Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
142. I'm gonna pick cherried and turn the tables from another thread:
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 06:37 AM
Apr 2015
U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman said in January that the fast-track bill "puts Congress in the driver’s seat to define our negotiating objectives and strengthens congressional oversight."

http://www.ibtimes.com/fast-track-authority-president-4-key-facts-about-proposed-trans-pacific-partnership-1888879

Well, by all means let's let the GOP controlled House and more importantly, the GOP Senate in charge of approving or declining treaties, have the right to tinker with the word in an agreement that many nations signed onto to get Congressional approval. A hint in the article is here:

A bill that would grant President Barack Obama more authority to negotiate international trade deals is under scrutiny on Capitol Hill. Obama is pictured here at the White House, April 14, 2015.

This sound like Iran nuke treaty obstruction again. The Koch Bros. have enough money to make a years long campaign to stop Obama from doing ANYTHING in order to sabotage America.



Tea Party and their front groups did not appear overnight. In fact, it started under Clinton with the big CT pundits and talk radio, who have since gone full Bircher.

In 2007 Bush promised the Koches Keystone and by that time they had most GOP leaders in their hip pocket. And those who weren't, were replaced by Tea Partiers. Charles Koch threatened Obama with two things his first year in office, that the Bush tax cut would NOT be sunsetted as intended in 2010, and if Obama didn't approve Keystone, that he would pay for it politically.

Obama ignored them and they told their media pals to promote the Tea Party. The result of almost a decade of RF 101, was a GOP majority that made the first order of business to rally the nation against the sunset of the Bush tax cuts by using media to call it a 'tax hike,' which people have been brainwashed against, despite that Obama was going to make it progressive. A high rate for the very wealthy, and less for the majority, and a lot of cuts for the working class and poor.

That was their first act and they held things up with threats of a shut down until they got in office in 2011 and immediately did it every year, getting more radical and making more outrageous demands. They have extorted and brainwashed the public at the same time and had full media assistance every stunt pulled.

At their last big stunt in 2013, they went all out. The opposition, whoever they are, screamed Obama was walking across the street to the Federal Reserve and talking with bankers. Oh, no!

That's when Boehner's face fell and the GOP capitulated in spite of Rand Paul saying he could sell default to the American people as reasonable, and Cornyn gleefully said they would get the chance to manage catastrophe with default. They wanted to re-organize the government on the ALEC maodel.

But the evil Obama went around and talked to his evil friends. I'm sure they showed Boehner and few pf the other conspirators a more graphic version of the Nutcracker Suite than most people see. They folded like the cheap deck of cards they are.

Nonetheless, the Koch dollars have not stopped flowing to get the American people busy and attacking each other while they run away with the store out of sight in state after state. They may be evil, but they have the best minds and mouths to sell their Randian vision money can buy.



Note, the other nations don't need us on this agreement. The USA is not essential, it is but one of many, just as the Iran deal was, and the Europeans didn't care for the GOP interfering with things that were goign to affect them.

Might that also be the case with this deal? That the other nations will just go with each other and leave us out of it? That would be great for the Koches, they'd get to have us be worse off. Break the nation and sell it off in pieces. As if the GOP are not doing this now in every state they control while the Democrats devour their own.

That's from a reply to someone I replied to. I chose to interpret it with fire extinguishers. I see a number of things that could be alarming, but that part of that paragraph stood out for me.

About Froman from his Wikipedia page, he doesn't sound bad, but I see a few alarm bells there:

Froman spent much of his career within the United States Department of the Treasury[2] where he rose to Chief of Staff under Robert Rubin in January 1997 and served until July 1999.

Sounds wonderful but there are things we ought to consider with this source. I don't personally know this man, he may be a saint.

After the end of the Clinton administration in 2001, Froman followed Robert Rubin from the Treasury Department to Citigroup.*[10] He was President and Chief Executive Officer of CitiInsurance and head of Emerging Markets Strategy at Citigroup, managing infrastructure and sustainable development investments.[2] He received more than $7.4 million from January 2008 to 2009 alone.*

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Froman

*Now, those are not necessarily bad things, if one looks at those items neutrally. Where are the anti-1% crowd when we need them to examine the people who want this deal destroyed?

Or maybe just wants to reform it, but this is a strange way to do it, revealing what goes on when these guys swear to not do so, or so I'd think. And it's not all that 'not transparent' or 'secret' since members of Congress have in their hands the actual agreement RIGHT NOW. The ones who didn't get hard copies are the ones complaining.

*I've been in such processes, and it's trying to not get hard copy and told you can't take them with you. I found out something very odd in my attempts. Others had come and gotten access, took the hard copies, and re-wrote them. IOW, not all people can be trusted with official documents, who knew?

Then the people who needed them for work, didn't have them, couldn't prove what the original said because of the edited copies floating about, which was true. A real pickle ensued and the rules were changed. Because the ones who got the copies and changed them didn't give a damn about the others affected.

Don't get me wrong, the value of having a hard copy is inestimable.
When I can get one, I do. But it can be suppressed, altered, or cherry picked for agenda. I know a number of whistleblowers and people that have testified in court and before legislatures. There is no media support, if it does not suit their agenda. People ought to think about what who owns the media and what their agenda is. These people who speak out, suffer alone and it's a hell of a road to go on, but necessary. Not all survive with their health intact or financially. No one cares about them, except those they're helping who are also nameless.



My argument on another thread, is also jusified in the article cited to say this was an evil process:

Fast track only means no added amendments made by the Senate, IOW, changes to the written agreement the signatories didn't agree to, so this is a basic logic fail.

Boo fucking hoo, they can't amend the words of others, but they can say No if they want. Get out the fire extinguishera and put the fire out, burnt hair stinks.

The reason for no amendments or fast tracking is the other nations involved are not in the Senate, HELLO? They'd have no say to what could disadvantage them for years, how is that an honest deal for them?

This is media brainwashing just like Iran negotiations were. Because... Obama can't be trusted, sn't smart enough, is a traitor and he's not a real American! Give it a rest!

The completed treaty that the Senate has the last word on would be their last chance for nations to have input, you can't change what they agreed to without starting again.

The Senate can vote the treaty up or down. Most of the uproar is ignorance of basic civics.

Would any of us sign onto something that will impact us for years and have a third party jump in after we've signed unto and change the rules?

Hell no...


That being said, it has good and bad things in it. The Congress is stepping out of its Constitutional role. It can NOT be the negotiator here, any more than they can set in and vote in all the countries of the world and tell them what they can and cannot do. If ego was a fossil fuel, gas would cost a quarter a gallon. I call BS. Not on all the fine people with concerns like Sanders, etc. On the GOP Congress that runs these stories.

I can see the hilarity of the GOP 'SPEAK ENGLISH, FURRINER' mob in a foreign capitol trying to negotiate ANYTHING. They are not fit to tule here, much less the world of finance or trade. I smell something rotten. It starts with the letter D and it ends with the letter C, and it's not Denmark.

That's my story, and I'm sticking to it... No sleep for me tonight, but I must go and get ready for the day that is already here.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Courageous woman. polichick Apr 2015 #1
Correct donnasgirl Apr 2015 #45
I watched Cris Matthews program and I didn't think Obama came off all that well. olegramps Apr 2015 #66
I agree about labor & also have concerns re: environment wordpix Apr 2015 #118
K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2015 #2
Liberals don't 'disdain trade deals' in the abstract. Marr Apr 2015 #3
lolwut? that's not what fast track means. JaneyVee Apr 2015 #4
huh? Congress has no part in drafting the TPP cali Apr 2015 #6
Ask Wyden. JaneyVee Apr 2015 #9
That's the TPA, not the TPP and cali Apr 2015 #31
Thanks, Cali. For example, California is in the midst of a drought. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #69
+1 mmonk Apr 2015 #99
Doesn't the fast track authority being pushed continue for 6 years? HereSince1628 Apr 2015 #24
"fast track would mean that Congress couldn’t write an amendment to fix it" sufrommich Apr 2015 #7
They get 90 days to debate and vote. But.... JaneyVee Apr 2015 #19
90 days seems like enough time to stop it sufrommich Apr 2015 #21
ITA JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #35
I agree,the whole thing is curious and confusing to me. nt sufrommich Apr 2015 #40
It will be the usual Joe Worker Apr 2015 #134
I'm gonna pick cherried and turn the tables from another thread: freshwest Apr 2015 #142
This right here . . . JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #155
WRONG. Congress critters have had and will have NO role in drafting the agreement. period. cali Apr 2015 #73
The previous hearings did not include our elected representatives. They may rhett o rick Apr 2015 #102
With Boehner and McConnell in charge, I'm not sure I want to see any amendments pampango Apr 2015 #42
Well given that we now have total R rule that sounds good because they could amend it to make it jwirr Apr 2015 #62
I don't disagree,but I think concepts like sufrommich Apr 2015 #64
In that sense I agree. We have seen too much of this in every bill on the floor. Example: The jwirr Apr 2015 #81
Uh, that one made me feel ill. They have no shame. nt sufrommich Apr 2015 #83
Hold on! salib Apr 2015 #108
What? The 'legislation' has already been drafted without Congress. Now they want to push it through sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #29
It's already "drafted" by the State Dept and other Multi-Nationals. Congress has no hand this. 2banon Apr 2015 #131
Fearless. Intelligent. Well spoken. Determined. His cute little laugh as he tried to dismiss her libdem4life Apr 2015 #5
You nailed it lib. How I love that woman! If only H> hada fraction of <E's gumption & genuineness. InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #28
+1 BeanMusical Apr 2015 #85
That is what caught my attention. Bohunk68 Apr 2015 #144
Exactly. I lost respect for him there. I've been up and down and he's done some good things, libdem4life Apr 2015 #151
!!! nt MannyGoldstein Apr 2015 #8
Why is she still saying 'if'? JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #10
Once Obama released the details, it will be IN WRITING for us to see Cosmic Kitten Apr 2015 #14
Why can't she? JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #16
Do you understand how the TPP document is being chaperoned? Cosmic Kitten Apr 2015 #20
I do and have not JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #26
TPP Leaked Information Koinos Apr 2015 #36
I've read her stuff and the common dreams stuff before JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #46
Bingo! Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding. 2banon Apr 2015 #132
You have a good question but it is my understanding that they got to go into the room and read jwirr Apr 2015 #71
because it's classified under the auspices of national security. cali Apr 2015 #96
What? Have you been following this at all? It doesn't like it from your comment. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #38
Didn't Poppy try to fast track NAFTA too? merrily Apr 2015 #153
Except it's currently labeled "classified" Oilwellian Apr 2015 #53
You are not nice to me :-) JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #59
She explained very clearly that the Senators and Representatives who read it are... hedda_foil Apr 2015 #133
''If the American people would be opposed to a trade agreement if they saw it... Octafish Apr 2015 #11
Fast Track Means that when Obama releases the details JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #17
I understand it means authority for an up-or-down vote. Octafish Apr 2015 #30
We need a good solid whistle blower on this n/t JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #32
Great idea for the Associative Universe to unfold... Octafish Apr 2015 #120
I don't expect the people who wrote it blow the whistle JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #140
This thing has been in the works since 2006! delrem Apr 2015 #112
Great points! In the works since 2006, so why the rush now? Octafish Apr 2015 #115
They don't want a reasoned decision after debate among an informed population. delrem Apr 2015 #117
I hate to remind everyone Joe Worker Apr 2015 #135
Fast Track means that Congress gives up its right to negotiate this Trade Deal, and its role in our sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #49
+1. That's too much power to hand to any President. I don't care how much you trust them. n/t winter is coming Apr 2015 #93
Elizabeth Warren~ The Peoples Champion Cosmic Kitten Apr 2015 #12
Obama is wrong on this! nt Logical Apr 2015 #13
Damn straight. nt B2G Apr 2015 #15
The main point of Fast Track is to eliminate the flood of admendments.. DCBob Apr 2015 #18
Again, what is the urgent NEED for this thing? salib Apr 2015 #109
I think the concern is that it would if opened up for amendments it become a fiasco.. DCBob Apr 2015 #114
The bill IS the fiasco! Fearless Apr 2015 #116
No, I think you misunderstood. salib Apr 2015 #157
No. I think I got it. DCBob Apr 2015 #158
No, because if you "got it" you would provide a good faith response. salib Apr 2015 #159
Reread this thread.. I'm sure you can figure it out. DCBob Apr 2015 #160
The media is playing up the disagreement to make it seem really nasty geek tragedy Apr 2015 #22
The media? Imagine that. They're useless. Worse than useless. Enthusiast Apr 2015 #43
Where did you stand when Bush, at the same point in his administration, tried to Fast Track a Trade sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #50
DU Rec. SixString Apr 2015 #23
Elizabeth has my vote if she wants it, but our republican congress will never "write an amendment pampango Apr 2015 #25
I'm sure they would include their favorite anti choice sufrommich Apr 2015 #27
Plus 1000 n/t JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #33
The sad thing is that.... mimi85 Apr 2015 #61
You are correct but a lot of them got stung by NAFTA and they equate the two. IF those of us who jwirr Apr 2015 #77
that's why it works both ways treestar Apr 2015 #57
The fact that the republicans are all enthused about the TPP should be all the warning necessary.. truebrit71 Apr 2015 #34
+1 Enthusiast Apr 2015 #41
I was hoping she would! ananda Apr 2015 #37
Mr. President, if this TPP is so fucking great, what's the rush? Enthusiast Apr 2015 #39
Obama does a little bit over here, for the common folk, and a little bit over there for the rich. YOHABLO Apr 2015 #124
Legacy of a bigger and Joe Worker Apr 2015 #138
But, but if Joe Worker Apr 2015 #139
I don't like that throwback world. Too many lack a proper knowledge of history to judge Enthusiast Apr 2015 #141
Go get 'em, Elizabeth! MissDeeds Apr 2015 #44
Tribunals Koinos Apr 2015 #47
What A Lady, What A Fighter... ChiciB1 Apr 2015 #48
Well done Liz... Helen Borg Apr 2015 #51
Now we will hear that there isn't TIME to do that. It needs to go into effect NOW. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #52
If Warren would take a second to think about it, Congress could ask Obama and trade reps to go back Hoyt Apr 2015 #54
Hoyt, you were alerted on KMOD Apr 2015 #75
Thanks. Far from a RW troll. I wonder what folks think of the unfounded criticism of Obama? Hoyt Apr 2015 #78
I know, right. KMOD Apr 2015 #87
Nah, just a proud Third Wayer LondonReign2 Apr 2015 #89
No, Hoyt is a Democrat on Democratic Board. Skinner is a Hillary supporter.. you going to call him Cha Apr 2015 #119
Juror #1 needs to be removed from the jury pool. sufrommich Apr 2015 #94
Are you kidding? that happens constantly Doctor_J Apr 2015 #126
Oh come on! Joe Worker Apr 2015 #137
Juror #1: I will vote to hide each and every post he contributes here to DU, from this point forward pampango Apr 2015 #95
It was very weird. KMOD Apr 2015 #97
I think the admins do know who the juries are. There's an sufrommich Apr 2015 #98
Those little thin skinned alerters can't take any Cha Apr 2015 #122
THIS is exactly what I want her and Bernie to continue to do. SoapBox Apr 2015 #55
I have no doubt that President Obama is being "honest". Cha Apr 2015 #123
Well of course we will see before it is voted on treestar Apr 2015 #56
The vast majority of the House Dems are also against fast tracking TPP. It's not just Warren... think Apr 2015 #60
Please stop posting facts, it makes people belonging to a loud but tiny minority very uncomfortable. BeanMusical Apr 2015 #90
K&R! Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #58
K/R Jack Rabbit Apr 2015 #63
Sorry, arguments defending the secrecy and fast-tracking of the TPP are straight up sycophancy whatchamacallit Apr 2015 #65
+1 ejbr Apr 2015 #70
K and R bigwillq Apr 2015 #67
What people seem to forget: graegoyle Apr 2015 #68
Gee she sounds reasonable to me. Puglover Apr 2015 #72
Someone posted this? Wow, that's despicable. BeanMusical Apr 2015 #92
Esteemed by other dimwitted authoritarians maybe n/t whatchamacallit Apr 2015 #104
LOL, the "esteemed" DUer sounds clueless to me. You sound scared of Warren. She would kick... Logical Apr 2015 #121
Like I said yesterday : 99Forever Apr 2015 #74
I have a couple questions. KMOD Apr 2015 #76
I really don't know the answer to your first question. sufrommich Apr 2015 #79
Thanks. KMOD Apr 2015 #88
Bill Clinton didn't. Luminous Animal Apr 2015 #106
Obama and the republicans are afraid that the Dems will want to include wage and safety protections Doctor_J Apr 2015 #127
It looks like wage and safety protections have been addressed KMOD Apr 2015 #128
In your opinion a Boehner-McConnell led congress will vote "to include wage and safety protections pampango Apr 2015 #145
in your opinion a law that huge numbers of dems are against should be passed? Doctor_J Apr 2015 #146
But I'll answer yours if you answer mine. n/t pampango Apr 2015 #149
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #80
k&r for the TRUTH shanti Apr 2015 #82
Fast track means they're in a hurry ... GeorgeGist Apr 2015 #84
Give 'em Hell Elizabeth LittleGirl Apr 2015 #86
Kicking for Elizabeth. democrank Apr 2015 #91
why is this not on Politics 2015 where is would get more exposure (stuff on GD moves off 1st pg fast Bill USA Apr 2015 #100
Go Elizabeth!! AzDar Apr 2015 #101
Peculiar, Obama saves up his quick jabs for fellow Democrats, not the GOP. Eleanors38 Apr 2015 #103
I have always found that peculiar. Enthusiast Apr 2015 #154
His references to opposition by the GOPers is soft, non confrontational and general... Eleanors38 Apr 2015 #156
If FT is passed, FT will require a supermajority to remove a proposed "trade" agreement from FT Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #105
K&R Jefferson23 Apr 2015 #107
Good! Warren is awesome! MoonRiver Apr 2015 #110
Yes she is! One in a million, we're lucky to have her working for US!! /nt RiverLover Apr 2015 #113
k & r & thanks! n/t wildbilln864 Apr 2015 #111
Political writers stoke up an honest disagreement and DU laps it up. cheapdate Apr 2015 #125
http://jarkesypolitical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ObamaShhh4-e1358519562147.jpg blkmusclmachine Apr 2015 #129
Tpp is another corporate giveaway... Thanks Ms. Warren. midnight Apr 2015 #130
You are wrong Joe Worker Apr 2015 #136
Is that what he said Joe Worker? lonestarnot Apr 2015 #147
100% Correct! UCmeNdc Apr 2015 #143
Yeah doesn't sound good to me either Senator. lonestarnot Apr 2015 #148
Thank goodness for Elizabeth Warren Pooka Fey Apr 2015 #150
Cool!!!!!! 4139 Apr 2015 #152
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Elizabeth Warren Fires Ba...»Reply #142