General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Goodbye Will Twain: A ratfucker unmasked [View all]Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)I expressly said that I didn't remember if I'd ever rec'd one of Will Twain's OP's. I don't know whether I'd deem any of them valuable. I was addressing the more general point of whether a rec of a post should be evaluated based on the content of the rec'd post or based on subsequent information as to the poster's motives. The latter is clearly the ad hominem fallacy.
An example: One of my Democratic Senators, Robert Menendez, is in the news because of accusations against him. A post containing accurate information about an important development in the case would be valuable, IMO. Your view seems to be that the post would be valuable if coming from a true progressive, but not if coming from someone who just enjoyed posting something negative about an elected Democrat. That's where we disagree. I see value in getting accurate information regardless of the source.
You may well be right that most DUers agree with you. Those folks should probably put me on Ignore.