Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
33. Here's a typical case under NAFTA. Rich American deliberately lead poisoning children
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 04:02 PM
Apr 2015

This is a prominent case in Peru where investor-state treaties have provided an avenue for companies to delay or reverse agreements which had been enforceable in courts: Peruvians may now be on the hook for an $800 million payout to Renco even though Peruvian children are the ones dying.

It's despicable and a foreshadowing of what lies ahead globally instead of just our usual fucking up South and Central America.

...Renco Group Inc., a company owned by one of the richest men in America, invested in a metal smelter in La Oroya, Peru. The site has been designated as in the top 10 most polluted in the world. The firm has been sued in U.S. court on behalf of severely lead-poisoned children in La Oroya. Sulfur dioxide concentrations at La Oroya greatly exceed international standards, with sulfur dioxide levels doubled in the years after Renco’s acquisition of the complex. Renco’s Peruvian subsidiary promised to install sulfur plants by 2007 as part of an environmental remediation program. Although it was out of compliance with its contractual obligations, the company sought (and Peru granted) two extraordinary extensions to complete the project.

In December 2010, Renco sent Peru a Notice of Intent that it was launching a U.S.-Peru FTA investor-state attack, alleging that Peru’s failure to grant a third extension of the remediation obligations constituted a violation of the firm’s FTA foreign investor rights. The company is demanding $800 million in compensation from Peruvian taxpayers. The Renco case illustrates two deeply worrying implications of investor-state arbitration.

Even the mere threat of a case can put pressure on governments to weaken environment and health policies. Recent developments suggest that the threat of this case was highly effective. While full environmental compliance has yet to be seen, the government has allowed the smelter to restart zinc and lead operations. That would be bad enough, but Renco is also attempting to evade justice in U.S. domestic courts through the investor-state mechanism.

Renco has now successfully argued that the U.S. lawsuit filed on behalf of La Oroya’s children must be removed from a U.S. state court, where it had a decent chance of success. Renco tried to derail the case this way three times before without success. But after filing the investor-state case, the firm claimed that the matter now involved an international treaty and thus was outside the state court’s remit. In January 2011, the same federal judge who rejected the past attempts determined that the existence of the investor-state case made this a federal issue and allowed Renco to terminate the state court case...


read more: http://www.citizen.org/documents/fact-sheet-tpp-and-environment.pdf

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Commence slow-motion swandives onto keyboards to Google "Lambert Strether +dirt" IDemo Apr 2015 #1
LOL .. Yes. To be expected I guess. nt 99th_Monkey Apr 2015 #2
Whew. Do you even understand how the arbiters/judges are selected under trade agreements? Hoyt Apr 2015 #3
However Obama tries to polish the TPP turd 99th_Monkey Apr 2015 #4
And what are the people spreading bull? Hoyt Apr 2015 #5
What? Are you against composting? 99th_Monkey Apr 2015 #6
Right no room for corruption there... raindaddy Apr 2015 #8
They don't undermine. But as to your question, it's simple. They want foreign investment Hoyt Apr 2015 #15
They could actually select a labor leader, a social activist, a liberal too fasttense Apr 2015 #9
Why would a state pick a judge that is likely to rule against them? Hoyt Apr 2015 #16
South Korean agreement was a good one. Hoyt Apr 2015 #18
Well, your argument is solid. I'm sold. stillwaiting Apr 2015 #19
Well, haven't seen any facts from you where it was bad. South Korea is an ally of ours, Hoyt Apr 2015 #21
Ask and ye shall receive. stillwaiting Apr 2015 #24
Sounds like Econ 101 or Remedial level. Actually, Economists vary as to opinion on whether trade Hoyt Apr 2015 #30
Underneath the BALANCED VIEW of trade deficits that you posted stillwaiting Apr 2015 #32
I don't think you have any idea what employment would be like here if we weren't trading with others Hoyt Apr 2015 #34
bullshit. first of all we had extensive trade with South Korea before cali Apr 2015 #26
We've lost jobs under the way those promoting an agenda calculate them. Hoyt Apr 2015 #31
South Korean agreement was a good one???? bvar22 Apr 2015 #28
Fuck the mega corporations and the big pile of capitalist bullshit they rode in on. L0oniX Apr 2015 #7
Well said. hifiguy Apr 2015 #11
Corporations have entirely too much power already. Enthusiast Apr 2015 #10
K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2015 #12
Remember when Obama said he was "against" Citizens United??? blkmusclmachine Apr 2015 #13
People don't get that the objective of the TPP is Litigation ymetca Apr 2015 #14
Yeah, they are going to walk away with trillions from Vietnam. Hoyt Apr 2015 #17
That's the idea. Octafish Apr 2015 #20
No, it's not the idea, it sounds more like a conspiracy theory. Hoyt Apr 2015 #22
Michael Parenti noticed that phrase gets used a lot when power is threatened. Octafish Apr 2015 #25
Nope, I'm thinking of those who appear to think there is language in the TPP that says: Hoyt Apr 2015 #35
Nicely played! Parenti rocks. nt 99th_Monkey Apr 2015 #37
Oh yeah. Thats what it is. a Conspiracy Theory. bvar22 Apr 2015 #29
Here's a typical case under NAFTA. Rich American deliberately lead poisoning children riderinthestorm Apr 2015 #33
Well there is a little bit more to the story than you print, not to mention in 5 years, Renco Hoyt Apr 2015 #36
K&R 99Forever Apr 2015 #23
Global corporate hegemony moondust Apr 2015 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The TPP: Toward Absolutis...»Reply #33