Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Hiding Posts [View all]

Whiskeytide

(4,648 posts)
16. Excellent post and point.....
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 01:36 PM
Apr 2015

.... I am a "hidden post" junkie. I usually find them fascinating - especially the genuine meltdowns, and the obvious trolls. And the comments are usually funny as hell. That probably says a lot about me, I suppose!!

But because I can't resist the blue view post, I have seen more than a few absolutely ridiculous hides, and many that were obviously based on a personal vendetta with the accused. Also, quite a few "we should not have to see that on a democratic board".... WTF? Are our positions so delicate that we cannot defend them from criticism? Put on your big boy/girl underwear, folks, pick up a keyboard, and take up a post on the bandwidth.

But we do need a juror honor code -

Oh man, I HATE this poster - If you allow your personal feelings for the accused influence your adjudication of a post, you should be ashamed of yourself. Period. If you have previously had any back and forth with the accused that might have caused you to form an opinion of him/her, you should decline the jury assignment. You would never serve on a real jury if you knew and had fought with the accused, right? Or if you were their best friend? This should be no different.

Well, that doesn't sound very progressive - "I'm voting to hide because I don't agree with that post" is conclusive evidence that the juror desires to change the name of this place to the "Authoritarian Underground"!!

Do I really have to explain myself? - Yes. You do. The "comments/explanation" on your decision should not be "optional". If you can't explain your decision, you should not have made it. If you're too busy to write a one sentence comment explaining your decision, you should have been too busy to thoughtfully adjudicate a post in the first instance.

I wanna be a troll hunter, baby - People sometimes seem to abandoned "innocent until proven guilty" on this progressive discussion board, which stuns me. Here, that would be what you said - leave it unless it is a clear violation of rules. It is very clear from some hides that jurors were intentionally reading the worst into a post. I've seen jurors spend their rent money to extrapolate evil intent from something that was, at best, vague and ambiguous. Beyond a reasonable doubt really does mean something.

Hiding someone's words and opinions is always a big freakin' deal - even on an internet board. Please do it thoughtfully and with sound, democratic principles, or decline to do it. You owe that to your DU community.






Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hiding Posts [View all] samsingh Apr 2015 OP
If only... NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #1
Good luck with that. nt Tarheel_Dem Apr 2015 #2
People should use good judgement on a jury and not look to get even. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #3
Recommended. H2O Man Apr 2015 #4
See, I think you're enforcing your personal viewpoint by doing that. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #7
problem is people have different lines in the sand regarding rude and insensitive Romeo.lima333 Apr 2015 #8
Sure, everything is subjective. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #9
Sorry Erich, But We Disagree ProfessorGAC Apr 2015 #11
'over the top' is one of criteria. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #12
Then Read Your Post Through The Lens Of Another ProfessorGAC Apr 2015 #18
Yes, it does. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #22
If a post doesn't violate the TOS, then there is no reason to hide it. To some people, disagreeing sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #15
Then why are we given those reasons for hiding it? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #17
Well, I agree that it would raise the standards of discourse here if people did hide 'rude' posts. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #23
Your definition of rude seems pretty close to mine. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #25
Not what Skinner says HERVEPA Apr 2015 #29
The Admins, not juries, enforce the TOS... SidDithers Apr 2015 #31
I've served on juries cwydro Apr 2015 #5
I've never insulted an alerter, but I don't necessaily think it's out of bounds tishaLA Apr 2015 #13
I would add that you should not vote NOT to hide a post simply because you think Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #6
Conservatives are not capable of making objective judgments. This is the major Zorra Apr 2015 #10
A clear violation of what rules? pintobean Apr 2015 #14
Excellent post and point..... Whiskeytide Apr 2015 #16
a huge responsibility is raising a child...just to put it in persepective snooper2 Apr 2015 #19
hiding rightwing advocacy is what makes this a liberal/progressive place. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #20
I opt out of jury duty olddots Apr 2015 #21
I do as well. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #24
I agree with you but the posts are not hidden by juries. former9thward Apr 2015 #26
Well-said! I take my jury service seriously, and end up hiding maybe 3 out of 10 times arcane1 Apr 2015 #27
Why is this meta post not locked? nt TBF Apr 2015 #28
Perhaps your post should be hidden, since it is more Meta than the one you are complaining about? HERVEPA Apr 2015 #30
Locking - host consensus that this is meta. cbayer Apr 2015 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hiding Posts»Reply #16