Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama Shifts His Pitch For The Trans-Pacific Partnership - WaPo [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)26. Try ALL of it. The theft has escalated during this presidency.
The Richest 1 Percent Have Captured 121 Percent Of Income Gains During The Recovery
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/12/1579211/1-percent-121-gains/
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022365380
Last year, economist Emmanuel Saez estimated that the richest 1 percent of the U.S. captured a whopping 93 percent of the income gains in 2010, as the U.S. was emerging from the Great Recession. Saez is now back with updated numbers from 2011, and they make the picture look even grimmer:
From 2009 to 2011, average real income per family grew modestly by 1.7% (Table 1) but the gains were very uneven. Top 1% incomes grew by 11.2% while bottom 99% incomes shrunk by 0.4%. Hence, the top 1% captured 121% of the income gains in the first two years of the recovery. From 2009 to 2010, top 1% grew fast and then stagnated from 2010 to 2011. Bottom 99% stagnated both from 2009 to 2010 and from 2010 to 2011.
How is it possible for the 1 percent to capture more than all of the nations income gains? The number is due to the fact that those at the bottom saw their incomes drop. As Timothy Noah explained in the New Republic, the one percent didnt just gobble up all of the recovery during 2010 and 2011; it put the 99 percent back into recession.
Saez added that In 2012, top 1% income will likely surge, due to booming stock-prices, as well as re-timing of income to avoid the higher 2013 top tax rates This suggests that the Great Recession has only depressed top income shares temporarily and will not undo any of the dramatic increase in top income shares that has taken place since the 1970s.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/12/1579211/1-percent-121-gains/
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022365380
Last year, economist Emmanuel Saez estimated that the richest 1 percent of the U.S. captured a whopping 93 percent of the income gains in 2010, as the U.S. was emerging from the Great Recession. Saez is now back with updated numbers from 2011, and they make the picture look even grimmer:
From 2009 to 2011, average real income per family grew modestly by 1.7% (Table 1) but the gains were very uneven. Top 1% incomes grew by 11.2% while bottom 99% incomes shrunk by 0.4%. Hence, the top 1% captured 121% of the income gains in the first two years of the recovery. From 2009 to 2010, top 1% grew fast and then stagnated from 2010 to 2011. Bottom 99% stagnated both from 2009 to 2010 and from 2010 to 2011.
How is it possible for the 1 percent to capture more than all of the nations income gains? The number is due to the fact that those at the bottom saw their incomes drop. As Timothy Noah explained in the New Republic, the one percent didnt just gobble up all of the recovery during 2010 and 2011; it put the 99 percent back into recession.
Saez added that In 2012, top 1% income will likely surge, due to booming stock-prices, as well as re-timing of income to avoid the higher 2013 top tax rates This suggests that the Great Recession has only depressed top income shares temporarily and will not undo any of the dramatic increase in top income shares that has taken place since the 1970s.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No matter what the Washington Post attributes to the President, China was always a big part of the
still_one
Apr 2015
#2
Even in cartoon form it is a lot to digest. One thing mentioned that I wondered about was the
still_one
Apr 2015
#18
In 2008 the Banksters blackmail the American people by threatening to blow up the economy.
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#9
Sadly the average people won't understand the damage. If it doesn't immediately effect them
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#36
How very, very sad that a Democratic President would say, "“When people say that this trade deal is
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#7
one speech for the hoi polloi, another for his benefactors. how can anyone trust him any more?
Doctor_J
Apr 2015
#14
Wait. What? Did you say, "I now can't believe this Hawaiian car salesman ever went to Harvard . ."
NYC_SKP
Apr 2015
#33