Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,706 posts)
9. I think you're misreading that
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 10:15 PM
Apr 2015

Yes... I also first wondered about the impact of the audience's age distribution...

... but your reply actually highlighted why the survey results are entirely valid. You seem to be saying that it might be reasonable for one in three or four people to have less than $1,000 in retirement savings because younger workers often don't start saving until later.

The problem is... that's the mistake. Your situation may work out just fine... but the average investor hitting retirement age who didn't start saving until she was 32... is going to regret it. I can't tell you how many millionaires I know who never made six-figure salaries in their entire careers - but retired comfortably because they started saving and investing when they were young. The longer you wait to start, the greater the sacrifices that you'll have to make when you most need the income for braces/college/weddings/etc.

Starting at age 32 should not be considered acceptable. That 18-30 age group is the one that needs to be targeted with better information regarding how critical that period is.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nearly a third of savers ...»Reply #9