Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

niyad

(131,225 posts)
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 11:43 AM Apr 2015

New abortion controversy hits Congress (allowing women to be fired for using birth control!) [View all]


New abortion controversy hits Congress
Pelosi: 'Allowing employers to fire employees for using birth control ... is unconscionable'
-

The same day that the Senate reached a deal on abortion language in a bill to combat human trafficking, the House of Representatives began considering legislation that is igniting a new controversy over the divisive social issue.


The House Oversight Committee approved a resolution on Tuesday night with a party line vote that would attempt to overturn a law passed by the District of Columbia Council in December that bans employers from taking punitive action against any employees for using abortion services or birth control. The bill could be scheduled for a full House vote as early as next week.

The new House resolution, sponsored by Tennessee Rep. Diane Black, says the D.C. law, the "Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Amendment Act," accomplishes the opposite of what its name implies.

"This coercive measure would ban pro-life organizations in D.C. from even considering a job seeker's views on abortion as a condition of employment," Black said in a statement. "This is an affront to the conscience rights of every American who believes, as I do, in the cause of protecting the unborn. Congress must not remain silent while this injustice unfolds."

The Heritage Foundation and other conservative groups have pressed the GOP-led Congress to block the D.C. law. In an analysis published by two Heritage policy analysts, the group asserts that anti-abortion rights groups based in Washington would be faced with decisions about hiring candidates that could conflict with their beliefs.

. . . . .



http://www.kionrightnow.com/news/politics/new-abortion-controversy-hits-congress/32494598
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No, simply put No... AuntPatsy Apr 2015 #1
or, as an old friend used to say, "not no, but billy hellllll, no!) niyad Apr 2015 #3
and Hell no! ananda Apr 2015 #5
contact info for "congressMAN" diane black niyad Apr 2015 #2
This is so sickening. Did anyone doubt that they would sufrommich Apr 2015 #4
their hatred for women, and their glee in doing everything in their power to screw women niyad Apr 2015 #6
I swear, every time they open their mouths I think of sufrommich Apr 2015 #11
I think of all my young friends, and shudder at the world we are leaving them. niyad Apr 2015 #12
It just makes me sick that a woman's basic right to control her own sufrommich Apr 2015 #13
SO WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT???? calimary Apr 2015 #18
I agree with every word you posted. nt sufrommich Apr 2015 #21
I always said, framing Safe Abortion Care as a privacy issue was a big mistake. BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2015 #30
I am 100% with you, thanks for laying it all out there for everyone to see emulatorloo Apr 2015 #34
The Greedy Old Plutocrats seem to have borrowed a philosophy from hifiguy Apr 2015 #37
Have you heard the saying "they want the barefoot and pregnant"? This is it Maraya1969 Apr 2015 #7
sad to see this in the 21st century. we seem to be racing backwards at light speed. niyad Apr 2015 #9
too much effing power, and a church on every corner. BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2015 #32
Back door institutionalizing religion Kber Apr 2015 #8
oh, and don't forget to whine about how "persecuted" you are as you are doing this. niyad Apr 2015 #10
Yes of course! Kber Apr 2015 #14
+1000 Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2015 #17
^ n/t BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2015 #33
Kicking for those who have not seen it AuntPatsy Apr 2015 #15
thank you. niyad Apr 2015 #16
What is wrong with these people? Johonny Apr 2015 #19
kick angrychair Apr 2015 #20
You must be born into a world They_Live Apr 2015 #22
Yes, but women have the right to openly carry guns. tclambert Apr 2015 #23
What GOPers are trying to do is to keep as many women out of the work force Iliyah Apr 2015 #24
This is unconstitutional. The idea of not using birth control in not common to all churches. jwirr Apr 2015 #25
Money-grubbing CEOs should be thrilled Ilsa Apr 2015 #26
We need to accuse them of treating women like Ilsa Apr 2015 #27
Right-wing Christians need to realize that their 'freedom' does not allow them to coerce others Maedhros Apr 2015 #28
... Arugula Latte Apr 2015 #29
WTF? SoapBox Apr 2015 #31
And this is LESS GOVERNMENT how? underpants Apr 2015 #35
WTGDF? 3catwoman3 Apr 2015 #36
Hey Democrats? Where's the bill to make that DC law a Federal law? jeff47 Apr 2015 #38
. . . . niyad Apr 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New abortion controversy ...