Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)

7. See, I think you're enforcing your personal viewpoint by doing that.

Reply to H2O Man (Reply #4)

Wed Apr 22, 2015, 12:49 PM

Apr 2015

The rules don't say 'really, really offensive'. They say 'rude, insensitive' etc. You're deliberately not hiding posts that SHOULD be hidden when you impose your own stricter standard for hiding. Yes, you should hold the same standard for everyone, but that standard should be the one given to you by the site owners.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hiding Posts [View all] samsingh Apr 2015 OP

If only... NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #1

Good luck with that. nt Tarheel_Dem Apr 2015 #2

People should use good judgement on a jury and not look to get even. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #3

Recommended. H2O Man Apr 2015 #4

See, I think you're enforcing your personal viewpoint by doing that. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #7

problem is people have different lines in the sand regarding rude and insensitive Romeo.lima333 Apr 2015 #8

Sure, everything is subjective. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #9

Sorry Erich, But We Disagree ProfessorGAC Apr 2015 #11

'over the top' is one of criteria. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #12

Then Read Your Post Through The Lens Of Another ProfessorGAC Apr 2015 #18

Yes, it does. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #22

If a post doesn't violate the TOS, then there is no reason to hide it. To some people, disagreeing sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #15

Then why are we given those reasons for hiding it? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #17

Well, I agree that it would raise the standards of discourse here if people did hide 'rude' posts. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #23

Your definition of rude seems pretty close to mine. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #25

Not what Skinner says HERVEPA Apr 2015 #29

The Admins, not juries, enforce the TOS... SidDithers Apr 2015 #31

I've served on juries cwydro Apr 2015 #5

I've never insulted an alerter, but I don't necessaily think it's out of bounds tishaLA Apr 2015 #13

I would add that you should not vote NOT to hide a post simply because you think Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #6

Conservatives are not capable of making objective judgments. This is the major Zorra Apr 2015 #10

A clear violation of what rules? pintobean Apr 2015 #14

Excellent post and point..... Whiskeytide Apr 2015 #16

a huge responsibility is raising a child...just to put it in persepective snooper2 Apr 2015 #19

hiding rightwing advocacy is what makes this a liberal/progressive place. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #20

I opt out of jury duty olddots Apr 2015 #21

I do as well. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #24

I agree with you but the posts are not hidden by juries. former9thward Apr 2015 #26

Well-said! I take my jury service seriously, and end up hiding maybe 3 out of 10 times arcane1 Apr 2015 #27

Why is this meta post not locked? nt TBF Apr 2015 #28

Perhaps your post should be hidden, since it is more Meta than the one you are complaining about? HERVEPA Apr 2015 #30

Locking - host consensus that this is meta. cbayer Apr 2015 #32