Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Obama Shifts His Pitch For The Trans-Pacific Partnership - WaPo [View all]
Obama shifts his pitch for the Trans-Pacific PartnershipBy David Nakamura - WaPo
April 26 at 5:58 PM
<snip>
Pitching his Pacific free-trade initiative to business leaders last December, President Obama framed it as a foreign policy gambit: He mentioned the looming threat of China 18 times in remarks to the Business Roundtable.
Last week, while making the case to 200 liberal activists, Obama mentioned China only once.
Instead, in a 4,000-word address to Organizing for Action (OFA), Obama sought to place his trade pact alongside his signature domestic initiatives, including his health-care law, auto industry bailout, student loan consolidation and Wall Street reform.
The sharp shift in the way Obama is now presenting the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a 12-nation trade deal in the Asia Pacific region, illustrates his biggest challenge as he tries to wrap up a late-term policy victory over fierce opposition from fellow Democrats.
His critics on the left are calling the TPP a job-killing, big-business boondoggle aimed at satisfying K Street corporate interests. And that has put Obama under pressure to explain how the pact will help ordinary American workers and families. In his weekly radio address, he called the deal vital to middle-class economics.
It hasnt been easy. Facing heat from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), the AFL-CIO and even usually friendly MSNBC hosts, Obama has sounded incredulous that his progressive bona fides are coming under question.
When people say that this trade deal is bad for working families, they dont know what theyre talking about, Obama told OFA, the advocacy group that evolved from his campaign apparatus. I take that personally. My entire presidency has been about helping working families. Ive been working too hard at this. Ive got some of those folks who are saying this stuff after all Ive done to help lift their industries up.
It is a frustrating reversal of fortune for Obama, who was embraced in 2008 as the progressive darling of hope and change. Now, even his former secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton, whom progressives abandoned in the 2008 primary, hedged recently in her support for the TPP as she lurches to the left to shore up support from the base ahead of her 2016 campaign.
<snip>
More: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-shifts-his-pitch-for-the-trans-pacific-partnership/2015/04/26/6e420632-ea8c-11e4-aae1-d642717d8afa_story.html
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No matter what the Washington Post attributes to the President, China was always a big part of the
still_one
Apr 2015
#2
Even in cartoon form it is a lot to digest. One thing mentioned that I wondered about was the
still_one
Apr 2015
#18
In 2008 the Banksters blackmail the American people by threatening to blow up the economy.
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#9
Sadly the average people won't understand the damage. If it doesn't immediately effect them
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#36
How very, very sad that a Democratic President would say, "“When people say that this trade deal is
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#7
one speech for the hoi polloi, another for his benefactors. how can anyone trust him any more?
Doctor_J
Apr 2015
#14
Wait. What? Did you say, "I now can't believe this Hawaiian car salesman ever went to Harvard . ."
NYC_SKP
Apr 2015
#33