Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Oh Shit... 'Democrats' Frustration With Obama Boils Over In Trade Battle' - HuffPo [View all]
Democrats' Frustration With Obama Boils Over In Trade BattleMichael McAuliff & Laura Barron-Lopez - HuffPO
Posted: 04/23/2015 3:31 pm EDT Updated: 3 hours ago
<shrug>
WASHINGTON -- Democrats' frustration with President Barack Obama's trade agenda bubbled over Thursday, with key opponents accusing their party's leader of putting more effort into a bid to aid corporate America than anything he's done for the middle class.
Calling it "maddening," Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) told reporters that the Obama administration was putting on a full-court press unlike anything Democrats have ever seen in his presidency in order to win the authority to fast track enormous trade deals.
"I think if you could get my colleagues to be honest, on the Democratic side, with you -- and I think you can mostly -- they will say they've been talked to, approached, lobbied and maybe cajoled by more cabinet members on this issue than any issue since Barack Obama's been president," Brown said.
"That's just sad," he added.
Brown and Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) spoke to reporters about their frustrations a day after the Senate Finance Committee advanced a package of legislation that would grant Obama Trade Promotion Authority, as fast track is more formally known. With it, the president would be able to use expedited procedures to pass the Trans-Pacific Partnership with a dozen Pacific Rim nations and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership with Europe. Together, those two deals represent about two-thirds of the world's economy. Once Obama signs the pacts, Congress would then have no ability to amend or filibuster them, having only an up-or-down vote.
"I wish they put the same effort into minimum wage. I wish they put the same effort into Medicare at 55. I wish they put the same effort into some consumer strengthening on Dodd-Frank," Brown said.
Casey added that he thought it would be better if the administration took "that intensity to lobby folks on trade" and applied it to the Democrats' efforts to focus on the middle class.
"My God, we should be spending our time on that, not having the debate we're having," Casey said.
On the other side of Capitol Hill...
<snip>
More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/23/democrats-fast-track_n_7129276.html
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oh Shit... 'Democrats' Frustration With Obama Boils Over In Trade Battle' - HuffPo [View all]
WillyT
Apr 2015
OP
Oh the zeal at least for single payer was there , unfortunately like now, it was on the wrong side.
A Simple Game
Apr 2015
#96
I think he may also see it as something of a 'closing of the circle' on his life
HereSince1628
Apr 2015
#6
Permanently damaging the Democratic Party might actually be part of the goal.
Enthusiast
Apr 2015
#59
Destroy the Democratic Party and, don't forget, make himself extremely wealthy after he retires.
pampango
Apr 2015
#61
'...freeing candidates from traditional constituencies to allow for pro-business policy'
Ed Suspicious
Apr 2015
#106
This time around we're just too stupid to understand and should "trust" politicians blindly. nt
RedCappedBandit
Apr 2015
#81
Those that did make noise were accused of ODS and being a 'hater' by his fans. n/t
cui bono
Apr 2015
#139
omg... progressive trade deal... how can they say that? They rail against us for criticizing
cui bono
Apr 2015
#143
That is truly sickening. We don't even have all those things in our country any more.
cui bono
Apr 2015
#148
"FDR didn't have to contend with globalization." Other than WWII but that was a different kind of
pampango
Apr 2015
#56
Biggest Obama supporter I know, me, is against him on this, but I believe that HE Believes
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#102
Only alternative is Obama is knowingly and intentionally signing us up for hell and I
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#107
Me neither, hence my talk-me-down-from-the-ledge post. Thanks, NJNP! nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2015
#108
Oh, you are in that camp, cool. I gotta tell ya, this is a head scratcher, part of me wants to
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#110
If we really wanted to solve any of this we put tariffs back while investing in mfg here
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#124
Remember when if you had a transistor radio that said "Made In Japan" it meant it was
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#126
You are right. Note that if Wall Street wasn't making a shitload of money from all of that
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#31
I've had this epiphany as well. When I realized that I was part of the ownership society for the
Ed Suspicious
Apr 2015
#109
I have defended him in the past - now I am ready to cry. Cry for him and us. He could have done
jwirr
Apr 2015
#39
Feigned impotence whenever the cause is for the 99%. It's like watching an actor in a B movie
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#19
Medicare for all and prosecution of the architects of the gulf war would have been plenty
Doctor_J
Apr 2015
#32
Not only because of a lack of enthusiasm, but likely because of deliberate undermining
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#36
I was silly enough to think he was going to fight for such things, which is why I supported him.
Dark n Stormy Knight
Apr 2015
#100
I was fooled one time. But the next time I voted for none of the above in that box.
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#101
Those are the types of improvements that I hoped I was voting for the first time.
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#132
That's clever proactive thinking. Unfortunately they are trying to make it impossible to
GoneFishin
Apr 2015
#27
A liberal couldn't get elected President. The military/industrial complex won't let it happen.
jalan48
Apr 2015
#24
It controls our government. A liberal winning would have little effect on the status quo I believe.
jalan48
Apr 2015
#92
I wish I shared your optimism. Do you really think any new President could 'clean house' with our
jalan48
Apr 2015
#131
We would have a public option right now if the President had shown the passion
Enthusiast
Apr 2015
#57
Amazing that all of the sudden the republicans aren't going to obstruct his every effort
RedCappedBandit
Apr 2015
#82
No one has come out to give any good reasons to support this corporate piece of crap. nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#90
Noticeably absent from these threads are those who want to "wait and see"
riderinthestorm
Apr 2015
#103
The Obama Acolytes DID promise that we would see the REAL OBama after 2012 election.
bvar22
Apr 2015
#145
what should President Obama do? pass up the trade opportunity with the 'dozen Pacific Rim nations?
Sunlei
Apr 2015
#114
I've been hearing the same promises about each and every one of the previous fake free trade
Elwood P Dowd
Apr 2015
#120