Elizabeth Warren Fires Back at Obama:

[KMOD]

75. Hoyt, you were alerted on

On Wed Apr 22, 2015, 01:54 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

If Warren would take a second to think about it, Congress could ask Obama and trade reps to go back
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6549132

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

"it's just hard to comprehend with folks like Warren playing politics and spreading misinformation."

I ask you: Does referring to a popular Democrat as though she was a wingnut ("with folks like Warren&quot and accusing her of "playing politics and spreading misinformation" seem to run counter to this forum's purpose, and maybe something that would be ordinarily be seen on a right-wing website? It certainly does to me, and seems to conform to the following TOS violation: "Don't do anything else which is similarly disruptive.

Just because it isn't listed here, doesn't mean it's ok. If you post anything which is obviously disruptive, malicious, or repugnant to this community, its members, or its values, you risk being in violation of these Terms of Service."

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Apr 22, 2015, 02:07 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: There is no question in my mind that Hoyt is a malicious right-wing intruder. I knew this from about a couple weeks ago for sure, but this alerted post underscores my conviction. I will vote to hide each and every post he contributes here to DU, from this point forward. But even on the merits of the alert, I agree with the alerter, and so I vote to hide.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: OK, you think this is another RW troll stirring it up. I don't know and don't care. Deal with the words on the screen and debate them without using alerts to avoid a proper argument.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Stop playing games. The President himself said last night that some were playing politics with the issue, and that some were misinformed. Nobody called her a wingnut, except you, alerter.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I think the alerter needs to take a chill pill...
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Hoyt is heartily for TPP fast tracking, as all of his posts attest. I may disagree, but I'm not finding anything particularly disruptive here. Ignoring might help.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.