Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: here's my issue with the 'rare' part of safe, legal and rare [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)76. "An unaffordable abortion is not safe ...
... because if you can't afford it you are going to go an unsafe route. Same with "unavailable".
You didn't include "alternate or unsafe route" the first time around. That's why I didn't understand how an unobtainable or unaffordable abortion could be "unsafe".
"And it's blinded you to the fact that you just said abortion was just like polio."
Now THAT is a real stretch. I said that polio and the necessity for an abortion are both things that can be reduced via preventative measures, i.e. inoculation against polio, sex ed and birth control in the latter case. That does not, by any stretch of the imagination, mean that "abortion is just like polio".
What it comes down to is this: No one who is pro-choice is going change their position on easy access to abortion by virtue of hearing the word "rare". And no one who is anti-choice is going to change their position based on that one word either.
People do not base their deeply-held positions on a topic like abortion on whether a "slogan" is worded one way or the other.
"so go continue to fail to expand abortion access by keeping the word 'rare' in a slogan."
Sorry, but that reasoning is so ludicrous it is astounding. Again you are equating the word "rare" with denying access to abortion, or refusing to expand its accessability and affordability.
"Let's make child hunger rare" does not mean let's feed fewer hungry children. It means the opposite. It means let's feed as many hungry children as possible, so that a hungry child is a rarity rather than commonplace.
Wanting abortions to be rare is NOT about denying access to one; it's about reducing the necessity for one - which sex ed and BC would accomplish to a great extent.
So let's end this nonsense. The minute you stated that I said "abortion was just like polio", I realized I was dealing with someone who is not interested in honest discussion, but would rather attribute statements to people who never made them.
We're done here.
You didn't include "alternate or unsafe route" the first time around. That's why I didn't understand how an unobtainable or unaffordable abortion could be "unsafe".
"And it's blinded you to the fact that you just said abortion was just like polio."
Now THAT is a real stretch. I said that polio and the necessity for an abortion are both things that can be reduced via preventative measures, i.e. inoculation against polio, sex ed and birth control in the latter case. That does not, by any stretch of the imagination, mean that "abortion is just like polio".
What it comes down to is this: No one who is pro-choice is going change their position on easy access to abortion by virtue of hearing the word "rare". And no one who is anti-choice is going to change their position based on that one word either.
People do not base their deeply-held positions on a topic like abortion on whether a "slogan" is worded one way or the other.
"so go continue to fail to expand abortion access by keeping the word 'rare' in a slogan."
Sorry, but that reasoning is so ludicrous it is astounding. Again you are equating the word "rare" with denying access to abortion, or refusing to expand its accessability and affordability.
"Let's make child hunger rare" does not mean let's feed fewer hungry children. It means the opposite. It means let's feed as many hungry children as possible, so that a hungry child is a rarity rather than commonplace.
Wanting abortions to be rare is NOT about denying access to one; it's about reducing the necessity for one - which sex ed and BC would accomplish to a great extent.
So let's end this nonsense. The minute you stated that I said "abortion was just like polio", I realized I was dealing with someone who is not interested in honest discussion, but would rather attribute statements to people who never made them.
We're done here.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You're just as eloquent, I just have a large body of work in my journal to c&p from.
PeaceNikki
Apr 2015
#31
women should have access to birth control because it gives them autonomy over their lives
fizzgig
Apr 2015
#11
Do you all really believe Abortion should be used as another form of birth control?
napi21
Apr 2015
#9
It is very rare for a woman to have more than one or two abortions in her lifetime.
liberal_at_heart
Apr 2015
#15
Abortion is not a form of birth control. It is a medical procedure to terminate a pregnancy. The
still_one
Apr 2015
#26
Yes. Do you really want children brought into this world who are not wanted?
PeaceNikki
Apr 2015
#32
i fully understand that comprehensive sex ed and access to birth control reduces the abortion rate
fizzgig
Apr 2015
#21
Actually according to Gallop there are quite a few women who are not pro-choice
still_one
Apr 2015
#27
That is a very subjective polling question...many women consider themselves to be
CTyankee
Apr 2015
#29
That is a good point, and it isn't made clear in that poll. However, the trend graphs near the
still_one
Apr 2015
#42
I don't know but if they are saying they are pro-life but don't want Roe reversed
CTyankee
Apr 2015
#59
That's because culture has taught women that is what they are supposed to say.
PeaceNikki
Apr 2015
#33
I agree with you. However, for whatever reason, though not a majority, there are still too many women who
still_one
Apr 2015
#48
It's about changing the rhetoric at a time when efforts to restrict access are hugely successful.
PeaceNikki
Apr 2015
#39
That was a decade ago. Things have changed and he's gone so not cozying up with anyone.
PeaceNikki
Apr 2015
#45
Nancy Pelosi: "we want abortions to be safe, rare, and reduce the number of abortions".
Nye Bevan
Apr 2015
#46