts should be rock-solid secure, and they should not be juicing their profits by taking those insured deposits and insuring them in wild financial schemes. McCain echoed those comments in a statement, adding, If enacted, the 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act would not end Too-Big-to-Fail. But, it would rebuild the wall between commercial and investment banking that was in place for over 60 years, restore confidence in the system, and reduce risk for the American taxpayer. ...
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/07/12/2288301/21st-century-glass-steagall/
The repeal of Glass-Steagall allowed banks to expand rapidly in size, to a stage where the top 0.2 percent of banks control nearly 70 percent of all banking assets. Even after the 2008 financial crisis, the biggest banks continued to grow. Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have criticized these banks for being not only too big to fail, but also too big for jail or for trial.
Support for restoring the banking firewalll has come from various corners since the 2008 financial crisis. Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz argued at the height of the recession, that the repeal created a high-risk gambling mentality. Two former chairman of Citigroup, Richard Parsons and Sanford Weill who once had a portrait of himself in his office called The Shatterer of Glass-Steagall, have endorsed restoring the firewall. Citigroup, which was bailed out during in 2008, was the first big beneficiary of the firewalls repeal. Even Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) has said that he agrees with reinstating the Glass-Steagall Act.
Americans want safe banks, Warren said when asked how she would respond to opponents of Glass-Steagall. The banks that handle their checking and savings accounts should be rock-solid secure, and they should not be juicing their profits by taking those insured deposits and insuring them in wild financial schemes. McCain echoed those comments in a statement, adding, If enacted, the 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act would not end Too-Big-to-Fail. But, it would rebuild the wall between commercial and investment banking that was in place for over 60 years, restore confidence in the system, and reduce risk for the American taxpayer. ...
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/07/12/2288301/21st-century-glass-steagall/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I agree. It's total bullshit. Banks suck up to clients with much less money.
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#90
I like this photo with Muhammad Ali but I can't post it to appear as a photo.
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#4
I think I was rude to you the other day. We both got a little heated....
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#11
Hey JD, it's almost the end of the month. Soon as Bernie announces we can get busy
Autumn
Apr 2015
#39
I like you very much as a poster, posts like this are why, at least you are trying to do it
Dragonfli
Apr 2015
#10
She is tellling portions of her agenda and where she wants to take the country
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#14
Hillary is needed by this country. All the naysayers will also benefit from her agenda but can't
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#12
Yes, but they need to get their grubby hands out of our govt & stop rigging things in
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#71
Hello? What do you think FDR's Glass-Steagall did? Which protected us for 50 years?
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#80
Wrong. She was in her mid-40s. So for the past 20 years, she's not only voted for Dems,
RiverLover
Apr 2015
#107
TY. And one of the best pictures of Mandela I've ever seen. In the meanwhile...
freshwest
Apr 2015
#28
Because this one wouldn't work before my dear friend, Sid, put it in photobucket for me.
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#46
Then why do ninety one percent of my fellow Democrats have a favorable opinion of him?
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#62
I know, right? I doubt she said it, and if she said it she had to be joking or lying!
NYC_SKP
Apr 2015
#70
Phony ass staffer marketing stunt. A mismatch with her actual rhetoric to say the least.
TheKentuckian
Apr 2015
#73
I'm Ready For Oligarchy - Are You? - Vote HRC - The 1% Manchurian Candidate
cantbeserious
Apr 2015
#78
BS. She only says that because Obama is fast tracking TPP and that gives her cover to say
Katashi_itto
Apr 2015
#79
Is she also for putting the fraudsters and banksters among them in jail?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Apr 2015
#85
"She was Elizabeth Warren Before Elizabeth Warren was Elizabeth Warren"
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2015
#97