Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
45. Um...
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 06:38 PM
Apr 2015

> I travel quite a bit. 

So did I, once upon a time.

> There are towns in this country who make their revenue from obscured parking rules and speed signs around bends. In point of fact, its a LOT easier not to know a speed limit or limited parking area when you are somewhere OTHER than a place with which you are familiar. 

Well, duh.

> Hell, I did not know that in the State of Connecticut, one cannot make a left turn on a red light to a one way street. Did you? Guess how the fuck I found that out. 

So you simply assumed Connecticut's state traffic laws were congruent with your own's? Maybe you belong in a business that doesn't require so much interstate travel.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yeah! bemildred Apr 2015 #1
They do this in some other countries. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2015 #2
...which don't have 100's of separate jurisdictions jberryhill Apr 2015 #14
No. former9thward Apr 2015 #3
But isn't a ticket a means to alter one's behavior? KansDem Apr 2015 #6
Please ask any policeman if he is trying to alter behavior with tickets. former9thward Apr 2015 #9
+1. nt NutmegYankee Apr 2015 #20
Since when do we ask cops about social policy? merrily Apr 2015 #56
The purpose of tickets is to raise revenue for state or local government. former9thward Apr 2015 #59
The reason I won't ask a cop or meter maid is that their answer is irrelevant to social policy. merrily Apr 2015 #62
If that started happening, you know what would quickly follow jmowreader Apr 2015 #7
Republicans are the only ones who speed? former9thward Apr 2015 #10
Of course not jmowreader Apr 2015 #44
How would they verify annual salary? yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #4
Not to mention those who never worked a day in their lives. arcane1 Apr 2015 #8
If it could be done fairly, I'd have no problem with it. arcane1 Apr 2015 #5
How do you measure rich? Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2015 #11
I suspect you go with the will of the people...put up a progressive scale that's moderate HereSince1628 Apr 2015 #25
A scale of what? Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2015 #28
A progressive scale would gradually increase with income HereSince1628 Apr 2015 #32
OK, so you're talking about income, not wealth. Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2015 #34
No system is going to be perfect...what I suggested was only to answer the question about progressiv HereSince1628 Apr 2015 #37
I'm not giving my financial information to some Podunk town jberryhill Apr 2015 #12
Only to the Podunk town/state bvf Apr 2015 #22
I've gotten tickets in unfamiliar places jberryhill Apr 2015 #42
Um... bvf Apr 2015 #45
Who said anything about business? jberryhill Apr 2015 #47
Deflect much? bvf Apr 2015 #55
So, you have no real answer jberryhill Apr 2015 #64
You're really grasping at straws here. bvf Apr 2015 #65
Upset? jberryhill Apr 2015 #67
Excellent harangue. bvf Apr 2015 #68
The rich are given traffic tickets??? nt valerief Apr 2015 #13
You gotta point. Hoyt Apr 2015 #43
Yep. Nye Bevan Apr 2015 #48
Finland, Home of the $103,000 Speeding Ticket Mosby Apr 2015 #15
People getting treated special, because obviously they thimk they are . orpupilofnature57 Apr 2015 #35
Maybe the value of the fine Sheepshank Apr 2015 #16
You mean the limo and jet set? They have other people drive them around. nt Rex Apr 2015 #17
Pretty much the rich should have a sliding scale on prices on about everything they buy madokie Apr 2015 #18
You've got to be kidding n/t SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #24
Not one fucking bit madokie Apr 2015 #33
To each his or her own n/t SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #38
How's that going to work exactly? philosslayer Apr 2015 #72
What about prison sentences? Shrek Apr 2015 #19
Yes, and lose driving privileges if they don't learn Ilsa Apr 2015 #21
Yes, without a doubt. n/t. bvf Apr 2015 #23
No... sendero Apr 2015 #26
And those taxes should pay state, county and municipal budgets. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2015 #54
^this^ truebluegreen Apr 2015 #60
No n/t SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #27
No. JaneyVee Apr 2015 #29
no lame54 Apr 2015 #30
Let me think a seco YES . orpupilofnature57 Apr 2015 #31
Since traffic fines are meant to be punitive.. Yes! annabanana Apr 2015 #36
Why? Bad driving is not criminal. That used to be the concept about Cleita Apr 2015 #58
NO! Politicalboi Apr 2015 #39
Why not push for both? bvf Apr 2015 #49
Now you have to do the traffic school and pay the fine. Cleita Apr 2015 #61
Oh hell yes. hunter Apr 2015 #40
No. If a rich person gets too many tickets he'll get his license yanked NightWatcher Apr 2015 #41
What about qualifying for discounted rates instead? daredtowork Apr 2015 #46
Yes. If you want justice rather than privilege. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #50
What billionaires are eating Cheese Sandwich Apr 2015 #70
Yes, it should be a flat fee plus percentage of income. NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #51
LOL... No VScott Apr 2015 #52
We'd just be screwing over their drivers. Poor bastards would get fired if the big boss had to brewens Apr 2015 #53
Happened to me. I'm on Social Security and a traffic ticket cost me almost Cleita Apr 2015 #57
I figured as much, though guessed $300. Trillo Apr 2015 #63
Nope. Iggo Apr 2015 #66
What a concept. I think a guy we call Jesus would have thought Cleita Apr 2015 #69
No. flvegan Apr 2015 #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should the rich pay more ...»Reply #45