Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Liz Warren plays political games too [View all]procon
(15,805 posts)51. Maybe it's just a case of, "I saw it on the Internet, so it must be true."
I've seen too many posts quoting opinions as facts, citing anonymous bloggers as trusted sources, and linking to various prophets of doom and tortuously manufactured conjectures, and far too few threads like this that actually discuss the actual, known issues of this deal.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
179 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am too! But I genuinely believe that her supporters will be the thing that smash her like a grape
Number23
Apr 2015
#166
too many are just using her. to disrupt du and bash obama. too many really do not give a fuck
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#169
I agree. And this idea that she is a sweet, little blonde lamb that is a paragon of truth and virtue
Number23
Apr 2015
#171
Good post. And if you haven't been properly welcomed, welcome. If so, another never hurts. n/t
libdem4life
Apr 2015
#101
How very odd. That is not what it said when I looked. Also the OP posted on this
merrily
Apr 2015
#160
I like how organized labor, human rights and environmental groups were especially well represented.
Octafish
Apr 2015
#7
See, it's not just Obama's trustworthiness to get a less than halfway decent deal.
hedda_foil
Apr 2015
#10
me, too. but thank you for your information in here. dying for some facts. thank you maggieD. nt
seabeyond
Apr 2015
#29
It's no surprise they support Obama. Nonetheless, the OP article is worthless.
merrily
Apr 2015
#130
I've never been in any personality cult. No one has proven she lied or was duplicitous. No one can.
merrily
Apr 2015
#141
Your claim is that Warren KNOWS America will like the TPP, but is saying America won't?
merrily
Apr 2015
#144
I think you misquoted Warren. You also left out the part where Obama called her out
merrily
Apr 2015
#150
No, you did not quote Warren's words. You took words attributed to other people out of context.
merrily
Apr 2015
#154
Dodge? I am not obligated to repeat myself every time you repeat yourself. Again, see Replies 154
merrily
Apr 2015
#172
Wow. That is NOT what your post 11 conveyed at all. Talk about moving a goalpost.
merrily
Apr 2015
#133
The talks for the TPP did not start in 2002, as your post 11 said. That was a different
merrily
Apr 2015
#148
Is that really the question? Perhaps I am confused on that point, but I wonder if
Jefferson23
Apr 2015
#23
Seems to be a real outbreak of anti-Warren Obama is right fever on the board tonight
rurallib
Apr 2015
#26
Oh? So Warren *could* have told Rachel exactly what she'd read without facing some
winter is coming
Apr 2015
#49
It's in a locked room. People have to have a security clearance to read it AND have
merrily
Apr 2015
#54
You are at least the third or fouth poster who has pointed out the sudden influx.
merrily
Apr 2015
#134
Well, she has read it ans still does not like it. Are you saying she is making it up? nt
Logical
Apr 2015
#27
Wait, so you think the American people will like it?? She is lying about it? nt
Logical
Apr 2015
#31
Yeah, she's not telling the truth about everything.. and I don't give a shite what her supporters
Cha
Apr 2015
#42
LOL, she READ SOMETHING so she is saying what she said the people will not like......
Logical
Apr 2015
#35
Then HOW CAN OBAMA BE SUPPORTING IT????? If she does not have enough information....
Logical
Apr 2015
#44
You found an opinion hit piece in the Daily Banter that supports the position you wanted to take
merrily
Apr 2015
#81
Yes, Elizabeth Warren is being untruthful and of course nobody wants to see that. So they attack
Cha
Apr 2015
#67
You call it the "dark side".. that's doesn't mean it's dark. I have enough respect not to
Cha
Apr 2015
#69
Who can possibly argue with an opinion hit piece in a webzine that flat out claims Warren is lying?
merrily
Apr 2015
#82
Again, thank you.. I agree with what Tommy Christopher said in his article, too. He explains
Cha
Apr 2015
#75
It's probably just a coincidence the rec's are all from Clinton supporters.
AtomicKitten
Apr 2015
#77
And also just a coincidence that most of the strongest Obama supporters are also the
merrily
Apr 2015
#84
YOU read for comprehension. I said you found an article that supported the position you wanted to
merrily
Apr 2015
#129
Uh, yes. Point was, your response was no more "adult level" than the poster you
merrily
Apr 2015
#137
This thread proves one thing. Some of us tend to think anyone who agrees with the position we want
merrily
Apr 2015
#86
No surprise. However, you haven't proven she used bs. Your OP article is ridiculous.
merrily
Apr 2015
#128
A tenured professor at Harvard adept at playing political games? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you.
mulsh
Apr 2015
#102
If Democrats treated republicans like they are treating Ms. Warren, they'd win more elections
notadmblnd
Apr 2015
#103
I think Warren and the Dems should hold the TPP hostage just like the GOP does all the time.
hollowdweller
Apr 2015
#116
Well, since this administration sold public education to the highest bidder....
madfloridian
Apr 2015
#151
Some people sure have taken an interest in your OP. Consider it a (revolting and unwanted) complimen
Number23
Apr 2015
#167
Actually, Number 23, you don't know whether Warren ever voted for Reagan or not.
merrily
Apr 2015
#176