Dr oz is no wizard but no quack either

[longship]

84. I see. The argument from inevitable corruption.

But if you were a pharmacy tech you would know that pharmacy is based on biology and chemistry, in other words, science.

I apologize about jumping to conclusions. But I happen to believe that science-based medicine is the best solution to these problems by eliminating alternative/complimentary medicine altogether, and putting more accountability into real medicine. There is just altogether too much quackery since DSHEA passed.

But I have a low tolerance for people who show implicit support to it by using tu quoque arguments. Beyond that, such arguments detract from the subject of this thread which is about Dr. Oz's quackery. In other words, such responses are non sequitur.

If you want to spew about the dangers of Pharma, start your own thread. This one is about a doctor who promotes abject quackery.