Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is the TPP not public information, and why can Senators not discuss it? [View all]pampango
(24,692 posts)64. republicans accused FDR: "secretly has made tariff agreements with our foreign competitors"
after he reversed the high tariffs republicans had passed in the 1920's and negotiated agreements to lower them.
The 1936 republican party platform:
It has destroyed the morale of our people and made them dependent upon government.
Appeals to passion and class prejudice have replaced reason and tolerance.
It has created a vast multitude of new offices, filled them with its favorites, set up a centralized bureaucracy, and sent out swarms of inspectors to harass our people.
It has bred fear and hesitation in commerce and industry, thus discouraging new enterprises, preventing employment and prolonging the depression.
It secretly has made tariff agreements with our foreign competitors, flooding our markets with foreign commodities.
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29639
Apparently presidents have been negotiating 'secret trade (tariff) agreements' for a long time and those that oppose them don't like that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why is the TPP not public information, and why can Senators not discuss it? [View all]
Logical
Apr 2015
OP
LOL, so Obama is 100% behind something that is not even final? Wow, that is pretty stupid. nt
Logical
Apr 2015
#5
She's a little late since it will be public before Congress votes. But why not play politics wirh
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#36
So if it is going to be made public before the vote why the argument that it is not being made
still_one
Apr 2015
#44
I want Obama to get the best deal he can, Fast Track is an important part of that.
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#62
We have to pass the treaty so you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of controversy?
PoliticAverse
Apr 2015
#11
The negotiating docs are classified, but the treaty itself has been publicly promoted since 2009
ucrdem
Apr 2015
#31
Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Orrin Hatch, Heritage, CATO, the RNC, and Wall Street also have
Elwood P Dowd
Apr 2015
#45
Warren has read it and does not like it, hmmm, but you hate her i assume! Gullibility...
Logical
Apr 2015
#76
You forgot to add that he is 'selling us down the river' in order to be rich after he retires.
pampango
Apr 2015
#77