Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Husband had loan insured, but bank never told his widow [View all]PatrickforO
(15,420 posts)17. Cases like this are the MAIN argument against so-called 'tort reform'
Not only should Laura Coleman Biggs be compensated for all those mortgage and insurance premium payments - 'made whole' in legal parlance, but the punitive damages against B of A should be HUGE. In fact, these punitive damages should be SO EXTENSIVE as to assure that B of A will NEVER practice this particular type of fraud EVER AGAIN.
If I were on the jury, I would advocate punitive damages of at least $50 million, which admittedly is a drop in the bucket in the face of the $4.8 billion net profit B of A had in 2014, but still significant.
Because that is the only purpose of punitive damages - to ensure the guilty party has sufficient incentive NEVER to do that particular thing again.
Good luck, Laura.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm not surprised at all. When I handled my father's estate, the biggest nuisance by far involved
Midwestern Democrat
Apr 2015
#4
How is this any different from a man robbing a store that gets 5 years? I'll tell you how
sendit
Apr 2015
#25
K & R. Can they get any lower, more corrupt? And these bankers were deriding & insulting
appalachiablue
Apr 2015
#27
The penalties have to be staggeringly huge. That's the only language these banksters understand.
calimary
Apr 2015
#32
That'd be another tactic to use. But we'd have to make that FEROCIOUSLY strong.
calimary
Apr 2015
#41